Abstract

Recently several local hill-climbing procedures for propositional satisability havebeen proposed, which are able to solve large and di cult problems beyond the reach ofconventional algorithms like Davis-Putnam. By the introduction of some new variants of these procedures, we provide strong experimental evidence to support the conjecture that neither greediness nor randomness is important in these procedures. One of the variants introduced seems to o er signi cant improvements over earlier procedures. In addition, we investigate experimentally how their performance depends on their parameters. Our results suggest that run-time scales less than simply exponentially in the problem size. 1

Citations