Results 1  10
of
11
Encoding information flow in Haskell
 In CSFW’06: the 19th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop
, 2006
"... This paper presents an embedded security sublanguage for enforcing informationflow policies in the standard Haskell programming language. The sublanguage provides useful informationflow control mechanisms including dynamic security lattices, runtime code privileges and declassification, without m ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper presents an embedded security sublanguage for enforcing informationflow policies in the standard Haskell programming language. The sublanguage provides useful informationflow control mechanisms including dynamic security lattices, runtime code privileges and declassification, without modifying the base language. This design avoids the redundant work of producing new languages, lowers the threshold for adopting securitytyped languages, and also provides great flexibility and modularity for using securitypolicy frameworks. The embedded security sublanguage is designed using a standard combinator interface called arrows. Computations constructed in the sublanguage have static and explicit controlflow components, making it possible to implement informationflow control using staticanalysis techniques at run time, while providing strong security guarantees. This paper presents a concrete Haskell implementation and an example application demonstrating the proposed techniques. 1.
The essence of dataflow programming
 In APLAS
, 2005
"... Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure contextdependent computation. In particular, we develop a generic comonadic interpreter of languages for contextdependent computation and instantiate it for streambased computation. We also discuss distributive laws of a comonad over a monad as a means to structure combinations of effectful and contextdependent computation. We apply the latter to analyse clocked dataflow (partial stream based) computation. 1
Arrows, like monads, are monoids
 Proc. of 22nd Ann. Conf. on Mathematical Foundations of Programming Semantics, MFPS XXII, v. 158 of Electron. Notes in Theoret. Comput. Sci
, 2006
"... Monads are by now wellestablished as programming construct in functional languages. Recently, the notion of “Arrow ” was introduced by Hughes as an extension, not with one, but with two type parameters. At first, these Arrows may look somewhat arbitrary. Here we show that they are categorically fai ..."
Abstract

Cited by 12 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Monads are by now wellestablished as programming construct in functional languages. Recently, the notion of “Arrow ” was introduced by Hughes as an extension, not with one, but with two type parameters. At first, these Arrows may look somewhat arbitrary. Here we show that they are categorically fairly civilised, by showing that they correspond to monoids in suitable subcategories of bifunctors C op ×C → C. This shows that, at a suitable level of abstraction, arrows are like monads — which are monoids in categories of functors C → C. Freyd categories have been introduced by Power and Robinson to model computational effects, well before Hughes ’ Arrows appeared. It is often claimed (informally) that Arrows are simply Freyd categories. We shall make this claim precise by showing how monoids in categories of bifunctors exactly correspond to Freyd categories.
There and back again: arrows for invertible programming
 In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Haskell
, 2006
"... Invertible programming occurs in the area of data conversion where it is required that the conversion in one direction is the inverse of the other. For that purpose, we introduce bidirectional arrows (biarrows). The biarrow class is an extension of Haskell’s arrow class with an extra combinator tha ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Invertible programming occurs in the area of data conversion where it is required that the conversion in one direction is the inverse of the other. For that purpose, we introduce bidirectional arrows (biarrows). The biarrow class is an extension of Haskell’s arrow class with an extra combinator that changes the direction of computation. The advantage of the use of biarrows for invertible programming is the preservation of invertibility properties using the biarrow combinators. Programming with biarrows in a polytypic or generic way exploits this the most. Besides bidirectional polytypic examples, including invertible serialization, we give the definition of a monadic biarrow transformer, which we use to construct a bidirectional parser/pretty printer.
Traced Premonoidal Categories
, 1999
"... Motivated by some examples from functional programming, we propose a generalization of the notion of trace to symmetric premonoidal categories and of Conway operators to Freyd categories. We show that in a Freyd category, these notions are equivalent, generalizing a wellknown theorem relating trace ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Motivated by some examples from functional programming, we propose a generalization of the notion of trace to symmetric premonoidal categories and of Conway operators to Freyd categories. We show that in a Freyd category, these notions are equivalent, generalizing a wellknown theorem relating traces and Conway operators in cartesian categories.
The essence of dataflow programming (short version
 Proc. of 3rd Asian Symp. on Programming Languages and Systems, APLAS 2005, v. 3780 of Lect. Notes in Comput. Sci
, 2005
"... Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We propose a novel, comonadic approach to dataflow (streambased) computation. This is based on the observation that both general and causal stream functions can be characterized as coKleisli arrows of comonads and on the intuition that comonads in general must be a good means to structure contextdependent computation. In particular, we develop a generic comonadic interpreter of languages for contextdependent computation and instantiate it for streambased computation. We also discuss distributive laws of a comonad over a monad as a means to structure combinations of effectful and contextdependent computation. We apply the latter to analyse clocked dataflow (partial stream based) computation. 1
Adapting Mathematical Domain
, 2010
"... Abstract. Mathematical learning environments help students in mastering mathematical knowledge. Mature environments typically offer thousands of interactive exercises. Providing feedback to students solving interactive exercises requires domain reasoners for doing the exercisespecific calculations. ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Mathematical learning environments help students in mastering mathematical knowledge. Mature environments typically offer thousands of interactive exercises. Providing feedback to students solving interactive exercises requires domain reasoners for doing the exercisespecific calculations. Since a domain reasoner has to solve an exercise in the same way a student should solve it, the structure of domain reasoners should follow the layered structure of the mathematical domains. Furthermore, learners, teachers, and environment builders have different requirements for adapting domain reasoners, such as providing more details, disallowing or enforcing certain solutions, and combining multiple mathematical domains in a new domain. In previous work we have shown how domain reasoners for solving interactive exercises can be expressed in terms of rewrite strategies, rewrite rules, and views. This paper shows how users can adapt and configure such domain reasoners to their own needs. This is achieved by enabling users to explicitly communicate the components that are used for solving an exercise. 1
Assistants
, 2009
"... Abstract. Interactive exercise assistants support students in practicing exercises, and acquiring procedural skills. Many mathematical topics can be practiced in such assistants. Ideally, an interactive exercise assistant not only validates final answers, but also comments on intermediate steps subm ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Interactive exercise assistants support students in practicing exercises, and acquiring procedural skills. Many mathematical topics can be practiced in such assistants. Ideally, an interactive exercise assistant not only validates final answers, but also comments on intermediate steps submitted by a student, provides hints on how to proceed, and presents workedout examples. For these purposes, fine control over the symbolic simplification procedures of the underlying mathematical machinery is needed. In this paper, we introduce views for mathematical expressions. A view defines an equivalence relation by choosing a canonical form of mathematical expressions. We use views to track and recognize intermediate answers, to help in presenting expressions to a user, and to control the granularity of the steps in workedout examples. We develop the concept of a view, discuss the laws it satisfies, and show how views are composed, which means that they can be used for multiple exercise classes. 1