Abstract

Uncertainty in poker stems from two key sources, the shuffled deck and an adversary whose strategy is unknown. One approach to playing poker is to find a pessimistic game-theoretic solution (i.e., a Nash equilibrium), but human players have idiosyncratic weaknesses that can be exploited if some model or counterstrategy can be learned by observing their play. However, games against humans last for at most a few hundred hands, so learning must be very fast to be useful. We explore two approaches to opponent modelling in the context of Kuhn poker, a small game for which game-theoretic solutions are known. Parameter estimation and expert algorithms are both studied. Experiments demonstrate that, even in this small game, convergence to maximally exploitive solutions in a small number of hands is impractical, but that good (e.g., better than Nash) performance can be achieved in as few as 50 hands. Finally, we show that amongst a set of strategies with equal game-theoretic value, in particular the set of Nash equilibrium strategies, some are preferable because they speed learning of the opponent’s strategy by exploring it more effectively. 1

Citations