• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Union Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in Germany (2008)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [cep.lse.ac.uk]
  • [portal.uni-freiburg.de]
  • [www.empiwifo.uni-freiburg.de]
  • [portal.uni-freiburg.de]
  • [www.forschungsdatenzentrum.de]
  • [www.forschungsdatennetzwerk.de]
  • [repec.iza.org]
  • [anon-ftp.iza.org]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Bernd Fitzenberger , Karsten Kohn , Alexander Lembcke
Citations:17 - 4 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Fitzenberger08uniondensity,
    author = {Bernd Fitzenberger and Karsten Kohn and Alexander Lembcke},
    title = {Union Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in Germany},
    year = {2008}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

Collective bargaining in Germany takes place either at the industry level or at the firm level; collective bargaining coverage is much higher than union density; and not all employees in a covered firm are necessarily covered. This institutional setup suggests to distinguish explicitly union power as measured by net union density (NUD) in a labor market segment, coverage at the firm level, and coverage at the individual level. Using linked employer-employee data and applying quantile regressions, this is the first empirical paper which simultaneously analyzes these three dimensions of union influence on the structure of wages. Ceteris paribus, a higher share of employees in a firm covered by industry-wide or firm-level contracts is associated with higher wages. Yet, individual bargaining coverage in a covered firm shows a negative impact both on the wage level and on wage dispersion. A higher union density is negative at all points in the wage distribution for uncovered employees. In line with an insurance motive, higher union density compresses the wage structure and, at the same time, it is associated with a uniform leftward movement of the distribution for uncovered employees.

Keyphrases

union density    union wage effect    uncovered employee    covered firm    firm level    labor market segment    wage distribution    net union density    insurance motive    collective bargaining    negative impact    first empirical paper    firm-level contract    individual level    employer-employee data    institutional setup    quantile regression    industry level    wage structure    wage level    union influence    union power    collective bargaining coverage    uniform leftward movement    wage dispersion    ceteris paribus    individual bargaining coverage   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University