• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

What good are positive emotions (1998)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.unc.edu]
  • [appreciativeinquiry.case.edu]
  • [www.unc.edu]
  • [www.carolinemiller.com]
  • [appreciativeinquiry.case.edu]
  • [www.unc.edu]
  • [gruberpeplab.com]
  • [www.gruberpeplab.com]
  • [gruberpeplab.com]
  • [cds.web.unc.edu]
  • [mina.education.ucsb.edu]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Barbara L. Fredrickson
Venue:Review of General Psychology
Citations:454 - 15 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@ARTICLE{Fredrickson98whatgood,
    author = {Barbara L. Fredrickson},
    title = {What good are positive emotions},
    journal = {Review of General Psychology},
    year = {1998},
    volume = {2},
    pages = {300--319}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

This article opens by noting that positive emotions do not fit existing models of emotions. Consequently, a new model is advanced to describe the form and function of a subset of positive emotions, including joy, interest, contentment, and love. This new model posits that these positive emotions serve to broaden an individual's momentary thought-action repertoire, which in turn has the effect of building that individual's physical, intellectual, and social resources. Empirical evidence to support this broaden-and-build model of positive emotions is reviewed, and implications for emotion regulation and health promotion are discussed. Even though research on emotions has this new perspective are featured. My hope is flourished in recent years, investigations that that this article will unlock scientific curiosity expressly target positive emotions remain few about positive emotions, not only to test the and far between. Any review of the psychologi- ideas presented here, but also to build other new cal literature on emotions will show that models that might illuminate the nature and psychologists have typically favored negative value of positive emotions. Psychology sorely emotions in theory building and hypothesis needs more studies on positive emotions, not testing. In so doing, psychologists have inadver- simply to level the uneven knowledge bases tently marginalized the emotions, such as joy, between negative and positive emotions, but interest, contentment, and love, that share a more critically, to guide applications and pleasant subjective feel. To date, then, psycholo- interventions that might improve individual and gy's knowledge base regarding positive emo- collective functioning, psychological welltions is so thin that satisfying answers to the question "What good are positive emotions?" have yet to be articulated. This is unfortunate. being, and physical health. Experiences of positive emotion are central to Why Have Positive Emotions human nature and contribute richly to the quality of people's lives (Diener & Larsen, Been Marginalized? 1993; Myers & Diener, 1995). But how? In At this point, it might be useful to inspect

Keyphrases

positive emotion    health promotion    positive emotion human nature    new model posit    knowledge base    diener larsen    empirical evidence    hypothesis need    psycholo intervention    scientific curiosity    theory building    physical health    pleasant subjective feel    momentary thought-action repertoire    new cal literature    psychological welltions    uneven knowledge base    psychologi idea    new model    positive emo collective functioning    psychology sorely emotion    broaden-and-build model    new perspective    negative value    question quot    recent year    myers diener    emotion regulation    social resource   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University