Results 1  10
of
10
Decision procedures for algebraic data types with abstractions
 IN 37TH ACM SIGACTSIGPLAN SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES (POPL), 2010. DECISION PROCEDURES FOR ORDERED COLLECTIONS 15 SHE75. SAHARON SHELAH. THE MONADIC THEORY OF ORDER. THA ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS OF MATHEMATICS
, 2010
"... We describe a family of decision procedures that extend the decision procedure for quantifierfree constraints on recursive algebraic data types (term algebras) to support recursive abstraction functions. Our abstraction functions are catamorphisms (term algebra homomorphisms) mapping algebraic data ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe a family of decision procedures that extend the decision procedure for quantifierfree constraints on recursive algebraic data types (term algebras) to support recursive abstraction functions. Our abstraction functions are catamorphisms (term algebra homomorphisms) mapping algebraic data type values into values in other decidable theories (e.g. sets, multisets, lists, integers, booleans). Each instance of our decision procedure family is sound; we identify a widely applicable manytoone condition on abstraction functions that implies the completeness. Complete instances of our decision procedure include the following correctness statements: 1) a functional data structure implementation satisfies a recursively specified invariant, 2) such data structure conforms to a contract given in terms of sets, multisets, lists, sizes, or heights, 3) a transformation of a formula (or lambda term) abstract syntax tree changes the set of free variables in the specified way.
Collections, Cardinalities, and Relations
"... Abstract. Logics that involve collections (sets, multisets), and cardinality constraints are useful for reasoning about unbounded data structures and concurrent processes. To make such logics more useful in verification this paper extends them with the ability to compute direct and inverse relation ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Logics that involve collections (sets, multisets), and cardinality constraints are useful for reasoning about unbounded data structures and concurrent processes. To make such logics more useful in verification this paper extends them with the ability to compute direct and inverse relation and function images. We establish decidability and complexity bounds for the extended logics. 1
Sets with Cardinality Constraints in Satisfiability Modulo Theories
"... Abstract. Boolean Algebra with Presburger Arithmetic (BAPA) is a decidable logic that can express constraints on sets of elements and their cardinalities. Problems from verification of complex properties of software often contain fragments that belong to quantifierfree BAPA (QFBAPA). In contrast to ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Boolean Algebra with Presburger Arithmetic (BAPA) is a decidable logic that can express constraints on sets of elements and their cardinalities. Problems from verification of complex properties of software often contain fragments that belong to quantifierfree BAPA (QFBAPA). In contrast to many other NPcomplete problems (such as quantifierfree firstorder logic or linear arithmetic), the applications of QFBAPA to a broader set of problems has so far been hindered by the lack of an efficient implementation that can be used alongside other efficient decision procedures. We overcome these limitations by extending the efficient SMT solver Z3 with the ability to reason about cardinality (QFBAPA) constraints. Our implementation uses the DPLL(T) mechanism of Z3 to reason about the toplevel propositional structure of a QFBAPA formula, improving the efficiency compared to previous implementations. Moreover, we present a new algorithm for automatically decomposing QFBAPA formulas. Our algorithm alleviates the exponential explosion of considering all Venn regions, significantly improving the tractability of formulas with many set variables. Because it is implemented as a theory plugin, our implementation enables Z3 to prove formulas that use QFBAPA constructs with constructs from other theories that Z3 supports, as well as with quantifiers. We have applied our implementation to the verification of functional programs; we show it can automatically prove formulas that no automated approach was reported to be able to prove before. 1
Combinations of theories for decidable fragments of firstorder logic
"... Abstract. The design of decision procedures for firstorder theories and their combinations has been a very active research subject for thirty years; it has gained practical importance through the development of SMT (satisfiability modulo theories) solvers. Most results concentrate on combining deci ..."
Abstract

Cited by 2 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. The design of decision procedures for firstorder theories and their combinations has been a very active research subject for thirty years; it has gained practical importance through the development of SMT (satisfiability modulo theories) solvers. Most results concentrate on combining decision procedures for data structures such as theories for arrays, bitvectors, fragments of arithmetic, and uninterpreted functions. In particular, the wellknown NelsonOppen scheme for the combination of decision procedures requires the signatures to be disjoint and each theory to be stably infinite; every satisfiable set of literals in a stably infinite theory has an infinite model. In this paper we consider some of the bestknown decidable fragments of firstorder logic with equality, including the Löwenheim class (monadic FOL with equality, but without functions), BernaysSchönfinkelRamsey theories (finite sets of formulas of the form ∃ ∗ ∀ ∗ ϕ, where ϕ is a functionfree and quantifierfree FOL formula), and the twovariable fragment of FOL. In general, these are not stably infinite, and the NelsonOppen scheme cannot be used to integrate them into SMT solvers. Noticing some elementary results about the cardinalities of the models of these theories, we show that they can nevertheless be combined with almost any other decidable theory. 1
On Deciding Functional Lists with Sublist Sets
"... Abstract. Motivated by the problem of deciding verification conditions for the verification of functional programs, we present new decision procedures for automated reasoning about functional lists. We first show how to decide in NP the satisfiability problem for logical constraints containing equal ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Motivated by the problem of deciding verification conditions for the verification of functional programs, we present new decision procedures for automated reasoning about functional lists. We first show how to decide in NP the satisfiability problem for logical constraints containing equality, constructor, selectors, as well as the transitive sublist relation. We then extend this class of constraints with operators to compute the set of all sublists, and the set of objects stored in a list. Finally, we support constraints on sizes of sets, which gives us the ability to compute list length as well as the number of distinct list elements. We show that the extended theory is reducible to the theory of sets with linear cardinality constraints, and therefore still in NP. This reduction enables us to combine our theory with other decidable theories that impose constraints on sets of objects, which further increases the potential of our decidability result in verification of functional and imperative software. 1
Automating Separation Logic Using SMT
"... Abstract. Separation logic (SL) has gained widespread popularity because of its ability to succinctly express complex invariants of a program’s heap configurations. Several specialized provers have been developed for decidable SL fragments. However, these provers cannot be easily extended or combine ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Separation logic (SL) has gained widespread popularity because of its ability to succinctly express complex invariants of a program’s heap configurations. Several specialized provers have been developed for decidable SL fragments. However, these provers cannot be easily extended or combined with solvers for other theories that are important in program verification, e.g., linear arithmetic. In this paper, we present a reduction of decidable SL fragments to a decidable firstorder theory that fits well into the satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) framework. We show how to use this reduction to automate satisfiability, entailment, frame inference, and abduction problems for separation logic using SMT solvers. Our approach provides a simple method of integrating separation logic into existing verification tools that provide SMT backends, and an elegant way of combining SL fragments with other decidable firstorder theories. We implemented this approach in a verification tool and applied it to heapmanipulating programs whose verification involves reasoning in theory combinations.
Decision Procedures for the Temporal Verification of Concurrent Lists
"... Abstract. This paper studies the problem of formally verifying temporal properties of concurrent datatypes. Concurrent datatypes are implementations of classical data abstractions, specially designed to exploit the parallelism available in multiprocessor architectures. The correctness of concurrent ..."
Abstract

Cited by 1 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. This paper studies the problem of formally verifying temporal properties of concurrent datatypes. Concurrent datatypes are implementations of classical data abstractions, specially designed to exploit the parallelism available in multiprocessor architectures. The correctness of concurrent datatypes is essential for the overall correctness of the client software. The main difficulty to reason about concurrent datatypes is due to the simultaneous use of unstructured concurrency and dynamic memory. The first contribution of this paper is the use of deductive temporal verification methods, in particular verification diagrams, enriched with reasoning about dynamic memory. Proofs using verification diagrams are decomposed into a finite collection of verification conditions. Our second contribution is a decision procedure mixing memory regions, pointers and lisplike lists with locks, that allows the automatic verification of the generated verification conditions. We illustrate our techniques proving safety and liveness properties of lockcoupling concurrent lists. 1
On Decision Procedures for Collections, Cardinalities, and Relations
, 2009
"... Abstract. Logics that involve collections (sets, multisets), and cardinality constraints are useful for reasoning about unbounded data structures and concurrent processes. To make such logics more useful in verification this paper extends them with the ability to compute direct and inverse relation ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Logics that involve collections (sets, multisets), and cardinality constraints are useful for reasoning about unbounded data structures and concurrent processes. To make such logics more useful in verification this paper extends them with the ability to compute direct and inverse relation and function images. We establish decidability and complexity bounds for the extended logics. 1
A Proposal for a Theory of Finite Sets, Lists, and Maps for the SMTLib Standard
"... Sets, lists, and maps are elementary data structures used in most programs. Program analysis tools therefore need to decide verification conditions containing variables of such types. We propose a new theory for the SMTLib standard as the standard format for such formulae. 1 ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Sets, lists, and maps are elementary data structures used in most programs. Program analysis tools therefore need to decide verification conditions containing variables of such types. We propose a new theory for the SMTLib standard as the standard format for such formulae. 1
Combining theories: the Ackerman and Guarded Fragments ⋆
"... Abstract. Combination of decision procedures is at the heart of Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers. It provides ways to compose decision procedures for expressive languages which mix symbols from various decidable theories. Typical combinations include (linear) arithmetic, uninterpreted sy ..."
Abstract
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Combination of decision procedures is at the heart of Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers. It provides ways to compose decision procedures for expressive languages which mix symbols from various decidable theories. Typical combinations include (linear) arithmetic, uninterpreted symbols, arrays operators, etc. In [7] we showed that any firstorder theory from the BernaysSchönfinkelRamsey fragment, the two variable fragment, or the monadic fragment can be combined with virtually any other decidable theory. Here, we complete the picture by considering the Ackermann fragment, and several guarded fragments. All theories in these fragments can be combined with other decidable (combinations of) theories, with only minor restrictions. In particular, it is not required for these other theories to be stablyinfinite. 1