Abstract not found

Abstract—This paper focuses on the way to achieve accurate visual servoing tasks when the shape of the object being observed as well as the desired image are unknown. More precisely, we want to control the camera orientation with respect to the tangent plane at a certain object point corresponding to the center of a region of interest. We also want to observe this point at the principal point to fulfil a fixation task. A 3-D reconstruction phase must, therefore, be performed during the camera motion. Our approach is then close to the structure-from-motion problem. The reconstruction phase is based on the measurement of the 2-D motion in a region of interest and on the measurement of the camera velocity. Since the 2-D motion depends on the shape of the objects being observed, we introduce a unified motion model to cope both with planar and nonplanar objects. However, since this model is only an approximation, we propose two approaches to enlarge its domain of validity. The first is based on active vision, coupled with a 3-D reconstruction based on a continuous approach, and the second is based on statistical techniques of robust estimation, coupled with a 3-D reconstruction based on a discrete approach. Theoretical and experimental results compare both approaches. Index Terms—Active vision, 3-D reconstruction, dynamic vision, M-estimators, robust estimation, structure-from-motion,

Abstract — Time to Contact (TTC) is a biologically inspired method for obstacle detection and reactive control of motion that does not require scene reconstruction or 3D depth estimation. Estimating TTC is difficult because it requires a stable and reliable estimate of the rate of change of distance between image features. In this paper we propose a new method to measure time to contact, Active Contour Affine Scale (ACAS). We experimentally and analytically compare ACAS with two other recently proposed methods: Scale Invariant Ridge Segments (SIRS), and Image Brightness Derivatives (IBD). Our results show that ACAS provides a more accurate estimation of TTC when the image flow may be approximated by an affine transformation, while SIRS provides an estimate that is generally valid, but may not always be as accurate as ACAS, and IBD systematically over-estimate time to contact. I.