Results 1  10
of
19
Bounds on Treatment Effects from Studies with Imperfect Compliance
 JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
, 1997
"... This paper establishes nonparametric formulas that can be used to bound the average treatment effect in experimental studies in which treatment assignment is random but subject compliance is imperfect. The bounds provided are the tightest possible, given the distribution of assignments, treatment ..."
Abstract

Cited by 56 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper establishes nonparametric formulas that can be used to bound the average treatment effect in experimental studies in which treatment assignment is random but subject compliance is imperfect. The bounds provided are the tightest possible, given the distribution of assignments, treatments, and responses. The formulas show that even with high rates of noncompliance, experimental data can yield useful and sometimes accurate information on the average e#ect of a treatment on the population.
Axioms of Causal Relevance
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1996
"... This paper develops axioms and formal semantics for statements of the form "X is causally irrelevant to Y in context Z," which we interpret to mean "Changing X will not affect Y if we hold Z constant." The axiomization of causal irrelevance is contrasted with the axiomization of informational irr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 54 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper develops axioms and formal semantics for statements of the form "X is causally irrelevant to Y in context Z," which we interpret to mean "Changing X will not affect Y if we hold Z constant." The axiomization of causal irrelevance is contrasted with the axiomization of informational irrelevance, as in "Learning X will not alter our belief in Y , once we know Z." Two versions of causal irrelevance are analyzed, probabilistic and deterministic. We show that, unless stability is assumed, the probabilistic definition yields a very loose structure, that is governed by just two trivial axioms. Under the stability assumption, probabilistic causal irrelevance is isomorphic to path interception in cyclic graphs. Under the deterministic definition, causal irrelevance complies with all of the axioms of path interception in cyclic graphs, with the exception of transitivity. We compare our formalism to that of [Lewis, 1973], and offer a graphical method of proving theorems abou...
An Axiomatic Characterization of Causal Counterfactuals
, 1998
"... This paper studies the causal interpretation of counterfactual sentences using a modifiable structural equation model. It is shown that two properties of counterfactuals, namely, composition and effectiveness, are sound and complete relative to this interpretation, when recursive (i.e., feedback ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (19 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper studies the causal interpretation of counterfactual sentences using a modifiable structural equation model. It is shown that two properties of counterfactuals, namely, composition and effectiveness, are sound and complete relative to this interpretation, when recursive (i.e., feedbackless) models are considered. Composition and effectiveness also hold in Lewis's closestworld semantics, which implies that for recursive models the causal interpretation imposes no restrictions beyond those embodied in Lewis's framework. A third property, called reversibility, holds in nonrecursive causal models but not in Lewis's closestworld semantics, which implies that Lewis's axioms do not capture some properties of systems with feedback. Causal inferences based on counterfactual analysis are exemplified and compared to those based on graphical models.
Learning Probabilistic Networks
 THE KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW
, 1998
"... A probabilistic network is a graphical model that encodes probabilistic relationships between variables of interest. Such a model records qualitative influences between variables in addition to the numerical parameters of the probability distribution. As such it provides an ideal form for combini ..."
Abstract

Cited by 36 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
A probabilistic network is a graphical model that encodes probabilistic relationships between variables of interest. Such a model records qualitative influences between variables in addition to the numerical parameters of the probability distribution. As such it provides an ideal form for combining prior knowledge, which might be limited solely to experience of the influences between some of the variables of interest, and data. In this paper, we first show how data can be used to revise initial estimates of the parameters of a model. We then progress to showing how the structure of the model can be revised as data is obtained. Techniques for learning with incomplete data are also covered.
Causal inference in statistics: An Overview
, 2009
"... This review presents empirical researcherswith recent advances in causal inference, and stresses the paradigmatic shifts that must be undertaken in moving from traditional statistical analysis to causal analysis of multivariate data. Special emphasis is placed on the assumptions that underly all ca ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This review presents empirical researcherswith recent advances in causal inference, and stresses the paradigmatic shifts that must be undertaken in moving from traditional statistical analysis to causal analysis of multivariate data. Special emphasis is placed on the assumptions that underly all causal inferences, the languages used in formulating those assumptions, the conditional nature of all causal and counterfactual claims, and the methods that have been developed for the assessment of such claims. These advances are illustrated using a general theory of causation based on the Structural Causal Model (SCM) described in Pearl (2000a), which subsumes and unifies other approaches to causation, and provides a coherent mathematical foundation for the analysis of causes and counterfactuals. In particular, the paper surveys the development of mathematical tools for inferring (from a combination of data and assumptions) answers to three types of causal queries: (1) queries about the effects of potential interventions, (also called “causal effects ” or “policy evaluation”) (2) queries about probabilities of counterfactuals, (including assessment of “regret, ” “attribution” or “causes of effects”) and (3) queries about direct and indirect effects (also known as “mediation”). Finally, the paper defines the formal and conceptual relationships between the structural and potentialoutcome frameworks and presents tools for a symbiotic analysis that uses the strong features of both.
Identifying Independencies in Causal Graphs with Feedback
 In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference
, 1996
"... We show that the dseparation criterion constitutes a valid test for conditional independence relationships that are induced by feedback systems involving discrete variables. 1 INTRODUCTION It is well known that the dseparation test is sound and complete relative to the independencies assumed in t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 19 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that the dseparation criterion constitutes a valid test for conditional independence relationships that are induced by feedback systems involving discrete variables. 1 INTRODUCTION It is well known that the dseparation test is sound and complete relative to the independencies assumed in the construction of Bayesian networks [Verma and Pearl, 1988, Geiger et al., 1990]. In other words, any dseparation condition in the network corresponds to a genuine independence condition in the underlying probability distribution and, conversely, every dconnection corresponds to a dependency in at least one distribution compatible with the network. The situation with feedback systems is more complicated, primarily because the probability distributions associated with such systems do not lend themselves to a simple product decomposition. The joint distribution of feedback systems cannot be written as a product of the conditional distributions of each child variable, given its parents. Rath...
Instrumentality Tests Revisited
 In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
, 2001
"... An instrument is a random variable that is uncorrelated with certain (unobserved) error terms and, thus, allows the identification of structural parameters in linear models. In nonlinear models, instrumental variables are useful for deriving bounds on causal effects. Few years ago, Pearl introduced ..."
Abstract

Cited by 11 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An instrument is a random variable that is uncorrelated with certain (unobserved) error terms and, thus, allows the identification of structural parameters in linear models. In nonlinear models, instrumental variables are useful for deriving bounds on causal effects. Few years ago, Pearl introduced a necessary test for instruments which permits researchers to identify variables that could not serve as instruments. In this paper, we extend Pearl's result in several directions. In particular, we answer in the armative an open conjecture about the nontestability of instruments in models with unrestricted variables, and we devise new tests for models with discrete and continuous variables.
Causal Inference in the Health Sciences: A Conceptual Introduction
 Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology
, 2001
"... This paper provides a conceptual introduction to causal inference, aimed to assist health services researchers benefit from recent advances in this area. The paper stresses the paradigmatic shifts that must be undertaken in moving from traditional statistical analysis to causal analysis of multivari ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper provides a conceptual introduction to causal inference, aimed to assist health services researchers benefit from recent advances in this area. The paper stresses the paradigmatic shifts that must be undertaken in moving from traditional statistical analysis to causal analysis of multivariate data. Special emphasis is placed on the assumptions that underlie all causal inferences, the languages used in formulating those assumptions, and the conditional nature of causal claims inferred from nonexperimental studies. These emphases are illustrated through a brief survey of recent results, including the control of confounding, corrections for noncompliance, and a symbiosis between counterfactual and graphical methods of analysis.
Inequality constraints in causal models with hidden variables
 In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI06
, 2006
"... We present a class of inequality constraints on the set of distributions induced by local interventions on variables governed by a causal Bayesian network, in which some of the variables remain unmeasured. We derive bounds on causal effects that are not directly measured in randomized experiments. W ..."
Abstract

Cited by 7 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a class of inequality constraints on the set of distributions induced by local interventions on variables governed by a causal Bayesian network, in which some of the variables remain unmeasured. We derive bounds on causal effects that are not directly measured in randomized experiments. We derive instrumental inequality type of constraints on nonexperimental distributions. The results have applications in testing causal models with observational or experimental data. 1
On Identification and Inference for Direct Effects
, 2009
"... Consider the query: Does a binary treatment X have a causal effect on a response Y through a causal pathway that does not involve the intermediate variable M? This query is often rephrased as: Does X have a direct causal effect on Y not through M? Direct effects have been formally defined in three d ..."
Abstract

Cited by 4 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Consider the query: Does a binary treatment X have a causal effect on a response Y through a causal pathway that does not involve the intermediate variable M? This query is often rephrased as: Does X have a direct causal effect on Y not through M? Direct effects have been formally defined in three different ways: the controlled direct effects (CDE), the natural direct effects (i.e. pure and total direct effects PDE and TDE), and the principal stratum direct effects (PSDE). In this issue of the journal, Hafeman and VanderWeele (H&V) 7 provide novel minimal or near minimal conditions for identification of the CDE, PDE and TDE but do not consider the PSDE. In this commentary, we review inference for direct effects and the results of H&V. We also review the close relationship between the direct effects literature and the literature on instrumental variables and Mendelian randomization. 1 Formal Definitions To proceed, we review the formal definitions of the three types of direct effects. We first consider a study with baseline covariates C, a dichotomous treatment X