Results 1  10
of
13
Guaranteed proofs using interval arithmetic
 Proceedings of the 17th Symposium on Computer Arithmetic, Cape Cod
, 2005
"... This paper presents a set of tools for mechanical reasoning of numerical bounds using interval arithmetic. The tools implement two techniques for reducing decorrelation: interval splitting and Taylor’s series expansions. Although the tools are designed for the proof assistant system PVS, expertise o ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper presents a set of tools for mechanical reasoning of numerical bounds using interval arithmetic. The tools implement two techniques for reducing decorrelation: interval splitting and Taylor’s series expansions. Although the tools are designed for the proof assistant system PVS, expertise on PVS is not required. The ultimate goal of the tools is to provide guaranteed proofs of numerical properties with a minimal humantheorem prover interaction. 1
A proven correctly rounded logarithm in doubleprecision
 In Real Numbers and Computers, Schloss Dagstuhl
, 2004
"... Abstract. This article is a case study in the implementation of a portable, proven and efficient correctly rounded elementary function in doubleprecision. We describe the methodology used to achieve these goals in the crlibm library. There are two novel aspects to this approach. The first is the pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This article is a case study in the implementation of a portable, proven and efficient correctly rounded elementary function in doubleprecision. We describe the methodology used to achieve these goals in the crlibm library. There are two novel aspects to this approach. The first is the proof framework, and in general the techniques used to balance performance and provability. The second is the introduction of processorspecific optimization to get performance equivalent to the best current mathematical libraries, while trying to minimize the proof work. The implementation of the natural logarithm is detailed to illustrate these questions. Mathematics Subject Classification. 2604, 65D15, 65Y99. 1.
Assisted verification of elementary functions using Gappa
 In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing
, 2006
"... The implementation of a correctly rounded or interval elementary function needs to be proven carefully in the very last details. The proof requires a tight bound on the overall error of the implementation with respect to the mathematical function. Such work is function specific, concerns tens of lin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 17 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The implementation of a correctly rounded or interval elementary function needs to be proven carefully in the very last details. The proof requires a tight bound on the overall error of the implementation with respect to the mathematical function. Such work is function specific, concerns tens of lines of code for each function, and will usually be broken by the smallest change to the code (e.g. for maintenance or optimization purpose). Therefore, it is very tedious and errorprone if done by hand. This article discusses the use of the Gappa proof assistant in this context. Gappa has two main advantages over previous approaches: Its input format is very close to the actual C code to validate, and it automates error evaluation and propagation using interval arithmetic. Besides, it can be used to incrementally prove complex mathematical properties pertaining to the C code. Yet it does not require any specific knowledge about automatic theorem proving, and thus is accessible to a wider community. Moreover, Gappa may generate a formal proof of the results that can be checked independently by a lowerlevel proof assistant like Coq, hence providing an even higher confidence in the certification of the numerical code. 1.
Real number calculations and theorem proving
 Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, TPHOLs 2005, volume 3603 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science
, 2005
"... Abstract. Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to conveniently use ordinary real number expressions within proof assistants? In this paper we outline how this can be done within a theorem proving framework. First, we formally establish upper and lower bounds for trigonometric and transcendental functions. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to conveniently use ordinary real number expressions within proof assistants? In this paper we outline how this can be done within a theorem proving framework. First, we formally establish upper and lower bounds for trigonometric and transcendental functions. Then, based on these bounds, we develop a rational interval arithmetic where real number calculations can be performed in an algebraic setting. This pragmatic approach has been implemented as a strategy in PVS. The strategy provides a safe way to perform explicit calculations over real numbers in formal proofs. 1
FORMALLY CERTIFIED FLOATINGPOINT FILTERS FOR HOMOGENEOUS GEOMETRIC PREDICATES
 THEORETICAL INFORMATICS AND APPLICATIONS
, 2007
"... Floatingpoint arithmetic provides a fast but inexact way of computing geometric predicates. In order for these predicates to be exact, it is important to rule out all the numerical situations where floatingpoint computations could lead to wrong results. Taking into account all the potential proble ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Floatingpoint arithmetic provides a fast but inexact way of computing geometric predicates. In order for these predicates to be exact, it is important to rule out all the numerical situations where floatingpoint computations could lead to wrong results. Taking into account all the potential problems is a tedious work to do by hand. We study in this paper a floatingpoint implementation of a filter for the orientation2 predicate, and how a formal and partially automatized verification of this algorithm avoided many pitfalls. The presented method is not limited to this particular predicate, it can easily be used to produce correct semistatic floatingpoint filters for other geometric predicates.
Certifying the floatingpoint implementation of an elementary function using Gappa
 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2010. 9 HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1145/1772954.1772987 10 HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1145/1838599.1838622 11 HTTP://SHEMESH.LARC.NASA.GOV/NFM2010/PAPERS/NFM2010_14_23.PDF 12 HTTP://DX.DOI.ORG/10.1007/9783642142031_11 13 HTTP://DX.
, 2011
"... High confidence in floatingpoint programs requires proving numerical properties of final and intermediate values. One may need to guarantee that a value stays within some range, or that the error relative to some ideal value is well bounded. This certification may require a timeconsuming proof fo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
High confidence in floatingpoint programs requires proving numerical properties of final and intermediate values. One may need to guarantee that a value stays within some range, or that the error relative to some ideal value is well bounded. This certification may require a timeconsuming proof for each line of code, and it is usually broken by the smallest change to the code, e.g., for maintenance or optimization purpose. Certifying floatingpoint programs by hand is, therefore, very tedious and errorprone. The Gappa proof assistant is designed to make this task both easier and more secure, due to the following novel features: It automates the evaluation and propagation of rounding errors using interval arithmetic. Its input format is very close to the actual code to validate. It can be used incrementally to prove complex mathematical properties pertaining to the code. It generates a formal proof of the results, which can be checked independently by a lower level proof assistant like Coq. Yet it does not require any specific knowledge about automatic theorem proving, and thus, is accessible to a wide community. This paper demonstrates the practical use of this tool for a widely used class of floatingpoint programs: implementations of elementary functions in a mathematical library.
Formal certification of arithmetic filters for geometric predicates
"... Floatingpoint arithmetic provides a fast but inexact way of computing geometric predicates. In order for these predicates to be exact, it is important to rule out all the numerical situations where floatingpoint computations could lead to wrong results. Taking into account all the potential prob ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Floatingpoint arithmetic provides a fast but inexact way of computing geometric predicates. In order for these predicates to be exact, it is important to rule out all the numerical situations where floatingpoint computations could lead to wrong results. Taking into account all the potential problems is a tedious work to do by hand. We study in this paper a floatingpoint implementation of a filter for the orientation2 predicate, and how a formal and partially automatized verification of this algorithm avoided many pitfalls. The presented method is not limited to this particular predicate, it can easily be used to produce correct semistatic floatingpoint filters for other geometric predicates.
Verified Real Number Calculations: A Library for Interval Arithmetic
, 2007
"... Real number calculations on elementary functions are remarkably difficult to handle in mechanical proofs. In this paper, we show how these calculations can be performed within a theorem prover or proof assistant in a convenient and highly automated as well as interactive way. First, we formally est ..."
Abstract

Cited by 6 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Real number calculations on elementary functions are remarkably difficult to handle in mechanical proofs. In this paper, we show how these calculations can be performed within a theorem prover or proof assistant in a convenient and highly automated as well as interactive way. First, we formally establish upper and lower bounds for elementary functions. Then, based on these bounds, we develop a rational interval arithmetic where real number calculations take place in an algebraic setting. In order to reduce the dependency effect of interval arithmetic, we integrate two techniques: interval splitting and taylor series expansions. This pragmatic approach has been developed, and formally verified, in a theorem prover. The formal development also includes a set of customizable strategies to automate proofs involving explicit calculations over real numbers. Our ultimate goal is to provide guaranteed proofs of numerical properties with minimal human theoremprover interaction.
Assisted verification of elementary functions
, 2005
"... The implementation of a correctly rounded or interval elementary function needs to be proven carefully in the very last details. The proof requires a tight bound on the overall error of the implementation with respect to the mathematical function. Such work is function specific, concerns tens of lin ..."
Abstract

Cited by 5 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The implementation of a correctly rounded or interval elementary function needs to be proven carefully in the very last details. The proof requires a tight bound on the overall error of the implementation with respect to the mathematical function. Such work is function specific, concerns tens of lines of code for each function, and will usually be broken by the smallest change to the code (e.g. for maintenance or optimization purpose). Therefore, it is very tedious and errorprone if done by hand. This article discusses the use of the Gappa proof assistant in this context. Gappa has two main advantages over previous approaches: Its input format is very close to the actual C code to validate, and it automates error evaluation and propagation using interval arithmetic. Besides, it can be used to incrementally prove complex mathematical properties pertaining to the C code. Yet it does not require any specific knowledge about automatic theorem proving, and thus is accessible to a wider community. Moreover, Gappa may generate a formal proof of the results that can be checked independently by a lowerlevel proof assistant like Coq, hence providing an even higher confidence in the certification of the numerical code.