Results 1 -
2 of
2
Interior-point methods for nonconvex nonlinear programming: Filter methods and merit functions
- Computational Optimization and Applications
, 2002
"... Abstract. In this paper, we present global and local convergence results for an interior-point method for nonlinear programming and analyze the computational performance of its implementation. The algorithm uses an ℓ1 penalty approach to relax all constraints, to provide regularization, and to bound ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 64 (5 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In this paper, we present global and local convergence results for an interior-point method for nonlinear programming and analyze the computational performance of its implementation. The algorithm uses an ℓ1 penalty approach to relax all constraints, to provide regularization, and to bound the Lagrange multipliers. The penalty problems are solved using a simplified version of Chen and Goldfarb’s strictly feasible interior-point method [12]. The global convergence of the algorithm is proved under mild assumptions, and local analysis shows that it converges Q-quadratically for a large class of problems. The proposed approach is the first to simultaneously have all of the following properties while solving a general nonconvex nonlinear programming problem: (1) the convergence analysis does not assume boundedness of dual iterates, (2) local convergence does not require the Linear Independence Constraint Qualification, (3) the solution of the penalty problem is shown to locally converge to optima that may not satisfy the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions, and (4) the algorithm is applicable to mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints. Numerical testing on a set of general nonlinear programming problems, including degenerate problems and infeasible problems, confirm the theoretical results. We also provide comparisons to a highly-efficient nonlinear solver and thoroughly analyze the effects of enforcing theoretical convergence guarantees on the computational performance of the algorithm. 1.
Payment Cost Minimization Auction for Deregulated Electricity Markets With Transmission Capacity Constraints
"... Abstract—Deregulated electricity markets in the U.S. currently use an auction mechanism that minimizes total supply bid costs to select bids and their levels. Payments are then settled based on market-clearingprices. Under this setup, the consumer payments could be significantly higher than the mini ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract—Deregulated electricity markets in the U.S. currently use an auction mechanism that minimizes total supply bid costs to select bids and their levels. Payments are then settled based on market-clearingprices. Under this setup, the consumer payments could be significantly higher than the minimized bid costs obtained from auctions. This gives rise to “payment cost minimization,” an alternative auction mechanism that minimizes consumer payments. We previously presented an augmented Lagrangian and surrogate optimization framework to solve payment cost minimization problems without considering transmission. This paper extends that approach to incorporate transmission capacity constraints. The consideration of transmission constraints complicates the problem by entailing power flow and introducing locational marginal orices (LMPs). DC power flow is used for simplicity and LMPs are defined by “economic dispatch ” for the selected supply bids. To characterize LMPs that appear in the payment cost objective function, Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions of economic dispatch are established and embedded as constraints. The reformulated problem is difficult in view of the complex role of LMPs and the violation of constraint qualifications caused by the complementarity constraints of KKT conditions. Our key idea is to extend the surrogate optimization framework and use a regularization technique. Specific methods to satisfy the “surrogate optimization condition ” in the presence of transmission capacity constraints are highlighted. Numerical testing results of small examples and the IEEE Reliability Test System with randomly generated supply bids demonstrate the quality, effectiveness, and scalability of the method. Index Terms—Deregulated electricity markets, electricity auctions, locational marginal price (LMP), mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints, payment cost minimization, surrogate optimization, transmission constraints. I.

