The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) Framework: Toward Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning (2010)
Cached
Download Links
| Citations: | 2 - 1 self |
BibTeX
@MISC{Koedinger10theknowledge-learning-instruction,
author = {Kenneth R. Koedinger and Albert T. Corbett and Charles Perfetti},
title = {The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction (KLI) Framework: Toward Bridging the Science-Practice Chasm to Enhance Robust Student Learning},
year = {2010}
}
OpenURL
Abstract
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Keywords: computational modeling, cognitive modeling, instructional theory, machine learning, learning science, second language learning, mathematics learning, science learning, robust learning, learning theory, knowledge componentsExecutive Summary The volume of research on learning and instruction is enormous. Yet progress in improving educational outcomes has been slow at best. Many learning science results have not been translated into general practice and it appears that most that have been fielded have not yielded significant results in randomized control trials. Addressing the chasm between learning science and educational practice will require massive efforts from many constituencies, but one of these efforts is to develop a theoretical framework that permits a more systematic accumulation of the relevant research base. A key piece in such a theoretical framework is the development of levels of analyses that are fine enough to be supported by cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience, but also at levels appropriate to guide the design of effective educational practices. An ideal scientific solution would be a small set of universal instructional principles that can be applied to produce efficient







