Results 1 - 10
of
27
Coupled Semi-Supervised Learning for Information Extraction
"... We consider the problem of semi-supervised learning to extract categories (e.g., academic fields, athletes) and relations (e.g., PlaysSport(athlete, sport)) from web pages, starting with a handful of labeled training examples of each category or relation, plus hundreds of millions of unlabeled web d ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 50 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of semi-supervised learning to extract categories (e.g., academic fields, athletes) and relations (e.g., PlaysSport(athlete, sport)) from web pages, starting with a handful of labeled training examples of each category or relation, plus hundreds of millions of unlabeled web documents. Semi-supervised training using only a few labeled examples is typically unreliable because the learning task is underconstrained. This paper pursues the thesis that much greater accuracy can be achieved by further constraining the learning task, by coupling the semi-supervised training of many extractors for different categories and relations. We characterize several ways in which the training of category and relation extractors can be coupled, and present experimental results demonstrating significantly improved accuracy as a result. Categories and Subject Descriptors I.2.6 [Artificial Intelligence]: Learning—knowledge acquisition;
Learning from labeled features using generalized expectation criteria
- In SIGIR
, 2008
"... It is difficult to apply machine learning to new domains because often we lack labeled problem instances. In this paper, we provide a solution to this problem that leverages domain knowledge in the form of affinities between input features and classes. For example, in a baseball vs. hockey text clas ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 40 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
It is difficult to apply machine learning to new domains because often we lack labeled problem instances. In this paper, we provide a solution to this problem that leverages domain knowledge in the form of affinities between input features and classes. For example, in a baseball vs. hockey text classification problem, even without any labeled data, we know that the presence of the word puck is a strong indicator of hockey. We refer to this type of domain knowledge as a labeled feature. In this paper, we propose a method for training discriminative probabilistic models with labeled features and unlabeled instances. Unlike previous approaches that use labeled features to create labeled pseudo-instances, we use labeled features directly to constrain the model’s predictions on unlabeled instances. We express these soft constraints using generalized expectation (GE) criteria — terms in a parameter estimation objective function that express preferences on values of a model expectation. In this paper we train multinomial logistic regression models using GE criteria, but the method we develop is applicable to other discriminative probabilistic models. The complete objective function also includes a Gaussian prior on parameters, which encourages generalization by spreading parameter weight to unlabeled features. Experimental results on text classification data sets show that this method outperforms heuristic approaches to training classifiers with labeled features. Experiments with human annotators show that it is more beneficial to spend limited annotation time labeling features rather than labeling instances. For example, after only one minute of labeling features, we can achieve 80 % accuracy on the ibm vs. mac text classification problem using GE-FL, whereas ten minutes labeling documents results in an accuracy of only 77%
Posterior Regularization for Structured Latent Variable Models
"... We present posterior regularization, a probabilistic framework for structured, weakly supervised learning. Our framework efficiently incorporates indirect supervision via constraints on posterior distributions of probabilistic models with latent variables. Posterior regularization separates model co ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 39 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present posterior regularization, a probabilistic framework for structured, weakly supervised learning. Our framework efficiently incorporates indirect supervision via constraints on posterior distributions of probabilistic models with latent variables. Posterior regularization separates model complexity from the complexity of structural constraints it is desired to satisfy. By directly imposing decomposable regularization on the posterior moments of latent variables during learning, we retain the computational efficiency of the unconstrained model while ensuring desired constraints hold in expectation. We present an efficient algorithm for learning with posterior regularization and illustrate its versatility on a diverse set of structural constraints such as bijectivity, symmetry and group sparsity in several large scale experiments, including multi-view learning, cross-lingual dependency grammar induction, unsupervised part-of-speech induction, and bitext word alignment. 1
Toward an architecture for never-ending language learning
- In AAAI
, 2010
"... We consider here the problem of building a never-ending language learner; that is, an intelligent computer agent that runs forever and that each day must (1) extract, or read, information from the web to populate a growing structured knowledge base, and (2) learn to perform this task better than on ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 36 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We consider here the problem of building a never-ending language learner; that is, an intelligent computer agent that runs forever and that each day must (1) extract, or read, information from the web to populate a growing structured knowledge base, and (2) learn to perform this task better than on the previous day. In particular, we propose an approach and a set of design principles for such an agent, describe a partial implementation of such a system that has already learned to extract a knowledge base containing over 242,000 beliefs with an estimated precision of 74 % after running for 67 days, and discuss lessons learned from this preliminary attempt to build a never-ending learning agent.
Generalized expectation criteria for semi-supervised learning of conditional random fields
- In In Proc. ACL, pages 870 – 878
, 2008
"... This paper presents a semi-supervised training method for linear-chain conditional random fields that makes use of labeled features rather than labeled instances. This is accomplished by using generalized expectation criteria to express a preference for parameter settings in which the model’s distri ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 35 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a semi-supervised training method for linear-chain conditional random fields that makes use of labeled features rather than labeled instances. This is accomplished by using generalized expectation criteria to express a preference for parameter settings in which the model’s distribution on unlabeled data matches a target distribution. We induce target conditional probability distributions of labels given features from both annotated feature occurrences in context and adhoc feature majority label assignment. The use of generalized expectation criteria allows for a dramatic reduction in annotation time by shifting from traditional instance-labeling to feature-labeling, and the methods presented outperform traditional CRF training and other semi-supervised methods when limited human effort is available. 1
Learning From Measurements in Exponential Families
"... Given a model family and a set of unlabeled examples, one could either label specific examples or state general constraints—both provide information about the desired model. In general, what is the most cost-effective way to learn? To address this question, we introduce measurements, a general class ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 20 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Given a model family and a set of unlabeled examples, one could either label specific examples or state general constraints—both provide information about the desired model. In general, what is the most cost-effective way to learn? To address this question, we introduce measurements, a general class of mechanisms for providing information about a target model. We present a Bayesian decision-theoretic framework, which allows us to both integrate diverse measurements and choose new measurements to make. We use a variational inference algorithm, which exploits exponential family duality. The merits of our approach are demonstrated on two sequence labeling tasks. 1.
Active learning by labeling features
- In Proc. of EMNLP
, 2009
"... Methods that learn from prior information about input features such as generalized expectation (GE) have been used to train accurate models with very little effort. In this paper, we propose an active learning approach in which the machine solicits “labels ” on features rather than instances. In bot ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 15 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Methods that learn from prior information about input features such as generalized expectation (GE) have been used to train accurate models with very little effort. In this paper, we propose an active learning approach in which the machine solicits “labels ” on features rather than instances. In both simulated and real user experiments on two sequence labeling tasks we show that our active learning method outperforms passive learning with features as well as traditional active learning with instances. Preliminary experiments suggest that novel interfaces which intelligently solicit labels on multiple features facilitate more efficient annotation. 1
Alternating projections for learning with expectation constraints
- In Proc. UAI
, 2009
"... We present an objective function for learning with unlabeled data that utilizes auxiliary expectation constraints. We optimize this objective function using a procedure that alternates between information and moment projections. Our method provides an alternate interpretation of the posterior regula ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 10 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We present an objective function for learning with unlabeled data that utilizes auxiliary expectation constraints. We optimize this objective function using a procedure that alternates between information and moment projections. Our method provides an alternate interpretation of the posterior regularization framework (Graca et al., 2008), maintains uncertainty during optimization unlike constraint-driven learning (Chang et al., 2007), and is more efficient than generalized expectation criteria (Mann & McCallum, 2008). Applications of this framework include minimally supervised learning, semisupervised learning, and learning with constraints that are more expressive than the underlying model. In experiments, we demonstrate comparable accuracy to generalized expectation criteria for minimally supervised learning, and use expressive structural constraints to guide semi-supervised learning, providing a 3%-6 % improvement over stateof-the-art constraint-driven learning. 1
Confidence driven unsupervised semantic parsing
- In Proc. of the Meeting of Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL
, 2011
"... Current approaches for semantic parsing take a supervised approach requiring a considerable amount of training data which is expensive and difficult to obtain. This supervision bottleneck is one of the major difficulties in scaling up semantic parsing. We argue that a semantic parser can be trained ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 7 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Current approaches for semantic parsing take a supervised approach requiring a considerable amount of training data which is expensive and difficult to obtain. This supervision bottleneck is one of the major difficulties in scaling up semantic parsing. We argue that a semantic parser can be trained effectively without annotated data, and introduce an unsupervised learning algorithm. The algorithm takes a self training approach driven by confidence estimation. Evaluated over Geoquery, a standard dataset for this task, our system achieved 66 % accuracy, compared to 80 % of its fully supervised counterpart, demonstrating the promise of unsupervised approaches for this task. 1
Punctuation: Making a Point in Unsupervised Dependency Parsing
"... We show how punctuation can be used to improve unsupervised dependency parsing. Our linguistic analysis confirms the strong connection between English punctuation and phrase boundaries in the Penn Treebank. However, approaches that naively include punctuation marks in the grammar (as if they were wo ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 5 (4 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We show how punctuation can be used to improve unsupervised dependency parsing. Our linguistic analysis confirms the strong connection between English punctuation and phrase boundaries in the Penn Treebank. However, approaches that naively include punctuation marks in the grammar (as if they were words) do not perform well with Klein and Manning’s Dependency Model with Valence (DMV). Instead, we split a sentence at punctuation and impose parsing restrictions over its fragments. Our grammar inducer is trained on the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) and achieves 59.5 % accuracy out-of-domain (Brown sentences with 100 or fewer words), more than 6 % higher than the previous best results. Further evaluation, using the 2006/7 CoNLL sets, reveals that punctuation aids grammar induction in 17 of 18 languages, for an overall average net gain of 1.3%. Some of this improvement is from training, but more than half is from parsing with induced constraints, in inference. Punctuation-aware decoding works with existing (even already-trained) parsing models and always increased accuracy in our experiments. 1

