H.(2004), A comparison of two different approaches to morphological analysis of dutch (2004)
| Venue: | Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology |
| Citations: | 5 - 3 self |
BibTeX
@INPROCEEDINGS{Pauw04h.(2004),a,
author = {Guy De Pauw and Tom Laureys and Walter Daelemans and Hugo Van Hamme},
title = {H.(2004), A comparison of two different approaches to morphological analysis of dutch},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Seventh Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology},
year = {2004},
pages = {62--69}
}
Years of Citing Articles
Bookmark
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
OpenURL
Abstract
This paper compares two systems for computational morphological analysis of Dutch. Both systems have been independently designed as separate modules in the context of the FLa-VoR project, which aims to develop a modular architecture for automatic speech recognition. The systems are trained and tested on the same Dutch morphological database (CELEX), and can thus be objectively compared as morphological analyzers in their own right. 1
Citations
| 377 | Two-level morphology: a general computational model for word-form recognition and production - Koskenniemi - 1983 |
| 240 | Timbl: Tilburg memory based learner, version 3.0, reference guide - Daelemans, Zavrel, et al. - 2000 |
| 119 | Two decades of statistical language modeling: Where do we go from here - Rosenfeld |
| 40 | Memory-based morphological analysis - Bosch, Daelemans - 1999 |
| 14 | FlaVoR: A flexible architecture for LVCSR - Demuynck, Laureys, et al. - 2003 |
| 12 | A probabilistic context-free grammar for disambiguation in morphological parsing - Heemskerk - 1993 |
| 3 | editors. 2003. Finite State Morphology - Beesley, Karttunen |
| 3 | A hybrid approach to compounds in LVCSR - Laureys, Pauw, et al. - 2002 |
