Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth (2005)
| Venue: | In Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. Philippe Aghion and Stephen Durlauf |
| Citations: | 44 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Acemoglu05institutionsas,
author = {Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson and James Robinson and Leopoldo Fergusson and Pablo Querubín and Barry Weingast For},
title = {Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth},
booktitle = {In Handbook of Economic Growth, ed. Philippe Aghion and Stephen Durlauf},
year = {2005},
pages = {385--472},
publisher = {Elsevier}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
their helpful suggestions. This paper develops the empirical and theoretical case that differences in economic institutions are the fundamental cause of differences in economic development. We first document the empirical importance of institutions by focusing on two “quasi-natural experiments” in history, the division of Korea into two parts with very different economic institutions and the colonization of much of the world by European powers starting in the fifteenth century. We then develop the basic outline of a framework for thinking about why economic institutions differ across countries. Economic institutions determine the incentives of and the constraints on economic actors, and shape economic outcomes. As such, they are social decisions, chosen for their consequences. Because different groups and individuals typically benefit fromdifferent economic institutions, there is generally aconflict over these social choices, ultimately resolved in favor of groups with greater political power. The distribution of political power in society is in turn determined by political institutions and the distribution of resources. Political institutions allocate de







