Results 1  10
of
11
LinearTime PointerMachine Algorithms for Least Common Ancestors, MST Verification, and Dominators
 IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING
, 1998
"... We present two new data structure toolsdisjoint set union with bottomup linking, and pointerbased radix sortand combine them with bottomlevel microtrees to devise the first lineartime pointermachine algorithms for offline least common ancestors, minimum spanning tree (MST) verification, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 27 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present two new data structure toolsdisjoint set union with bottomup linking, and pointerbased radix sortand combine them with bottomlevel microtrees to devise the first lineartime pointermachine algorithms for offline least common ancestors, minimum spanning tree (MST) verification, randomized MST construction, and computing dominators in a flowgraph.
Optimal Purely Functional Priority Queues
 JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL PROGRAMMING
, 1996
"... Brodal recently introduced the first implementation of imperative priority queues to support findMin, insert, and meld in O(1) worstcase time, and deleteMin in O(log n) worstcase time. These bounds are asymptotically optimal among all comparisonbased priority queues. In this paper, we adapt B ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Brodal recently introduced the first implementation of imperative priority queues to support findMin, insert, and meld in O(1) worstcase time, and deleteMin in O(log n) worstcase time. These bounds are asymptotically optimal among all comparisonbased priority queues. In this paper, we adapt Brodal's data structure to a purely functional setting. In doing so, we both simplify the data structure and clarify its relationship to the binomial queues of Vuillemin, which support all four operations in O(log n) time. Specifically, we derive our implementation from binomial queues in three steps: first, we reduce the running time of insert to O(1) by eliminating the possibility of cascading links; second, we reduce the running time of findMin to O(1) by adding a global root to hold the minimum element; and finally, we reduce the running time of meld to O(1) by allowing priority queues to contain other priority queues. Each of these steps is expressed using MLstyle functors. The last transformation, known as datastructural bootstrapping, is an interesting application of higherorder functors and recursive structures.
Purely Functional Representations of Catenable Sorted Lists.
 In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing
, 1996
"... The power of purely functional programming in the construction of data structures has received much attention, not only because functional languages have many desirable properties, but because structures built purely functionally are automatically fully persistent: any and all versions of a structur ..."
Abstract

Cited by 16 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The power of purely functional programming in the construction of data structures has received much attention, not only because functional languages have many desirable properties, but because structures built purely functionally are automatically fully persistent: any and all versions of a structure can coexist indefinitely. Recent results illustrate the surprising power of pure functionality. One such result was the development of a representation of doubleended queues with catenation that supports all operations, including catenation, in worstcase constant time [19].
Confluently Persistent Deques via DataStructural Bootstrapping
 J. of Algorithms
, 1993
"... We introduce datastructural bootstrapping, a technique to design data structures recursively, and use it to design confluently persistent deques. Our data structure requires O(log 3 k) worstcase time and space per deletion, where k is the total number of deque operations, and constant worstcase t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce datastructural bootstrapping, a technique to design data structures recursively, and use it to design confluently persistent deques. Our data structure requires O(log 3 k) worstcase time and space per deletion, where k is the total number of deque operations, and constant worstcase time and space for other operations. Further, the data structure allows a purely functional implementation, with no side effects. This improves a previous result of Driscoll, Sleator, and Tarjan. 1 An extended abstract of this paper was presented at the 4th ACMSIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 1993. 2 Supported by a Fannie and John Hertz Foundation fellowship, National Science Foundation Grant No. CCR8920505, and the Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science (DIMACS) under NSFSTC8809648. 3 Also affiliated with NEC Research Institute, 4 Independence Way, Princeton, NJ 08540. Research at Princeton University partially supported by the National Science Foundatio...
Splay trees, DavenportSchinzel sequences, and the deque conjecture
, 2007
"... We introduce a new technique to bound the asymptotic performance of splay trees. The basic idea is to transcribe, in an indirect fashion, the rotations performed by the splay tree as a DavenportSchinzel sequence S, none of whose subsequences are isomorphic to fixed forbidden subsequence. We direct ..."
Abstract

Cited by 15 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We introduce a new technique to bound the asymptotic performance of splay trees. The basic idea is to transcribe, in an indirect fashion, the rotations performed by the splay tree as a DavenportSchinzel sequence S, none of whose subsequences are isomorphic to fixed forbidden subsequence. We direct this technique towards Tarjan’s deque conjecture and prove that n deque operations require O(nα ∗ (n)) time, where α ∗ (n) is the minimum number of applications of the inverseAckermann function mapping n to a constant. We are optimistic that this approach could be directed towards other open conjectures on splay trees such as the traversal and split conjectures.
A New, Simpler LinearTime Dominators Algorithm
 ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
, 1998
"... this article is organized as follows. Section 2 outlines Lengauer and Tarjan's approach. Section 3 gives a broad overview of our algorithm and dierentiates it from previous work. Section 4 presents our algorithm in detail, and Section 5 analyzes its running time. Section 6 presents our new pathcomp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 14 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this article is organized as follows. Section 2 outlines Lengauer and Tarjan's approach. Section 3 gives a broad overview of our algorithm and dierentiates it from previous work. Section 4 presents our algorithm in detail, and Section 5 analyzes its running time. Section 6 presents our new pathcompression result, on which the analysis relies. Section 7 describes our implementation, and Section 8 reports experimental results. We conclude in Section 9
Purely Functional, RealTime Deques with Catenation
 Journal of the ACM
, 1999
"... We describe an efficient, purely functional implementation of deques with catenation. In addition to being an intriguing problem in its own right, finding a purely functional implementation of catenable deques is required to add certain sophisticated programming constructs to functional programming ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe an efficient, purely functional implementation of deques with catenation. In addition to being an intriguing problem in its own right, finding a purely functional implementation of catenable deques is required to add certain sophisticated programming constructs to functional programming languages. Our solution has a worstcase running time of O(1) for each push, pop, inject, eject and catenation. The best previously known solution has an O(log k) time bound for the k deque operation. Our solution is not only faster but simpler. A key idea used in our result is an algorithmic technique related to the redundant digital representations used to avoid carry propagation in binary counting.
Simple Confluently Persistent Catenable Lists
 SIAM JOURNAL ON COMPUTING
, 1998
"... We consider the problem of maintaining persistent lists subject to concatenation and to insertions and deletions at both ends. Updates to a persistent data structure are nondestructive  each operation produces a new list incorporating the change, while keeping intact the list or lists to which it a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider the problem of maintaining persistent lists subject to concatenation and to insertions and deletions at both ends. Updates to a persistent data structure are nondestructive  each operation produces a new list incorporating the change, while keeping intact the list or lists to which it applies. Although general techniques exist for making data structures persistent, these techniques fail for structures that are subject to operations, such as catenation, that combine two or more versions. In this paper we develop a simple implementation of persistent doubleended queues with catenation that supports all deque operations in constant amortized time. Our implementation is functional if we allow memoization.
Applications of forbidden 01 matrices to search tree and path compression based data structures
, 2009
"... In this paper we improve, reprove, and simplify a variety of theorems concerning the performance of data structures based on path compression and search trees. We apply a technique very familiar to computational geometers but still foreign to many researchers in (nongeometric) algorithms and data s ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we improve, reprove, and simplify a variety of theorems concerning the performance of data structures based on path compression and search trees. We apply a technique very familiar to computational geometers but still foreign to many researchers in (nongeometric) algorithms and data structures, namely, to bound the complexity of an object via its forbidden substructures. To analyze an algorithm or data structure in the forbidden substructure framework one proceeds in three discrete steps. First, one transcribes the behavior of the algorithm as some combinatorial object M; for example, M may be a graph, sequence, permutation, matrix, set system, or tree. (The size of M should ideally be linear in the running time.) Second, one shows that M excludes some forbidden substructure P, and third, one bounds the size of any object avoiding this substructure. The power of this framework derives from the fact that M lies in a more pristine environment and that upper bounds on the size of a Pfree object M may be reused in different contexts. All of our proofs begin by transcribing the individual operations of a dynamic data structure
Compact Data Structures with Fast Queries
, 2005
"... Many applications dealing with large data structures can benefit from keeping them in compressed form. Compression has many benefits: it can allow a representation to fit in main memory rather than swapping out to disk, and it improves cache performance since it allows more data to fit into the c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Many applications dealing with large data structures can benefit from keeping them in compressed form. Compression has many benefits: it can allow a representation to fit in main memory rather than swapping out to disk, and it improves cache performance since it allows more data to fit into the cache. However, a data structure is only useful if it allows the application to perform fast queries (and updates) to the data.