Results 1 
3 of
3
A Survey of Fast Exponentiation Methods
 JOURNAL OF ALGORITHMS
, 1998
"... Publickey cryptographic systems often involve raising elements of some group (e.g. GF(2 n), Z/NZ, or elliptic curves) to large powers. An important question is how fast this exponentiation can be done, which often determines whether a given system is practical. The best method for exponentiation de ..."
Abstract

Cited by 155 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Publickey cryptographic systems often involve raising elements of some group (e.g. GF(2 n), Z/NZ, or elliptic curves) to large powers. An important question is how fast this exponentiation can be done, which often determines whether a given system is practical. The best method for exponentiation depends strongly on the group being used, the hardware the system is implemented on, and whether one element is being raised repeatedly to different powers, different elements are raised to a fixed power, or both powers and group elements vary. This problem has received much attention, but the results are scattered through the literature. In this paper we survey the known methods for fast exponentiation, examining their relative strengths and weaknesses.
Open Problems in Number Theoretic Complexity, II
"... this paper contains a list of 36 open problems in numbertheoretic complexity. We expect that none of these problems are easy; we are sure that many of them are hard. This list of problems reflects our own interests and should not be viewed as definitive. As the field changes and becomes deeper, new ..."
Abstract

Cited by 26 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper contains a list of 36 open problems in numbertheoretic complexity. We expect that none of these problems are easy; we are sure that many of them are hard. This list of problems reflects our own interests and should not be viewed as definitive. As the field changes and becomes deeper, new problems will emerge and old problems will lose favor. Ideally there will be other `open problems' papers in future ANTS proceedings to help guide the field. It is likely that some of the problems presented here will remain open for the forseeable future. However, it is possible in some cases to make progress by solving subproblems, or by establishing reductions between problems, or by settling problems under the assumption of one or more well known hypotheses (e.g. the various extended Riemann hypotheses, NP 6= P; NP 6= coNP). For the sake of clarity we have often chosen to state a specific version of a problem rather than a general one. For example, questions about the integers modulo a prime often have natural generalizations to arbitrary finite fields, to arbitrary cyclic groups, or to problems with a composite modulus. Questions about the integers often have natural generalizations to the ring of integers in an algebraic number field, and questions about elliptic curves often generalize to arbitrary curves or abelian varieties. The problems presented here arose from many different places and times. To those whose research has generated these problems or has contributed to our present understanding of them but to whom inadequate acknowledgement is given here, we apologize. Our list of open problems is derived from an earlier `open problems' paper we wrote in 1986 [AM86]. When we wrote the first version of this paper, we feared that the problems presented were so difficult...
MODULAR EXPONENTIATION VIA THE EXPLICIT CHINESE REMAINDER THEOREM
"... Abstract. Fix pairwise coprime positive integers p1, p2,..., ps. We propose representing integers u modulo m, where m is any positive integer up to roughly √ p1p2 · · · ps, as vectors (u mod p1, u mod p2,..., u mod ps). We use this representation to obtain a new result on the parallel complexity o ..."
Abstract

Cited by 8 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Fix pairwise coprime positive integers p1, p2,..., ps. We propose representing integers u modulo m, where m is any positive integer up to roughly √ p1p2 · · · ps, as vectors (u mod p1, u mod p2,..., u mod ps). We use this representation to obtain a new result on the parallel complexity of modular exponentiation: there is an algorithm for the Common CRCW PRAM that, given positive integers x, e, and m in binary, of total bit length n, computes x e mod m in time O(n/lg lg n) using n O(1) processors. 1.