Abstract:
Human language is learned, symbolic and exhibits syntactic structure, a set of properties which make it unique among naturally-occurring communication systems. How did human language come to be as it is? Language is culturally transmitted and cultural processes may have played a role in shaping language. However, it has been suggested that the cultural transmission of language is constrained by some language-specic innate endowment. The primary objective of the research outlined in this paper is to investigate how such an endowment would inuence the acquisition of language and the dynamics of the repeated cultural transmission of language.
Citations
|
531
|
The symbol grounding problem
– Harnad
- 1990
|
|
266
|
On Nature and Language
– Chomsky
- 2002
|
|
241
|
Learning and Development in Neural Networks: The Importance of Starting Small
– Elman
- 1993
|
|
224
|
Knowledge of Language. Its Nature, Origin, and Use
– Chomsky
- 1986
|
|
128
|
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
– Boyd, PJ
- 1985
|
|
79
|
How to invent a lexicon: the development of shared symbols in interaction
– Hutchins, Hazlehurst
- 1995
|
|
59
|
Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure: an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity
– Kirby
- 2001
|
|
58
|
The emergence of a ‘language’ in an evolving population of neural networks
– Cangelosi, Parisi
- 1998
|
|
55
|
Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar
– Batali
- 1998
|
|
49
|
Innate biases and critical periods: combining evolution and learning in the acquisition of syntax
– Batali
- 1994
|
|
39
|
The emergence of linguistic structure: an overview of the iterated learning model
– Kirby, Hurford
- 2002
|
|
33
|
From robotic toil to symbolic theft: Grounding transfer from entry-level to higher-level categories. Connection Science 12:143–162. 18 The theory is part of a larger investigation of vision-language integration in AI, which also includes empirical work on
– Cangelosi, Greco, et al.
|
|
28
|
Compositional syntax from cultural transmission
– Brighton
- 2002
|
|
27
|
The learning barrier: Moving from innate to learned systems of communication
– Oliphant
- 1999
|
|
26
|
Learning and morphological change
– Hare, Elman
- 1995
|
|
26
|
Cognitive basis of language learning in infants
– Macnamara
- 1972
|
|
25
|
Establishing communication systems without explicit meaning transmission
– Smith
- 2001
|
|
21
|
The survival of the smallest: Stability conditions for the cultural evolution of compositional language
– Brighton, Kirby
- 2001
|
|
21
|
Infants’ contribution to the achievement of joint reference
– Baldwin
- 1991
|
|
19
|
Early referential understanding: Infant’s ability to recognize referential acts for what they are. Developmenal psychology
– Baldwin
- 1993
|
|
19
|
Modelling the Evolution of Linguistic Diversity
– Livingstone, Fyfe
- 1999
|
|
18
|
Recursive inconsistencies are hard to learn: A connectionist perspective on universal word order correlations
– Christiansen, Devlin
- 1997
|
|
18
|
On the logic of contrast
– Clark
- 1988
|
|
18
|
Computational simulations of the emergence of grammar. In: Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases
– BATALI
- 1998
|
|
17
|
Infants' ability to consult the speaker for clues to word reference
– Baldwin
- 1993
|
|
17
|
The Emergence of Propositions from the Co-ordination of Talk and Action in a Shared World
– Hazlehurst, Hutchins
- 1998
|
|
12
|
Modeling the evolution of communication: From stimulus associations to grounded symbolic associations
– Cangelosi
- 1999
|
|
10
|
Educating eve: the ‘language instinct’ debate
– Sampson
- 1997
|
|
9
|
The importance of rapid cultural convergence in the evolution of learned symbolic communication
– Smith
- 2001
|
|
6
|
An emergence of coordinated communication in populations of agents
– Kvasnicka, Pospchal
- 1999
|
|
3
|
Intentionality and word learning. Trends in cognitive sciences
– Bloom
- 1997
|