Abstract. Landmarks for a planning problem are subgoals that are necessarily made true at some point in the execution of any plan. Since verifying that a fact is a landmark is PSPACE-complete, earlier approaches have focused on finding landmarks for the delete relaxation Π +. Furthermore, some of these approaches have approximated this set of landmarks, although it has been shown that the complete set of causal delete-relaxation landmarks can be identified in polynomial time by a simple procedure over the relaxed planning graph. Here, we give a declarative characterisation of this set of landmarks and show that the procedure computes the landmarks described by our characterisation. Building on this, we observe that the procedure can be applied to any delete-relaxation problem and take advantage of a recent compilation of the m-relaxation of a problem into a problem with no delete effects to extract landmarks that take into account delete effects in the original problem. We demonstrate that this approach finds strictly more causal landmarks than previous approaches and discuss the relationship between increased computational effort and experimental performance, using these landmarks in a recently proposed admissible landmark-counting heuristic. 1

It is well known that there cannot be a single “best ” heuristic for optimal planning in general. One way of overcoming this is by combining admissible heuristics (e.g. by using their maximum), which requires computing numerous heuristic estimates at each state. However, there is a tradeoff between the time spent on computing these heuristic estimates for each state, and the time saved by reducing the number of expanded states. We present a novel method that reduces the cost of combining admissible heuristics for optimal search, while maintaining its benefits. Based on an idealized search space model, we formulate a decision rule for choosing the best heuristic to compute at each state. We then present an active online learning approach for that decision rule, and employ the learned model to decide which heuristic to compute at each state. We evaluate this technique empirically, and show that it substantially outperforms each of the individual heuristics that were used, as well as their regular maximum.

The landmark cut heuristic is perhaps the strongest known polytime admissible approximation of the optimal delete relaxation heuristic h +. Equipped with this heuristic, a best-first search was able to optimally solve 40 % more benchmark problems than the winners of the sequential optimization track of IPC 2008. We show that this heuristic can be understood as a simple relaxation of a hitting set problem, and that stronger heuristics can be obtained by considering stronger relaxations. Based on these findings, we propose a simple polytime method for obtaining heuristics stronger than landmark cut, and evaluate them over benchmark problems. We also show that hitting sets can be used to characterize h + and thus provide a fresh and novel insight for better comprehension of the delete relaxation. 1

The h m (m = 1,...) family of admissible heuristics for STRIPS planning with additive costs generalise the h max heuristic, which results when m = 1. We show that the step from h 1 to h m can be made by changing the planning problem instead of the heuristic function. This furthers our understanding of the h m heuristic, and may inspire application of the same generalisation to admissible heuristics stronger than h max. As an example, we show how it applies to the additive variant of h m obtained via cost splitting.

Abstractions and landmarks are two powerful mechanisms for devising admissible heuristics for classical planning. Here we aim at putting them together by integrating landmark information into abstractions, and propose a concrete realization of this direction suitable for structural-pattern abstractions, as well as for other abstraction heuristics. Our empirical evaluation shows that landmark information can substantially improve the quality of abstraction heuristic estimates.

In this work, we present the FD-Autotune learning planning system, which is based on the idea of domain-specific configuration of the latest, highly parametric version of the Fast Downward Planning Framework by means of a generic automated algorithm configuration procedure. We describe how the extremely large configuration space of Fast Downward was restricted to a subspace that, although still very large, can be managed by a state-of-the-art automated configuration procedure. Additionally, we give preliminary results obtained from applying our approach to the nine domains of the IPC-2011 learning track, using the well-known ParamILS configurator and the recently developed HAL experimentation environment.

A collection of landmarks is complete if the cost of a minimum-cost hitting set equals h + and there is a minimumcost hitting set that is an optimal relaxed plan. We present an algorithm for generating a complete collection of landmarks and we show that this algorithm can be extended into effective polytime heuristics for optimal and satisficing planning. The new admissible heuristics are compared with current state-ofthe-art heuristics for optimal planning on benchmark problems from the IPC.

We present a simple and efficient algorithm to solve deletefree planning problems optimally and calculate the h + heuristic. The algorithm efficiently computes a minimum-cost hitting set for a complete set of disjunctive action landmarks generated on the fly. Unlike other recent approaches, the landmarks it generates are guaranteed to be set-inclusion minimal. In almost all delete-relaxed IPC domains, this leads to a significant coverage and runtime improvement.

When using a planner-based agent architecture, many things can go wrong. First and foremost, an agent might fail to execute one of the planned actions for some reasons. Even more annoying, however, is a situation where the agent is incompetent, i.e., unable to come up with a plan. This might be due to the fact that there are principal reasons that prohibit a successful plan or simply because the task’s description is incomplete or incorrect. In either case, an explanation for such a failure would be very helpful. We will address this problem and provide a formalization of coming up with excuses for not being able to find a plan. Based on that, we will present an algorithm that is able to find excuses and demonstrate that such excuses can be found in practical settings in reasonable time.

Abstractions and landmarks are two powerful mechanisms for devising admissible heuristics for classical planning. Here we aim at putting them together by enhancing problem abstractions with landmark information, and propose a concrete realization of this direction suitable for structuralpattern abstractions. Our preliminary evaluation both provides a proof of concept, and suggests directions for further improvements.