• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Other Seers ▼
    RefSeer AckSeer CollabSeer SeerSeer
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

On the relationship between MCMC model uncertainty methods (1997)

by Simon J. Godsill
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 6 of 6

Bayesian Model Averaging: A Tutorial

by Jennifer A. Hoeting , David Madigan, Adrian E. Raftery, Chris T. Volinsky - STATISTICAL SCIENCE , 1999
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 83 (3 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo

by Peter J. Green , 2003
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 35 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

MCMC Methods for Computing Bayes Factors: A Comparative Review

by Cong Han, Bradley P. Carlin - Journal of the American Statistical Association , 2000
"... this paper we review several of these methods, and subsequently compare them in the context of two examples, the first a simple regression example, and the second a much more challenging hierarchical longitudinal model of the kind often encountered in biostatistical practice. We find that the joint ..."
Abstract - Cited by 25 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
this paper we review several of these methods, and subsequently compare them in the context of two examples, the first a simple regression example, and the second a much more challenging hierarchical longitudinal model of the kind often encountered in biostatistical practice. We find that the joint model-parameter space search methods perform adequately but can be difficult to program and tune, while the marginal likelihood methods are often less troublesome and require less in the way of additional coding. Our results suggest that the latter methods may be most appropriate for practitioners working in many standard model choice settings, while the former remain important for comparing large numbers of models, or models whose parameters cannot be easily updated in relatively few blocks. We caution however that all of the methods we compare require significant human and computer effort, suggesting that less formal Bayesian model choice methods may offer a more realistic alternative in many cases.

Bayesian Curve Fitting Using MCMC With Applications to Signal Segmentation

by Elena Punskaya, Christophe Andrieu, Arnaud Doucet, William J. Fitzgerald - IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , 2002
"... We propose some Bayesian methods to address the problem of fitting a signal modeled by a sequence of piecewise constant linear (in the parameters) regression models, for example, autoregressive or Volterra models. A joint prior distribution is set up over the number of the changepoints/knots, their ..."
Abstract - Cited by 17 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
We propose some Bayesian methods to address the problem of fitting a signal modeled by a sequence of piecewise constant linear (in the parameters) regression models, for example, autoregressive or Volterra models. A joint prior distribution is set up over the number of the changepoints/knots, their positions, and over the orders of the linear regression models within each segment if these are unknown. Hierarchical priors are developed and, as the resulting posterior probability distributions and Bayesian estimators do not admit closed-form analytical expressions, reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are derived to estimate these quantities. Results are obtained for standard denoising and segmentation of speech data problems that have already been examined in the literature. These results demonstrate the performance of our methods.

Bayesian Meta-Analysis for Longitudinal Data Models using Multivariate Mixture Priors

by Hedibert Freitas Lopes, Peter Müller, Gary L. Rosner , 2002
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 5 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

A Gabor regression scheme for audio signal analysis

by Patrick J. Wolfe, Simon J. Godsill - in Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics
"... Here we describe novel Bayesian models for time-frequency analysis of non-stationary audio waveforms. These models are based on the idea of a Gabor regression, in which a time series is represented as a superposition of time-frequency shifted versions of a simple window function. Prior distributions ..."
Abstract - Cited by 1 (1 self) - Add to MetaCart
Here we describe novel Bayesian models for time-frequency analysis of non-stationary audio waveforms. These models are based on the idea of a Gabor regression, in which a time series is represented as a superposition of time-frequency shifted versions of a simple window function. Prior distributions over the corresponding time-frequency coefficients are constructed in a manner which favours both smoothness of the estimated function and sparseness of the coefficient representation (either indirectly through scale mixtures of normals, or directly through prior probability mass at zero). In this way prior regularisation may induce a parsimonious, meaningful representation of the underlying audio time series. 1. THE DISCRETE-TIME GABOR EXPANSION The discrete-time Gabor expansion of a periodic sequence f ∈ ℓ 2 (Z) having period L is given by f = M−1 � N−1 � m=0 n=0
The National Science Foundation
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2010 The Pennsylvania State University