Perception of onset asynchronies: Acoustic piano versus synthesized complex versus pure tones (2001)
| Citations: | 1 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@MISC{Goebl01perceptionof,
author = {Werner Goebl and Richard Parncutt},
title = {Perception of onset asynchronies: Acoustic piano versus synthesized complex versus pure tones},
year = {2001}
}
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
anticipation of an event make it more or less prominent (salient)? Moreover, does this depend on the type of tone? Each experiment consisted of 88 trials: 4 tone types x 2 interval sizes x 11 asynchronies. Tone types were pure, harmonic complex with 16 partials (-6 dB per octave), MIDI-synthesized piano, and recorded from a computer-monitored grand piano. The pair of tones in each trial spanned an interval of an octave or a major seventh. Asynchronies varied from-50 ms to 50 ms, in 10 ms steps. The tone duration ranged from 300 to 400 ms so that the overlap of the two tones were constant at 350 ms. Musically trained and untrained listeners were asked to judge these stimuli on two separate occasions, each with a two-alternative forced choice paradigm. In the Experiment 1, they indicated which tone was more prominent. In Experiment 2, they indicated which sounded earlier. Preliminary analysis of Experiment 1 firstly confirmed the finding and theory of Bregman and Pinker (1978) that as
Citations
| 24 | Mapping musical thought to musical performance - Palmer - 1989 |
| 23 | Melody Lead in Piano Performance: Expressive Device or Artifact - Goebl - 2001 |
| 23 | Accent structures in music performance - Drake, Palmer - 1993 |
| 16 | Auditory streaming and the building of timbre - Bregman, Pinker - 1978 |
| 15 | The perception of simultaneous notes such as in polyphonic music - Rasch - 1978 |
| 11 | Auditory perception of temporal order - Hirsh |
| 7 | Patterns of note onset asynchronies in expressive piano performance - Repp - 1996 |
| 1 | Is there a natural sensitivity at 20ms in relative tone-onset-time continua - Rosen - 1987 |
