Results 1  10
of
77
PublicKey Cryptosystems Resilient to Key Leakage
"... Most of the work in the analysis of cryptographic schemes is concentrated in abstract adversarial models that do not capture sidechannel attacks. Such attacks exploit various forms of unintended information leakage, which is inherent to almost all physical implementations. Inspired by recent sidec ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Most of the work in the analysis of cryptographic schemes is concentrated in abstract adversarial models that do not capture sidechannel attacks. Such attacks exploit various forms of unintended information leakage, which is inherent to almost all physical implementations. Inspired by recent sidechannel attacks, especially the “cold boot attacks ” of Halderman et al. (USENIX Security ’08), Akavia, Goldwasser and Vaikuntanathan (TCC ’09) formalized a realistic framework for modeling the security of encryption schemes against a wide class of sidechannel attacks in which adversarially chosen functions of the secret key are leaked. In the setting of publickey encryption, Akavia et al. showed that Regev’s latticebased scheme (STOC ’05) is resilient to any leakage of
A leakageresilient mode of operation
 In EUROCRYPT
, 2009
"... Abstract. A weak pseudorandom function (wPRF) is a pseudorandom functions with a relaxed security requirement, where one only requires the output to be pseudorandom when queried on random (and not adversarially chosen) inputs. We show that unlike standard PRFs, wPRFs are secure against memory attack ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A weak pseudorandom function (wPRF) is a pseudorandom functions with a relaxed security requirement, where one only requires the output to be pseudorandom when queried on random (and not adversarially chosen) inputs. We show that unlike standard PRFs, wPRFs are secure against memory attacks, that is they remain secure even if a bounded amount of information about the secret key is leaked to the adversary. As an application of this result we propose a simple mode of operation which – when instantiated with any wPRF – gives a leakageresilient streamcipher. Such a cipher is secure against any sidechannel attack, as long as the amount of information leaked per round is bounded, but overall can be arbitrary large. This construction is simpler than the only previous one (DziembowskiPietrzak FOCS’08) as it only uses a single primitive (a wPRF) in a straight forward manner. 1
Appendonly signatures
 in International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
, 2005
"... Abstract. The strongest standard security notion for digital signature schemes is unforgeability under chosen message attacks. In practice, however, this notion can be insufficient due to “sidechannel attacks ” which exploit leakage of information about the secret internal state. In this work we pu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The strongest standard security notion for digital signature schemes is unforgeability under chosen message attacks. In practice, however, this notion can be insufficient due to “sidechannel attacks ” which exploit leakage of information about the secret internal state. In this work we put forward the notion of “leakageresilient signatures, ” which strengthens the standard security notion by giving the adversary the additional power to learn a bounded amount of arbitrary information about the secret state that was accessed during every signature generation. This notion naturally implies security against all sidechannel attacks as long as the amount of information leaked on each invocation is bounded and “only computation leaks information.” The main result of this paper is a construction which gives a (treebased, stateful) leakageresilient signature scheme based on any 3time signature scheme. The amount of information that our scheme can safely leak per signature generation is 1/3 of the information the underlying 3time signature scheme can leak in total. Signature schemes that remain secure even if a bounded total amount of information is leaked were recently constructed, hence instantiating our construction with these schemes gives the first constructions of provably secure leakageresilient signature schemes. The above construction assumes that the signing algorithm can sample truly random bits, and thus an implementation would need some special hardware (randomness gates). Simply generating this randomness using a leakageresilient streamcipher will in general not work. Our second contribution is a sound general principle to replace uniform random bits in any leakageresilient construction with pseudorandom ones: run two leakageresilient streamciphers (with independent keys) in parallel and then apply a twosource extractor to their outputs. 1
Separating succinct noninteractive arguments from all falsifiable assumptions
 In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’11
, 2011
"... An argument system (computationally sound proof) for N P is succinct, if its communication complexity is polylogarithmic the instance and witness sizes. The seminal works of Kilian ’92 and Micali ’94 show that such arguments can be constructed under standard cryptographic hardness assumptions with f ..."
Abstract

Cited by 35 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An argument system (computationally sound proof) for N P is succinct, if its communication complexity is polylogarithmic the instance and witness sizes. The seminal works of Kilian ’92 and Micali ’94 show that such arguments can be constructed under standard cryptographic hardness assumptions with four rounds of interaction, and that they be made noninteractive in the randomoracle model. The latter construction also gives us some evidence that succinct noninteractive arguments (SNARGs) may exist in the standard model with a common reference string (CRS), by replacing the oracle with a sufficiently complicated hash function whose description goes in the CRS. However, we currently do not know of any construction of SNARGs with a proof of security under any simple cryptographic assumption. In this work, we give a broad blackbox separation result, showing that blackbox reductions cannot be used to prove the security of any SNARG construction based on any falsifiable cryptographic assumption. This includes essentially all common assumptions used in cryptography (oneway functions, trapdoor permutations, DDH, RSA, LWE etc.). More generally, we say that an assumption is falsifiable if it can be modeled as an interactive game between an adversary and an efficient challenger that can efficiently decide if the adversary won the game. This is similar, in spirit, to the notion of falsifiability of Naor ’03, and captures the fact that we can efficiently check if an adversarial strategy breaks the assumption. Our separation result also extends to designated verifier SNARGs, where the verifier needs a trapdoor associated with the CRS to verify arguments, and slightly succinct SNARGs, whose size is only required to be sublinear in the statement and witness size.
From extractable collision resistance to succinct noninteractive arguments of knowledge, and back again
, 2011
"... The existence of succinct noninteractive arguments for NP (i.e., noninteractive computationallysound proofs where the verifier’s work is essentially independent of the complexity of the NP nondeterministic verifier) has been an intriguing question for the past two decades. Other than CS proofs in ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (12 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The existence of succinct noninteractive arguments for NP (i.e., noninteractive computationallysound proofs where the verifier’s work is essentially independent of the complexity of the NP nondeterministic verifier) has been an intriguing question for the past two decades. Other than CS proofs in the random oracle model [Micali, FOCS ’94], the only existing candidate construction is based on an elaborate assumption that is tailored to a specific protocol [Di Crescenzo and Lipmaa, CiE ’08]. We formulate a general and relatively natural notion of an extractable collisionresistant hash function (ECRH) and show that, if ECRHs exist, then a modified version of Di Crescenzo and Lipmaa’s protocol is a succinct noninteractive argument for NP. Furthermore, the modified protocol is actually a succinct noninteractive adaptive argument of knowledge (SNARK). We then propose several candidate constructions for ECRHs and relaxations thereof. We demonstrate the applicability of SNARKs to various forms of delegation of computation, to succinct noninteractive zero knowledge arguments, and to succinct twoparty secure computation. Finally, we show that SNARKs essentially imply the existence of ECRHs, thus demonstrating the necessity of
Signature schemes with bounded leakage resilience
 In ASIACRYPT
, 2009
"... A leakageresilient cryptosystem remains secure even if arbitrary, but bounded, information about the secret key (or possibly other internal state information) is leaked to an adversary. Denote the length of the secret key by n. We show a signature scheme tolerating (optimal) leakage of up to n − nǫ ..."
Abstract

Cited by 25 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A leakageresilient cryptosystem remains secure even if arbitrary, but bounded, information about the secret key (or possibly other internal state information) is leaked to an adversary. Denote the length of the secret key by n. We show a signature scheme tolerating (optimal) leakage of up to n − nǫ bits of information about the secret key, and a more efficient onetime signature scheme that tolerates leakage of ( 1 4 −ǫ) ·n bits of information about the signer’s entire state. The latter construction extends to give a leakageresilient ttime signature scheme. All these constructions are in the standard model under general assumptions. 1
On cryptography with auxiliary input
 DKL09] [DS05] [FGK+ 10] [FOR12] [GHV10
, 2009
"... We study the question of designing cryptographic schemes which are secure even if an arbitrary function f(sk) of the secret key is leaked, as long as the secret key sk is still (exponentially) hard to compute from this auxiliary input. This setting of auxiliary input is more general than the more tr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the question of designing cryptographic schemes which are secure even if an arbitrary function f(sk) of the secret key is leaked, as long as the secret key sk is still (exponentially) hard to compute from this auxiliary input. This setting of auxiliary input is more general than the more traditional setting, which assumes that some of information about the secret key sk may be leaked, but sk still has high minentropy left. In particular, we deal with situations where f(sk) informationtheoretically determines the entire secret key sk. As our main result, we construct CPA/CCA secure symmetric encryption schemes that remain secure with exponentially hardtoinvert auxiliary input. We give several applications of such schemes. • We construct an averagecase obfuscator for the class of point functions, which remains secure with exponentially hardtoinvert auxiliary input, and is reusable. • We construct a reusable and robust extractor that remains secure with exponentially hardtoinvert auxiliary input. Our results rely on a new cryptographic assumption, Learning SubspacewithNoise (LSN), which is related to the well known Learning ParitywithNoise (LPN) assumption.
Nonmalleable extractors and symmetric key cryptography from weak secrets
 In Proceedings of the 41stACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing
, 2009
"... We study the question of basing symmetric key cryptography on weak secrets. In this setting, Alice and Bob share an nbit secret W, which might not be uniformly random, but the adversary has at least k bits of uncertainty about it (formalized using conditional minentropy). Since standard symmetrick ..."
Abstract

Cited by 18 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study the question of basing symmetric key cryptography on weak secrets. In this setting, Alice and Bob share an nbit secret W, which might not be uniformly random, but the adversary has at least k bits of uncertainty about it (formalized using conditional minentropy). Since standard symmetrickey primitives require uniformly random secret keys, we would like to construct an authenticated key agreement protocol in which Alice and Bob use W to agree on a nearly uniform key R, by communicating over a public channel controlled by an active adversary Eve. We study this question in the information theoretic setting where the attacker is computationally unbounded. We show that singleround (i.e. one message) protocols do not work when k ≤ n 2, and require poor parameters even when n 2 < k ≪ n. On the other hand, for arbitrary values of k, we design a communication efficient tworound (challengeresponse) protocol extracting nearly k random bits. This dramatically improves the previous construction of Renner and Wolf [RW03], which requires Θ(λ + log(n)) rounds where λ is the security parameter. Our solution takes a new approach by studying and constructing “nonmalleable” seeded randomness extractors — if an attacker sees a random seed X and comes up with an arbitrarily related seed X ′, then we bound the relationship between R = Ext(W; X) and R ′ = Ext(W; X ′). We also extend our tworound key agreement protocol to the “fuzzy ” setting, where Alice and Bob share “close ” (but not equal) secrets WA and WB, and to the Bounded Retrieval Model (BRM) where the size of the secret W is huge.
Semantic security under relatedkey attacks and applications
 Cited on page 4.) 16 M. Bellare. New proofs for NMAC and HMAC: Security without collisionresistance. In C. Dwork, editor, CRYPTO 2006, volume 4117 of LNCS
, 2011
"... In a relatedkey attack (RKA) an adversary attempts to break a cryptographic primitive by invoking the primitive with several secret keys which satisfy some known, or even chosen, relation. We initiate a formal study of RKA security for randomized encryption schemes. We begin by providing general de ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In a relatedkey attack (RKA) an adversary attempts to break a cryptographic primitive by invoking the primitive with several secret keys which satisfy some known, or even chosen, relation. We initiate a formal study of RKA security for randomized encryption schemes. We begin by providing general definitions for semantic security under passive and active RKAs. We then focus on RKAs in which the keys satisfy known linear relations over some Abelian group. We construct simple and efficient schemes which resist such RKAs even when the adversary can choose the linear relation adaptively during the attack. More concretely, we present two approaches for constructing RKAsecure encryption schemes. The first is based on standard randomized encryption schemes which additionally satisfy a natural “keyhomomorphism” property. We instantiate this approach under numbertheoretic or latticebased assumptions such as the Decisional DiffieHellman (DDH) assumption and the Learning Noisy Linear Equations assumption. Our second approach is based on RKAsecure pseudorandom generators. This approach can yield either deterministic, onetime use schemes with optimal ciphertext size or randomized unlimited use schemes. We instantiate this approach by constructing a simple RKAsecure pseurodandom generator
Publickey encryption schemes with auxiliary inputs
 In TCC. 2010. [Fei02] U. Feige. Relations
"... Abstract. We construct publickey cryptosystems that remain secure even when the adversary is given any computationally uninvertible function of the secret key as auxiliary input (even one that may reveal the secret key informationtheoretically). Our schemes are based on the decisional DiffieHellma ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We construct publickey cryptosystems that remain secure even when the adversary is given any computationally uninvertible function of the secret key as auxiliary input (even one that may reveal the secret key informationtheoretically). Our schemes are based on the decisional DiffieHellman (DDH) and the Learning with Errors (LWE) problems. As an independent technical contribution, we extend the GoldreichLevin theorem to provide a hardcore (pseudorandom) value over large fields. 1