Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition (1989)
| Venue: | Cognitive Psychology |
| Citations: | 99 - 11 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Pinker89mentalrotation,
author = {Michael J. Tarrandsteven Pinker},
title = {Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition},
journal = {Cognitive Psychology},
year = {1989},
pages = {233--282}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
How do we recognize objects despite differences in their retinal projections when they are seen at different orientations? Marr and Nishihara (1978) proposed that shapes are represented in memory as structural descriptions in objectcentered coordinate systems, so that an object is represented identically regardless of its orientation. An alternative hypothesis is that an object is represented in memory in a single representation corresponding to a canonical orientation, and a mental rotation operation transforms an input shape into that orientation before input and memory are compared. A third possibility is that shapes are stored in a set of representations, each corresponding to a different orientation. In four experiments, subjects studied several objects each at a single orientation, and were given extensive practice at naming them quickly, or at classifying them as normal or mirror-reversed, at several orientations. At first, response times increased with departure from the study orientation, with a slope similar to those obtained in classic mental rotation experiments. This suggests that subjects made both judgments by mentally transforming the orientation of the input shape to the one they







