A Critique of Standard ML (1992)
Cached
Download Links
- [plaslab.cis.nctu.edu.tw]
- [www.dcs.ed.ac.uk]
- [www.dcs.ed.ac.uk]
- [www.cs.princeton.edu]
- [www.cs.pdx.edu]
- DBLP
Other Repositories/Bibliography
by
Andrew W. Appel
| Citations: | 89 - 4 self |
BibTeX
@MISC{Appel92acritique,
author = {Andrew W. Appel},
title = {A Critique of Standard ML},
year = {1992}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
Standard ML is an excellent language for many kinds of programming. It is safe, efficient, suitably abstract, and concise. There are many aspects of the language that work well. However, nothing is perfect: Standard ML has a few shortcomings. In some cases there are obvious solutions, and in other cases further research is required.







