The complexity of analog computation
| Venue: | in Math. and Computers in Simulation 28(1986 |
| Citations: | 33 - 0 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Vergis_thecomplexity,
author = {Anastasios Vergis and Kenneth Steiglitz},
title = {The complexity of analog computation},
booktitle = {in Math. and Computers in Simulation 28(1986},
year = {},
pages = {91--113}
}
Years of Citing Articles
OpenURL
Abstract
We ask if analog computers can solve NP-complete problems efficiently. Regarding this as unlikely, we formulate a strong version of Church’s Thesis: that any analog computer can be simulated efficiently (in polynomial time) by a digital computer. From this assumption and the assumption that P ≠ NP we can draw conclusions about the operation of physical devices used for computation. An NP-complete problem, 3-SAT, is reduced to the problem of checking whether a feasible point is a local optimum of an optimization problem. A mechanical device is proposed for the solution of this problem. It encodes variables as shaft angles and uses gears and smooth cams. If we grant Strong Church’s Thesis, that P ≠ NP, and a certain ‘‘Downhill Principle’ ’ governing the physical behavior of the machine, we conclude that it cannot operate successfully while using only polynomial resources. We next prove Strong Church’s Thesis for a class of analog computers described by well-behaved ordinary differential equations, which we can take as representing part of classical mechanics. We conclude with a comment on the recently discovered connection between spin glasses and combinatorial optimization. 1.







