Do Summaries Help? A Task-Based Evaluation of Multi-Document Summarization (2005)
| Venue: | In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval |
| Citations: | 15 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Mckeown05dosummaries,
author = {Kathleen Mckeown and Rebecca J. Passonneau and David K. Elson and Ani Nenkova and Julia Hirschberg},
title = {Do Summaries Help? A Task-Based Evaluation of Multi-Document Summarization},
booktitle = {In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval},
year = {2005}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
We describe a task-based evaluation to determine whether multi-document summaries measurably improve user performance when using online news browsing systems for directed research. We evaluated the multi-document summaries generated by Newsblaster, a robust news browsing system that clusters online news articles and summarizes multiple articles on each event. Four groups of subjects were asked to perform the same time-restricted fact-gathering tasks, reading news under different conditions: no summaries at all, single sentence summaries drawn from one of the articles, Newsblaster multi-document summaries, and human summaries. Our results show that, in comparison to source documents only, the quality of reports assembled using Newsblaster summaries was significantly better and user satisfaction was higher with both Newsblaster and human summaries.
