Results 1  10
of
16
Using Typed Lambda Calculus to Implement Formal Systems on a Machine
 Journal of Automated Reasoning
, 1992
"... this paper and the LF. In particular the idea of having an operator T : Prop ! Type appears already in De Bruijn's earlier work, as does the idea of having several judgements. The paper [24] describes the basic features of the LF. In this paper we are going to provide a broader illustration of its a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 83 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper and the LF. In particular the idea of having an operator T : Prop ! Type appears already in De Bruijn's earlier work, as does the idea of having several judgements. The paper [24] describes the basic features of the LF. In this paper we are going to provide a broader illustration of its applicability and discuss to what extent it is successful. The analysis (of the formal presentation) of a system carried out through encoding often illuminates the system itself. This paper will also deal with this phenomenon.
Subtyping Dependent Types
, 2000
"... The need for subtyping in typesystems with dependent types has been realized for some years. But it is hard to prove that systems combining the two features have fundamental properties such as subject reduction. Here we investigate a subtyping extension of the system *P, which is an abstract versio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 70 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The need for subtyping in typesystems with dependent types has been realized for some years. But it is hard to prove that systems combining the two features have fundamental properties such as subject reduction. Here we investigate a subtyping extension of the system *P, which is an abstract version of the type system of the Edinburgh Logical Framework LF. By using an equivalent formulation, we establish some important properties of the new system *P^, including subject reduction. Our analysis culminates in a complete and terminating algorithm which establishes the decidability of typechecking.
Implementing the MetaTheory of Deductive Systems
 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automated Deduction
, 1992
"... . We exhibit a methodology for formulating and verifying metatheorems about deductive systems in the Elf language, an implementation of the LF Logical Framework with an operational semantics in the spirit of logic programming. It is based on the mechanical verification of properties of transformatio ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We exhibit a methodology for formulating and verifying metatheorems about deductive systems in the Elf language, an implementation of the LF Logical Framework with an operational semantics in the spirit of logic programming. It is based on the mechanical verification of properties of transformations between deductions, which relies on type reconstruction and schemachecking. The latter is justified by induction principles for closed LF objects, which can be constructed over a given signature. We illustrate our technique through several examples, the most extensive of which is an interpretation of classical logic in minimal logic through a continuationpassingstyle transformation on proofs. 1 Introduction Formal deductive systems have become an important tool in computer science. They are used to specify logics, type systems, operational semantics and other aspects of languages. The role of such specifications is threefold. Firstly, inference rules serve as a highlevel notation w...
Hoare Logic and VDM: MachineChecked Soundness and Completeness Proofs
, 1998
"... Investigating soundness and completeness of verification calculi for imperative programming languages is a challenging task. Many incorrect results have been published in the past. We take advantage of the computeraided proof tool LEGO to interactively establish soundness and completeness of both H ..."
Abstract

Cited by 31 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Investigating soundness and completeness of verification calculi for imperative programming languages is a challenging task. Many incorrect results have been published in the past. We take advantage of the computeraided proof tool LEGO to interactively establish soundness and completeness of both Hoare Logic and the operation decomposition rules of the Vienna Development Method (VDM) with respect to operational semantics. We deal with parameterless recursive procedures and local variables in the context of total correctness. As a case study, we use LEGO to verify the correctness of Quicksort in Hoare Logic. As our main contribution, we illuminate the rle of auxiliary variables in Hoare Logic. They are required to relate the value of program variables in the final state with the value of program variables in the initial state. In our formalisation, we reflect their purpose by interpreting assertions as relations on states and a domain of auxiliary variables. Furthermore, we propose a new structural rule for adjusting auxiliary variables when strengthening preconditions and weakening postconditions. This rule is stronger than all previously suggested structural rules, including rules of adaptation. With the new treatment, we are able to show that, contrary to common belief, Hoare Logic subsumes VDM in that every derivation in VDM can be naturally embedded in Hoare Logic. Moreover, we establish completeness results uniformly as corollaries of Most General Formula theorems which remove the need to reason about arbitrary assertions.
Extensions and Applications of Higherorder Unification
, 1990
"... ... unification problems. Then, in this framework, we develop a new unification algorithm for acalculus with dependent function (II) types. This algorithm is especially useful as it provides for mechanization in the very expressive Logical Framework (LF). The development (objectlanguages). The ric ..."
Abstract

Cited by 25 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
... unification problems. Then, in this framework, we develop a new unification algorithm for acalculus with dependent function (II) types. This algorithm is especially useful as it provides for mechanization in the very expressive Logical Framework (LF). The development (objectlanguages). The rich structure of a typedcalculus,asopposedtotraditional,rst generalideaistouseacalculusasametalanguageforrepresentingvariousotherlanguages thelattercase,thealgorithmisincomplete,thoughstillquiteusefulinpractice. Thelastpartofthedissertationprovidesexamplesoftheusefulnessofthealgorithms.The algorithmrstfordependentproduct()types,andsecondforimplicitpolymorphism.In involvessignicantcomplicationsnotarisingHuet'scorrespondingalgorithmforthesimply orderabstractsyntaxtrees,allowsustoexpressrules,e.g.,programtransformationand typedcalculus,primarilybecauseitmustdealwithilltypedterms.Wethenextendthis Wecanthenuseunicationinthemetalanguagetomechanizeapplicationoftheserules.
Deliverables: A Categorical Approach to Program Development in Type Theory
, 1992
"... This thesis considers the problem of program correctness within a rich theory of dependent types, the Extended Calculus of Constructions (ECC). This system contains a powerful programming language of higherorder primitive recursion and higherorder intuitionistic logic. It is supported by Pollack's ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This thesis considers the problem of program correctness within a rich theory of dependent types, the Extended Calculus of Constructions (ECC). This system contains a powerful programming language of higherorder primitive recursion and higherorder intuitionistic logic. It is supported by Pollack's versatile LEGO implementation, which I use extensively to develop the mathematical constructions studied here. I systematically investigate Burstall's notion of deliverable, that is, a program paired with a proof of correctness. This approach separates the concerns of programming and logic, since I want a simple program extraction mechanism. The \Sigmatypes of the calculus enable us to achieve this. There are many similarities with the subset interpretation of MartinLof type theory. I show that deliverables have a rich categorical structure, so that correctness proofs may be decomposed in a principled way. The categorical combinators which I define in the system package up much logical bo...
Nominal logic programming
, 2006
"... Nominal logic is an extension of firstorder logic which provides a simple foundation for formalizing and reasoning about abstract syntax modulo consistent renaming of bound names (that is, αequivalence). This article investigates logic programming based on nominal logic. This technique is especial ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Nominal logic is an extension of firstorder logic which provides a simple foundation for formalizing and reasoning about abstract syntax modulo consistent renaming of bound names (that is, αequivalence). This article investigates logic programming based on nominal logic. This technique is especially wellsuited for prototyping type systems, proof theories, operational semantics rules, and other formal systems in which bound names are present. In many cases, nominal logic programs are essentially literal translations of “paper” specifications. As such, nominal logic programming provides an executable specification language for prototyping, communicating, and experimenting with formal systems. We describe some typical nominal logic programs, and develop the modeltheoretic, prooftheoretic, and operational semantics of such programs. Besides being of interest for ensuring the correct behavior of implementations, these results provide a rigorous foundation for techniques for analysis and reasoning about nominal logic programs, as we illustrate via two examples.
An Overview of the Edinburgh Logical Framework
 In Current Trends in Hardware Verification and Automated Theorem Proving, G. Birtwistle
, 1989
"... This paper serves as an introduction to the LF and summarizes the main points made in [1]. It is organized as follows. In section 2 we provide an outline of the LF specification language. This is done in somewhat more detail than is necessary on first reading. In section 3 we give a simple example o ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper serves as an introduction to the LF and summarizes the main points made in [1]. It is organized as follows. In section 2 we provide an outline of the LF specification language. This is done in somewhat more detail than is necessary on first reading. In section 3 we give a simple example of a specification. In section 4 we discuss the general LF paradigm for specifying a logical system. The subsequent sections illustrate this paradigm. Section 5 deals with modal logics, section 6 deals with various lambda calculii and in section 7 we discuss program logics. 2 The LF Specification Language
An Operational Logic of Effects
 In Proceedings of the Australasian Theory Symposium, CATS ’96
, 1996
"... In this paper we describe our progress towards an operational implementation of a modern programming logic. The logic is inspired by the variable type systems of Feferman, and is designed for reasoning about imperative functional programs. The logic goes well beyond traditional programming logics, s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we describe our progress towards an operational implementation of a modern programming logic. The logic is inspired by the variable type systems of Feferman, and is designed for reasoning about imperative functional programs. The logic goes well beyond traditional programming logics, such as Hoare's logic and Dynamic logic in its expressibility, yet is less problematic to encode into higherorder logics. The main focus of the paper is too present an axiomatization of the base firstorder theory, and an implementation of the logic into the generic proof assistant Isabelle. We also indicate the directions of our current research to blend these two advances into an operational whole. Keywords semantics, logic, derivation, verification, specification, theorem proving. 1 Introduction In this paper we continue the investigations into a Variable Typed Logic of Effects that began in [20, 11, 21, 23, 12]. In particular we present an axiomatization of the base firstorder theory...
A logical framework for software proof reuse
 Proceedings of the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability
, 1995
"... We describe a logical framework PR for verification of reusable software components. Within our system, developers can employ the advantages traditionally associated with software reuse to reduce the cost of software verification by reusing abstract proofs and specifications. One can construct an ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a logical framework PR for verification of reusable software components. Within our system, developers can employ the advantages traditionally associated with software reuse to reduce the cost of software verification by reusing abstract proofs and specifications. One can construct an algorithm with parameters, a specification with parameters, and a proof that the algorithm satisfies the specification provided the parameters satisfy certain conditions, Proofs in PR will themselves contain parameters for subproofs concerning those conditions. In this framework, typing, type checking, and proof checking are decidable. 1