Code space is a critical issue facing designers of software for embedded systems. Many traditional compiler optimizations are designed to reduce the execution time of compiled code, but not necessarily the size of the compiled code. Further, di#erent results can be achieved by running some optimizations more than once and changing the order in which optimizations are applied. Register allocation only complicates matters, as the interactions between di#erent optimizations can cause more spill code to be generated. The compiler for embedded systems, then, must take care to use the best sequence of optimizations to minimize code space.

Abstract not found

Historically, compilers have operated by applying a fixed set of optimizations in a predetermined order. We call such an ordered list of optimizations a compilation sequence. This paper describes a prototype system that uses biased random search to discover a program-specific compilation sequence that minimizes an explicit, external objective function. The result is a compiler framework that adapts its behavior to the application being compiled, to the pool of available transformations, to the objective function, and to the target machine.

This thesis presents a framework for describing optimizations. It shows how to combine two such frameworks and how to reason about the properties of the resulting framework. The structure of the framework provides insight into when a combination yields better results. Also presented is a simple iterative algorithm for solving these frameworks. A framework is shown that combines Constant Propagation, Unreachable Code Elimination, Global Congruence Finding and Global Value Numbering. For these optimizations, the iterative algorithm runs in O(n^2) time. This thesis then presents an O(n log n) algorithm for combining the same optimizations. This technique also finds many of the common subexpressions found by Partial Redundancy Elimination. However, it requires a global code motion pass to make the optimized code correct, also presented. The global code motion algorithm removes some Partially Dead Code as a side-effect. An implementation demonstrates that the algorithm has shorter compile times than repeated passes of the separate optimizations while producing run-time speedups of 4%–7%. While global analyses are stronger, peephole analyses can be unexpectedly powerful. This thesis demonstrates parse-time peephole optimizations that find more than 95% of the constants and common subexpressions found by the best combined analysis. Finding constants and common subexpressions while parsing reduces peak intermediate representation size. This speeds up the later global analyses, reducing total compilation time by 10%. In conjunction with global code motion, these peephole optimizations generate excellent code very quickly, a useful feature for compilers that stress compilation speed over code quality.

The existence of statically detectable correlation among conditional branches enables their elimination, an optimization that has a number of benefits. This paper presents techniques to determine whether an interprocedural execution path leading to a conditional branch exists along which the branch outcome is known at compile time, and then to eliminate the branch along this path through code restructuring. The technique consists of a demand driven interprocedural analysis that determines whether a specific branch outcome is correlated with prior statements or branch outcomes. The optimization is performed using a code restructuring algorithm that replicates code to separate out the paths with correlation. When the correlated path is affected by a procedure call, the restructuring is based on procedure entry splitting and exit splitting. The entry splitting transformation creates multiple entries to a procedure, and the exit splitting transformation allows a procedure to return control...

A new algorithm, SSAPRE, for performing partial redundancy elimination based entirely on SSA form is presented. It achieves optimal code motion similar to lazy code motion [KRS94a, DS93], but is formulated independently and does not involve iterative data flow analysis and bit vectors in its solution. It not only exhibits the characteristics common to other sparse approaches, but also inherits the advantages shared by other SSA-based optimization techniques. SSAPRE also maintains its output in the same SSA form as its input. In describing the algorithm, we state theorems with proofs giving our claims about SSAPRE. We also give additional description about our practical implementation of SSAPRE, and analyze and compare its performance with a bit-vector-based implementation of PRE. We conclude with some discussion of the implications of this work. 1 Introduction The Static Single Assignment Form (SSA) has become a popular program representation in optimizing compilers, because it provid...

Partial redundancy elimination (PRE), the most important component of global optimizers, generalizes the removal of common subexpressions and loop-invariant computations. Because existing PRE implementations are based on code motion, they fail to completely remove the redundancies. In fact, we observed that 73% of loop-invariant statements cannot be eliminated from loops by code motion alone. In dynamic terms, traditional PRE eliminates only half of redundancies that are strictly partial. To achieve a complete PRE, control flow restructuring must be applied. However, the resulting code duplication may cause code size explosion. This paper focuses on achieving a complete PRE while incurring an acceptable code growth. First, we present an algorithm for complete removal of partial redundancies, based on the integration of code motion and control flow restructuring. In contrast to existing complete techniques, we resort to restructuring merely to remove obstacles to code motion, rather th...

This paper presents a compiler optimization algorithm to reduce the run time overhead of array subscript range checks in programs without compromising safety. The algorithm is based on partial redundancy elimination and it incorporates previously developed algorithms for range check optimization. We implemented the algorithm in our research compiler, Nascent, and conducted experiments on a suite of 10 benchmark programs to obtain four results: (1) the execution overhead of naive range checking is high enough to merit optimization, (2) there are substantial differences between various optimizations, (3) loop-based optimizations that hoist checks out of loops are effective in eliminating about 98% of the range checks, and (4) more sophisticated analysis and optimization algorithms produce very marginal benefits. 1 Introduction Program statements that access elements of an array outside the declared array ranges introduce errors which can be difficult to detect. Since compile-time check...

This work is a textbook for an undergraduate course in compiler construction.

Static single assignment (SSA) form is a program representation becoming increasingly popular for compiler-based code optimization. In this paper, we address three problems that have arisen in our use of SSA form. Two are variations to the SSA construction algorithms presented by Cytron et al. The first variation is a version of...