This is a description of TPS, a theorem proving system for classical type theory (Church’s typed λ-calculus). TPS has been designed to be a general research tool for manipulating wffs of first- and higher-order logic, and searching for proofs of such wffs interactively or automatically, or in a combination of these modes. An important feature of TPS is the ability to translate between expansion proofs and natural deduction proofs. Examples of theorems which TPS can prove completely automatically are given to illustrate certain aspects of TPS’s behavior and problems of theorem proving in higher-order logic. 7

In this paper, a resolution method for propositional temporal logic is presented. Temporal formulae, incorporating both past-time and future-time temporal operators, are converted to Separated Normal Form (SNF), then both non-temporal and temporal resolution rules are applied. The resolution method is based on classical resolution, but incorporates a temporal resolution rule that can be implemented efficiently using a graph-theoretic approach. 1 Introduction This report describes a resolution procedure for discrete, linear, propositional temporal logic. This logic incorporates both past-time and future-time temporal operators and its models consist of sequences of states, each sequence having finite past and infinite future. A naive application of the classical resolution rule to temporal logics fails as two complementary literals may not represent a contradictory formula, depending on their temporal context. Because of such problems with resolution, the majority of the decision meth...

. This paper presents an overview of the development of the field of temporal and modal logic programming. We review temporal and modal logic programming languages under three headings: (1) languages based on interval logic, (2) languages based on temporal logic, and (3) languages based on (multi)modal logics. The overview includes most of the major results developed, and points out some of the similarities, and the differences, between languages and systems based on diverse temporal and modal logics. The paper concludes with a brief summary and discussion. Categories: Temporal and Modal Logic Programming. 1 Introduction In logic programming, a program is a set of Horn clauses representing our knowledge and assumptions about some problem. The semantics of logic programs as developed by van Emden and Kowalski [96] is based on the notion of the least (minimum) Herbrand model and its fixed-point characterization. As logic programming has been applied to a growing number of problem domai...

Researchers in artificial intelligence have recently been taking great interest in hybrid representations, among them sorted logics---logics that link a traditional logical representation to a taxonomic (or sort) representation such as those prevalent in semantic networks. This paper introduces a general framework---the substitutional framework---for integrating logical deduction and sortal deduction to form a deductive system for sorted logic. This paper also presents results that provide the theoretical underpinnings of the framework. A distinguishing characteristic of a deductive system that is structured according to the substitutional framework is that the sort subsystem is invoked only when the logic subsystem performs unification, and thus sort information is used only in determining what substitutions to make for variables. Unlike every other known approach to sorted deduction, the substitutional framework provides for a systematic transformation of unsorted deductive systems ...

A strong analytic tableau calculus is presentend for the most common normal modal logics. The method combines the advantages of both sequent-like tableaux and prefixed tableaux. Proper rules are used, instead of complex closure operations for the accessibility relation, while non determinism and cut rules, used by sequent-like tableaux, are totally eliminated. A strong completeness theorem without cut is also given for symmetric and euclidean logics. The system gains the same modularity of Hilbert-style formulations, where the addition or deletion of rules is the way to change logic. Since each rule has to consider only adjacent possible worlds, the calculus also gains efficiency. Moreover, the rules satisfy the strong Church Rosser property and can thus be fully parallelized. Termination properties and a general algorithm are devised. The propositional modal logics thus treated are K, D, T, KB, K4, K5, K45, KDB, D4, KD5, KD45, B, S4, S5, OM, OB, OK4, OS4, OM + , OB + , OK4 + ,...

A general framework for translating logical formulae from one logic into another logic is presented. The framework is instantiated with two different approaches to translating modal logic formulae into predicate logic. The first one, the well known ‘relational’ translation makes the modal logic’s possible worlds structure explicit by introducing a distinguished predicate symbol to represent the accessibility relation. In the second approach, the ‘functional ’ translation method, paths in the possible worlds structure are represented by compositions of functions which map worlds to accessible worlds. On the syntactic level this means that every flexible symbol is parametrized with particular terms denoting whole paths from the initial world to the actual world. The ‘target logic’ for the translation is a first-order many-sorted logic with built in equality. Therefore the ‘source logic’ may also be first-order many-sorted with built in equality. Furthermore flexible function symbols are allowed. The modal operators may be parametrized with arbitrary terms and particular properties of the accessibility relation may be specified within the

A resolution based proof system for a temporal logic of knowledge is presented and shown to be correct. Such logics are useful for proving properties of distributed and multi-agent systems. Examples are given to illustrate the proof system. An extension of the basic system to the multimodal case is given and illustrated using the `muddy children problem'. 1 Introduction Temporal logics have been shown to have many applications in computer science and artificial intelligence. For example, they are used in the specification and verification of reactive systems [28], in temporal query languages [8], executable logics [18] and for reasoning about action [36]. For some applications, however, logics containing connectives that operate over just the one modal dimension of time do not provide sufficient expressive power. For such applications, it is necessary to provide connectives that allow us to represent the properties of different modal dimensions in the same logic. In this paper, we co...

We show how labelled deductive systems can be combined with a logical framework to provide a natural deduction implementation of a large and well-known class of propositional modal logics (including K, D, T , B, S4, S4:2, KD45, S5). Our approach is modular and based on a separation between a base logic and a labelling algebra, which interact through a fixed interface. While the base logic stays fixed, different modal logics are generated by plugging in appropriate algebras. This leads to a hierarchical structuring of modal logics with inheritance of theorems. Moreover, it allows modular correctness proofs, both with respect to soundness and completeness for semantics, and faithfulness and adequacy of the implementation. We also investigate the tradeoffs in possible labelled presentations: We show that a narrow interface between the base logic and the labelling algebra supports modularity and provides an attractive proof-theory (in comparision to, e.g., semantic embedding) but limits th...

We present a proof method for intuitionistic logic based on Wallen’s matrix characterization. Our approach combines the connection calculus and the sequent calculus. The search technique is based on notions of paths and connections and thus avoids redundancies in the search space. During the proof search the computed first-order and intuitionistic substitutions are used to simultaneously construct a sequent proof which is more human oriented than the matrix proof. This allows to use our method within interactive proof environments. Furthermore we can consider local substitutions instead of global ones and treat substitutions occurring in different branches of the sequent proof independently. This reduces the number of extra copies of formulae to be considered.

For an efficient proof search in non-classical logics, particular in intuitionistic and modal logics, two similar approaches have been established: Wallen’s matrix characterization and Ohlbach’s resolution calculus. Beside the usual term-unification both methods require a specialized string-unification to unify the so-called prefixes of atomic formulae (in Wallen’s notation) or world-paths (in Ohlbach’s notation). For this purpose we present an efficient algorithm, called T-String-Unification, which computes a minimal set of most general unifiers. By transforming systems of equations we obtain an elegant unification procedure, which is applicable to the intuitionistic logic J and the modal logic S4. With some modifications we are able to treat the modal logics D, K, D4, K4, S5, and T. We explain our method by an intuitive graphical presentation, prove correctness, completeness, minimality, and termination and investigate its complexity.