Results 1 -
5 of
5
Detecting codimension one manifold factors with 0-stitched disks
- Topology Appl
, 2007
"... Abstract. We prove recognition theorems for codimension one manifold factors of dimension n ≥ 4. In particular, we formalize topographical methods and introduce three ribbons properties: the crinkled ribbons property, the twisted crinkled ribbons property, and the fuzzy ribbons property. We show tha ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 4 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We prove recognition theorems for codimension one manifold factors of dimension n ≥ 4. In particular, we formalize topographical methods and introduce three ribbons properties: the crinkled ribbons property, the twisted crinkled ribbons property, and the fuzzy ribbons property. We show that X × R is a manifold in the cases when X is a resolvable generalized manifold of finite dimension n ≥ 3 with either: (1) the crinkled ribbons property; (2) the twisted crinkled ribbons property and the disjoint point disk property; or (3) the fuzzy ribbons property. 1.
THE BING-BORSUK AND THE BUSEMANN CONJECTURES
, 811
"... Abstract. We present two classical conjectures concerning the characterization of manifolds: the Bing Borsuk Conjecture asserts that every n-dimensional homogeneous ANR is a topological n-manifold, whereas the Busemann Conjecture asserts that every n-dimensional G-space is a topological n-manifold. ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. We present two classical conjectures concerning the characterization of manifolds: the Bing Borsuk Conjecture asserts that every n-dimensional homogeneous ANR is a topological n-manifold, whereas the Busemann Conjecture asserts that every n-dimensional G-space is a topological n-manifold. The key object in both cases are so-called generalized manifolds, i.e. ENR homology manifolds. We look at the history, from the early beginnings to the present day. We also list several open problems and related conjectures. 1.
BETWEEN LOWER AND HIGHER DIMENSIONS (in the work of Terry Lawson)
"... There are several approaches to summarizing a mathematician’s research accomplishments, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. This article is based upon a talk given at Tulane that was aimed at a fairly general audience, including faculty members in other areas and graduate students who had ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
There are several approaches to summarizing a mathematician’s research accomplishments, and each has its advantages and disadvantages. This article is based upon a talk given at Tulane that was aimed at a fairly general audience, including faculty members in other areas and graduate students who had taken the usual entry level courses. As such, it is meant to be relatively nontechnical and to emphasize qualitative rather than quantitative issues; in keeping with this aim, references will be given for some standard topological notions that are not normally treated in entry level graduate courses. Since this was an hour talk, it was also not feasible to describe every single piece of published mathematical work that Terry Lawson has ever written; in particular, some papers like [42] and [50] would require lengthy digressions that are not easily related to the central themes in his main lines of research. Instead, we shall focus on some ways in which Terry’s work relates to an important thread in geometric topology; namely, the passage from studying problems in a given dimension to studying problems in the next dimensions. Qualitatively speaking, there are fairly well-developed theories for very low dimensions and for all sufficiently large dimensions, but between these ranges there are some dimensions in which the answers to many fundamental
PROBLEMS ON HOMOLOGY MANIFOLDS
, 2003
"... Abstract. A compilation for the proceedings of the Workshop on Exotic Homology ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. A compilation for the proceedings of the Workshop on Exotic Homology

