Results 1 -
3 of
3
Representing utility functions via weighted goals.
- Mathematical Logic Quarterly,
, 2009
"... Representing utility functions via weighted goals Uckelman, J.D.; Chevaleyre, Y.; Endriss, U.; Lang, J. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 17 (11 self)
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Representing utility functions via weighted goals Uckelman, J.D.; Chevaleyre, Y.; Endriss, U.; Lang, J. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. We analyze the expressivity, succinctness, and complexity of a family of languages based on weighted propositional formulas for the representation of utility functions. The central idea underlying this form of preference modeling is to associate numerical weights with goals specified in terms of propositional formulas, and to compute the utility value of an alternative as the sum of the weights of the goals it satisfies. We define a large number of representation languages based on this idea, each characterized by a set of restrictions on the syntax of formulas and the range of weights. Our aims are threefold. First, for each language we try to identify the class of utility functions it can express. Second, when different languages can express the same class of utility functions, one may allow for a more succinct representation than another. Therefore, we analyze the relative succinctness of languages. Third, for each language we study the computational complexity of the problem of finding the most preferred alternative given a utility function expressed in that language.
More that the sum of its parts -- Compact Preference Representation Over Combinatorial Domains
, 2009
"... ..."
Compactly Representing Utility Functions Using Weighted Goals and the Max AggregatorI
"... Title Compactly representing utility functions using weighted goals and the max aggregator ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
(Show Context)
Title Compactly representing utility functions using weighted goals and the max aggregator