Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future (2003)
| Venue: | Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press. Chang, H. (2000). ‘A Liberal Theory of Social Welfare: Fairness, Utility, and the Pareto Principle’, Yale Law Review |
| Citations: | 20 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Camerer03behavioraleconomics:,
author = {Colin F. Camerer and George Loewenstein},
title = {Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, Future},
booktitle = {Advances in Behavioral Economics, Princeton, Princeton University Press. Chang, H. (2000). ‘A Liberal Theory of Social Welfare: Fairness, Utility, and the Pareto Principle’, Yale Law Review},
year = {2003},
pages = {173--235}
}
OpenURL
Abstract
of the process) for helpful comments. 1 Behavioral economics increases the explanatory power of economics by providing it with more realistic psychological foundations. This book consists of representative recent articles in behavioral economics. 1 This chapter is intended to provide an introduction to the approach and methods of behavioral economics, and to some of its major findings, applications, and promising new directions. It also seeks to fill some unavoidable gaps in the chapters ’ coverage of topics. What Behavioral Economics Tries To Do At the core of behavioral economics is the conviction that increasing the realism of the psychological underpinnings of economic analysis will improve economics on its own terms--generating theoretical insights, making better predictions of field phenomena, and suggesting better policy. This conviction does not imply a wholesale rejection of the neoclassical approach to economics based on utility maximization, equilibrium, and efficiency. The neoclassical approach is useful because it provides economists with a theoretical framework that can be applied to almost any form of economic (and even non-economic) behavior, and it makes refutable predictions. Many of these predictions are tested in the chapters of this book, and rejections of those predictions suggest new theories. Most of the papers modify one or two assumptions in standard theory in the direction of greater psychological realism. Often these departures are not radical at all because they relax simplifying assumptions that are not central to the economic approach. For example, there is nothing in core neoclassical theory that specifies that people should not care about fairness, that they should weight risky outcomes in a linear fashion, or that they must discount the future exponentially at a constant rate. 2 Other assumptions simply acknowledge human limits on 1 Since it is a book of advances, many of the seminal articles which influenced those collected here are not included, but are noted below and are widely reprinted elsewhere.







