• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Tractable inference for complex stochastic processes (1998)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [ai.stanford.edu]
  • [www.eecs.harvard.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [ai.stanford.edu]
  • [www.eecs.harvard.edu]
  • [deas.harvard.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [robotics.stanford.edu]
  • [www.cis.upenn.edu]

  • Other Repositories/Bibliography

  • DBLP
  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Xavier Boyen
Venue:In Proc. UAI
Citations:300 - 14 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@INPROCEEDINGS{Boyen98tractableinference,
    author = {Xavier Boyen},
    title = {Tractable inference for complex stochastic processes},
    booktitle = {In Proc. UAI},
    year = {1998},
    pages = {33--42}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

The monitoring and control of any dynamic system depends crucially on the ability to reason about its current status and its future trajectory. In the case of a stochastic system, these tasks typically involve the use of a belief state—a probability distribution over the state of the process at a given point in time. Unfortunately, the state spaces of complex processes are very large, making an explicit representation of a belief state intractable. Even in dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs), where the process itself can be represented compactly, the representation of the belief state is intractable. We investigate the idea of maintaining a compact approximation to the true belief state, and analyze the conditions under which the errors due to the approximations taken over the lifetime of the process do not accumulate to make our answers completely irrelevant. We show that the error in a belief state contracts exponentially as the process evolves. Thus, even with multiple approximations, the error in our process remains bounded indefinitely. We show how the additional structure of a DBN can be used to design our approximation scheme, improving its performance significantly. We demonstrate the applicability of our ideas in the context of a monitoring task, showing that orders of magnitude faster inference can be achieved with only a small degradation in accuracy. 1

Keyphrases

tractable inference    complex stochastic process    belief state    dynamic system    small degradation    state space    explicit representation    multiple approximation    future trajectory    dynamic bayesian network    belief state contract    current status    monitoring task    true belief state    probability distribution    approximation scheme    stochastic system    compact approximation    complex process    additional structure   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University