DMCA
Wcet tool challenge 2011: Report (2011)
| Venue: | In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis |
| Citations: | 1 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Hanxleden11wcettool,
author = {Reinhard Von Hanxleden and Niklas Holsti and Björn Lisper and Erhard Ploedereder and Reinhard Wilhelm (eds and Armelle Bonenfant and Hugues Cassé and Sven Bünte and Wolfgang Fellger and Jan Gustafsson and Benedikt Huber and Nazrul Mohammad Islam and Raimund Kirner and Laura Kovács and Felix Krause and Adrian Prantl and Martin Schoeberl and Simon Wegener and Michael Zolda and Jakob Zwirchmayr},
title = {Wcet tool challenge 2011: Report},
booktitle = {In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) Analysis},
year = {2011}
}
Share
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
OpenURL
Abstract
Following the successful WCET Tool Challenges in 2006 and 2008, the third event in this series was organized in 2011, again with support from the ARTIST DESIGN Network of Excellence. Following the practice established in the previous Challenges, the WCET Tool Challenge 2011 (WCC’11) defined two kinds of problems to be solved by the Challenge participants with their tools, WCET problems, which ask for bounds on the execution time, and flow-analysis problems, which ask for bounds on the number of times certain parts of the code can be executed. The benchmarks to be used in WCC’11 were debie1, PapaBench, and an industrial-strength application from the automotive domain provided by Daimler. Two default execution platforms were suggested to the participants, the ARM7 as “simple target ” and the MPC5553/5554 as a “complex target, ” but participants were free
Keyphrases
wcet tool challenge automotive domain default execution platform artist design network complex target simple target successful wcet tool challenge execution time challenge participant previous challenge flow-analysis problem wcet problem time certain part third event industrial-strength application
