Results 11 - 20
of
101
Markov Logic: A Unifying Framework for Statistical Relational Learning
- PROCEEDINGS OF THE ICML-2004 WORKSHOP ON STATISTICAL RELATIONAL LEARNING AND ITS CONNECTIONS TO OTHER FIELDS
, 2004
"... Interest in statistical relational learning (SRL) has grown rapidly in recent years. Several key SRL tasks have been identified, and a large number of approaches have been proposed. Increasingly, a ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 44 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Interest in statistical relational learning (SRL) has grown rapidly in recent years. Several key SRL tasks have been identified, and a large number of approaches have been proposed. Increasingly, a
Probabilistic combination of text classifiers using reliability indicators: Models and results
- Information Retrieval
, 2002
"... The intuition that different text classifiers behave in qualitatively different ways has long motivated attempts to build a better metaclassifier via some combination of classifiers. We introduce a probabilistic method for combining classifiers that considers the context-sensitive reliabilities of c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 39 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
The intuition that different text classifiers behave in qualitatively different ways has long motivated attempts to build a better metaclassifier via some combination of classifiers. We introduce a probabilistic method for combining classifiers that considers the context-sensitive reliabilities of contributing classifiers. The method harnesses reliability indicators—variables that provide signals about the performance of classifiers in different situations. We provide background, present procedures for building metaclassifiers that take into consideration both reliability indicators and classifier outputs, and review a set of comparative studies undertaken to evaluate the methodology.
Probabilistic models for relational data
, 2004
"... We introduce a graphical language for relational data called the probabilistic entityrelationship (PER) model. The model is an extension of the entity-relationship model, a common model for the abstract representation of database structure. We concentrate on the directed version of this model—the di ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 39 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We introduce a graphical language for relational data called the probabilistic entityrelationship (PER) model. The model is an extension of the entity-relationship model, a common model for the abstract representation of database structure. We concentrate on the directed version of this model—the directed acyclic probabilistic entity-relationship (DAPER) model. The DAPER model is closely related to the plate model and the probabilistic relational model (PRM), existing models for relational data. The DAPER model is more expressive than either existing model, and also helps to demonstrate their similarity. In addition to describing the new language, we discuss important facets of modeling relational data, including the use of restricted relationships, self relationships, and probabilistic relationships. Many examples are provided.
Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems
, 2007
"... One of the potent personalization technologies powering the adaptive web is collaborative filtering. Collaborative filtering (CF) is the process of filtering or evaluating items through the opinions of other people. CF technology brings together the opinions of large interconnected communities on ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 30 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
One of the potent personalization technologies powering the adaptive web is collaborative filtering. Collaborative filtering (CF) is the process of filtering or evaluating items through the opinions of other people. CF technology brings together the opinions of large interconnected communities on the web, supporting filtering of substantial quantities of data. In this chapter we introduce the core concepts of collaborative filtering, its primary uses for users of the adaptive web, the theory and practice of CF algorithms, and design decisions regarding rating systems and acquisition of ratings. We also discuss how to evaluate CF systems, and the evolution of rich interaction interfaces. We close the chapter with discussions of the challenges of privacy particular to a CF recommendation service and important open research questions in the field.
A new approach to collaborative filtering: Operator estimation with spectral regularization
- Journal of Machine Learning Research
"... We present a general approach for collaborative filtering (CF) using spectral regularization to learn linear operators mapping a set of “users ” to a set of possibly desired “objects”. In particular, several recent low-rank type matrix-completion methods for CF are shown to be special cases of our p ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present a general approach for collaborative filtering (CF) using spectral regularization to learn linear operators mapping a set of “users ” to a set of possibly desired “objects”. In particular, several recent low-rank type matrix-completion methods for CF are shown to be special cases of our proposed framework. Unlike existing regularization-based CF, our approach can be used to incorporate additional information such as attributes of the users/objects—a feature currently lacking in existing regularization-based CF approaches—using popular and well-known kernel methods. We provide novel representer theorems that we use to develop new estimation methods. We then provide learning algorithms based on low-rank decompositions and test them on a standard CF data set. The experiments indicate the advantages of generalizing the existing regularization-based CF methods to incorporate related information about users and objects. Finally, we show that certain multi-task learning methods can be also seen as special cases of our proposed approach.
Discriminative, Generative and Imitative Learning
, 2002
"... I propose a common framework that combines three different paradigms in machine learning: generative, discriminative and imitative learning. A generative probabilistic distribution is a principled way to model many machine learning and machine perception problems. Therein, one provides domain specif ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
I propose a common framework that combines three different paradigms in machine learning: generative, discriminative and imitative learning. A generative probabilistic distribution is a principled way to model many machine learning and machine perception problems. Therein, one provides domain specific knowledge in terms of structure and parameter priors over the joint space of variables. Bayesian networks and Bayesian statistics provide a rich and flexible language for specifying this knowledge and subsequently refining it with data and observations. The final result is a distribution that is a good generator of novel exemplars.
Logical Bayesian Networks and their relation to other probabilistic logical models
- In Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Inductive Logic Pogramming (ILP-05), volume 3625 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence
, 2005
"... We review Logical Bayesian Networks, a language for probabilistic logical modelling, and discuss its relation to Probabilistic Relational Models and Bayesian Logic Programs. 1 Probabilistic Logical Models Probabilistic logical models are models combining aspects of probability theory with aspects of ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 20 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We review Logical Bayesian Networks, a language for probabilistic logical modelling, and discuss its relation to Probabilistic Relational Models and Bayesian Logic Programs. 1 Probabilistic Logical Models Probabilistic logical models are models combining aspects of probability theory with aspects of Logic Programming, first-order logic or relational languages. Recently a variety of languages to describe such models has been introduced. For some languages techniques exist to learn such models from data. Two examples are Probabilistic Relational Models (PRMs) [4] and Bayesian Logic Programs (BLPs) [5]. These two languages are probably the most popular and well-known in the Relational Data Mining community. We introduce a new language, Logical Bayesian Networks (LBNs) [2], that is strongly related to PRMs and BLPs yet solves some of their problems with respect to knowledge representation (related to expressiveness and intuitiveness). PRMs, BLPs and LBNs all follow the principle of Knowledge Based Model Construction: they offer a language that can be used to specify general probabilistic logical knowledge and they provide a methodology to construct a propositional model based on this knowledge when given a specific
Collaborative ensemble learning: Combining collaborative and content-based information filtering via hierarchical bayes
- In Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
, 2003
"... Collaborative filtering (CF) and contentbased filtering (CBF) have widely been used in information filtering applications, both approaches having their individual strengths and weaknesses. This paper proposes a novel probabilistic framework to unify CF and CBF, named collaborative ensemble learning. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Collaborative filtering (CF) and contentbased filtering (CBF) have widely been used in information filtering applications, both approaches having their individual strengths and weaknesses. This paper proposes a novel probabilistic framework to unify CF and CBF, named collaborative ensemble learning. Based on content based probabilistic models for each user’s preferences (the CBF idea), it combines a society of users ’ preferences to predict an active user’s preferences (the CF idea). While retaining an intuitive explanation, the combination scheme can be interpreted as a hierarchical Bayesian approach in which a common prior distribution is learned from related experiments. It does not require a global training stage and thus can incrementally incorporate new data. We report results based on two data sets, the Reuters-21578 text data set and a data base of user opionions on art images. For both data sets, collaborative ensemble achieved excellent performance in terms of recommendation accuracy. In addition to recommendation engines, collaborative ensemble learning is applicable to problems typically solved via classical hierarchical Bayes, like multisensor fusion and multitask learning. 1
Probabilistic modeling of transaction data with applications to profiling, visualization, and prediction
- In KDD 2001
, 2001
"... Transaction data is ubiquitous in data mining applications. Examples include market basket data in retail commerce, telephone call records in telecommunications, and Web logs of individual page-requests at Web sites. Profiling consists of using historical transaction data on individuals to construct ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Transaction data is ubiquitous in data mining applications. Examples include market basket data in retail commerce, telephone call records in telecommunications, and Web logs of individual page-requests at Web sites. Profiling consists of using historical transaction data on individuals to construct a model of each individual’s behavior. Simple profiling techniques such as histograms do not generalize well from sparse transaction data. In this paper we investigate the application of probabilistic mixture models to automatically generate profiles from large volumes of transaction data. In effect, the mixture model represents each individual’s behavior as a linear combination of “basis transactions. ” We evaluate several variations of the model on a large retail transaction data set and show that the proposed model provides improved predictive power over simpler histogram-based techniques, as well as being relatively scalable, interpretable, and flexible. In addition we point to applications in outlier detection, customer ranking, interactive visualization, and so forth. The paper concludes by comparing and relating the proposed framework to other transaction-data modeling techniques such as association rules.
Recommender Systems Using Linear Classifiers
- Journal of Machine Learning Research
, 2002
"... Recommender systems use historical data on user preferences and other available data on users (for example, demographics) and items (for example, taxonomy) to predict items a new user might like. Applications of these methods include recommending items for purchase and personalizing the browsing ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Recommender systems use historical data on user preferences and other available data on users (for example, demographics) and items (for example, taxonomy) to predict items a new user might like. Applications of these methods include recommending items for purchase and personalizing the browsing experience on a web-site. Collaborative filtering methods have focused on using just the history of user preferences to make the recommendations.

