• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations

DMCA

Optimal Multi-Step k-Nearest Neighbor Search (1998)

Cached

  • Download as a PDF

Download Links

  • [www.cs.umn.edu]
  • [www.dbs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de]
  • [www-db.deis.unibo.it]
  • [www.dbs.informatik.uni-muenchen.de]
  • [www.dbs.ifi.lmu.de]
  • [www2.ee.ntu.edu.tw]

  • Save to List
  • Add to Collection
  • Correct Errors
  • Monitor Changes
by Thomas Seidl , Hans-Peter Kriegel
Citations:205 - 23 self
  • Summary
  • Citations
  • Active Bibliography
  • Co-citation
  • Clustered Documents
  • Version History

BibTeX

@MISC{Seidl98optimalmulti-step,
    author = {Thomas Seidl and Hans-Peter Kriegel},
    title = { Optimal Multi-Step k-Nearest Neighbor Search},
    year = {1998}
}

Share

Facebook Twitter Reddit Bibsonomy

OpenURL

 

Abstract

For an increasing number of modern database applica-tions, efficient support of similarity search becomes an important task. Along with the complexity of the objects such as images, molecules and mechanical parts, also the complexity of the similarity models increases more and more. Whereas algorithms that are directly based on in-dexes work well for simple medium-dimensional similar-ity distance functions, they do not meet the efficiency re-quirements of complex high-dimensional and adaptable distance functions. The use of a multi-step query process-ing strategy is recommended in these cases, and our in-vestigations substantiate that the number of candidates which are produced in the filter step and exactly evalu-ated in the refinement step is a fundamental efficiency parameter. After revealing the strong performance shortcomings of the state-of-the-art algorithm for k-nearest neighbor search [Korn et al. 19961, we present a novel multi-step algorithm which is guaranteed to pro-duce the minimum number of candidates. Experimental evaluations demonstrate the significant performance gain over the previous solution, and we observed average improvement factors of up to 120 for the number of can-didates and up to 48 for the total runtime.

Keyphrases

in-vestigations substantiate    minimum number    strong performance shortcoming    experimental evaluation    efficiency re-quirements    similarity search    important task    significant performance gain    filter step    novel multi-step algorithm    modern database applica-tions    fundamental efficiency parameter    average improvement factor    multi-step query process-ing strategy    adaptable distance function    efficient support    state-of-the-art algorithm    simple medium-dimensional similar-ity distance function    similarity model    in-dexes work    mechanical part    previous solution    refinement step    k-nearest neighbor search korn    total runtime   

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University