A Low-Radix and Low-Diameter 3D Interconnection Network Design (2009)
| Venue: | In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture |
| Citations: | 2 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Xu09alow-radix,
author = {Yi Xu and Bo Zhao and Xiuyi Zhou and Youtao Zhang and Jun Yang},
title = {A Low-Radix and Low-Diameter 3D Interconnection Network Design},
booktitle = {In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture},
year = {2009},
pages = {30--42}
}
OpenURL
Abstract
Interconnection plays an important role in performance and power of CMP designs using deep sub-micron technology. The network-on-chip (NoCs) has been proposed as a scalable and high-bandwidth fabric for interconnect design. The advent of the 3D technology has provided further opportunity to reduce on-chip communication delay. However, the design of the 3D NoC topologies has important distinctions from 2D NoCs or off-chip interconnection networks. First, current 3D stacking technology allows only vertical inter-layer links. Hence, there cannot be direct connections between arbitrary nodes in different layers — the vertical connection topology are essentially fixed. Second, the 3D NoC is highly constrained by the complexity and power of routers and links. Hence, low-radix routers are preferred over high-radix routers for lower power and better heat dissipation. This implies long network latency due to high hop counts in network paths. In this paper, we design a low-diameter 3D network using low-radix routers. Our topology leverages long wires to connect remote intra-layer nodes. We take advantage of the start-of-the-art one-hop vertical communication design and utilize lateral long wires to shorten network paths. Effectively, we implement a small-to-medium sized clique network in different layers of a 3D chip. The resulting topology generates a diameter of 3-hop only network, using routers of the same radix as 3D mesh routers. The proposed network shows up to 29 % of network latency reduction, up to 10 % throughput improvement, and up to 24 % energy reduction, when compared to a 3D mesh network. 1.







