• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

More efficiency in multiple kernel learning (2007)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.di.ens.fr]
  • [www.research.microsoft.com]
  • [research.microsoft.com]
  • [imls.engr.oregonstate.edu]
  • [asi.insa-rouen.fr]
  • [www.hds.utc.fr]
  • [www.machinelearning.org]
  • [www.idiap.ch]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Alain Rakotomamonjy , Stéphane Canu
Venue:In ICML
Citations:38 - 3 self
  • Summary
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Rakotomamonjy07moreefficiency,
    author = {Alain Rakotomamonjy and Stéphane Canu},
    title = {More efficiency in multiple kernel learning},
    booktitle = {In ICML},
    year = {2007},
    pages = {775--782},
    publisher = {Omnipress}
}

Bookmark

citeulike Connotea Bibsonomy Del.icio.us Digg Reddit

OpenURL

 

Abstract

An efficient and general multiple kernel learning (MKL) algorithm has been recently proposed by Sonnenburg et al. (2006). This approach has opened new perspectives since it makes the MKL approach tractable for largescale problems, by iteratively using existing support vector machine code. However, it turns out that this iterative algorithm needs several iterations before converging towards a reasonable solution. In this paper, we address the MKL problem through an adaptive 2-norm regularization formulation. Weights on each kernel matrix are included in the standard SVM empirical risk minimization problem with a ℓ1 constraint to encourage sparsity. We propose an algorithm for solving this problem and provide an new insight on MKL algorithms based on block 1-norm regularization by showing that the two approaches are equivalent. Experimental results show that the resulting algorithm converges rapidly and its efficiency compares favorably to other MKL algorithms. 1.

Citations

1512 Smola A: Learning with Kernels - Schölkopf - 2002
366 Learning the Kernel Matrix with Semidefinite Programming - Lanckriet, Cristianini, et al.
168 Multiple kernel learning, conic duality - Bach, Lanckriet, et al. - 2004
129 Large scale multiple kernel learning - Sonnenberg, Rätsch, et al. - 2006
81 A statistical framework for genomic data fusion - Lanckriet - 2004
57 Learning the kernel function via regularization - Micchelli, Pontil
55 Numerical Optimization Theoretical and Practical Aspects - Bonnans, Gilbert, et al. - 2003
41 Practical aspects of the Moreau–Yosida regularization: Theoretical preliminaries - Lemaréchal, Sagastizábal - 1997
34 Adaptive scaling for feature selection in svms - Grandvalet, Canu - 2002
26 Least absolute shrinkage is equivalent to quadratic penalization - Grandvalet - 1998
25 Alpha seeding for support vector machines - DeCoste, Wagstaff - 2000
7 Optimization problems with pertubation : A guided tour - Bonnans, Shapiro - 1998
6 Choosing multiple parameters for SVM - Chapelle, Vapnik, et al. - 2002
1 Convex multi-task feature learning (Technical Report - Argyriou, Evgeniou, et al. - 2007
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University