Capabilities as Real Options (1998)
| Venue: | Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania |
| Citations: | 15 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@ARTICLE{Kogut98capabilitiesas,
author = {Bruce Kogut and Nalin Kulatilaka},
title = {Capabilities as Real Options},
journal = {Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania},
year = {1998},
pages = {89--99}
}
OpenURL
Abstract
many helpful discussions, the anonymous referees for their comments, and managers of Lucent Strategy research consists of a balance between positive and normative theory. Normative theories suggest particular heuristics, or cognitive representations, to find appropriate solutions. Heuristics permit faster solutions to real-time problems; they also suffer from the potential of negative transfer to inappropriate applications. The theory of real options provides an appropriate heuristic framing of competencies and exploratory search. A real options approach marries the theory of financial options to foundational ideas in strategy, organizational theory, and complex systems. We join these approaches to identify three pairs of concepts: scarce factor and the underlying asset in option theory, inertia and irreversibility, and the ruggedness of landscape and option values. Strategic theories of resources largely define a core competence as unique and non-immutable. In doing so, this definition has wrongly forgotten Barney’s initial insight into scarce factor markets as determining the valuation of a competitive asset. Financial theory of real options derives its heuristics of investing in exploratory search by inferring future value of today’s investments from







