Results 1 -
4 of
4
Integrated Metamodeling and Diagnosis in OWL 2
"... Abstract. Ontological metamodeling has a variety of applications yet only very restricted forms are supported by OWL 2 directly. We propose a novel encoding scheme enabling class-based metamodeling inside the domain ontology with full reasoning support through standard OWL 2 reasoning systems. We de ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 1 (1 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. Ontological metamodeling has a variety of applications yet only very restricted forms are supported by OWL 2 directly. We propose a novel encoding scheme enabling class-based metamodeling inside the domain ontology with full reasoning support through standard OWL 2 reasoning systems. We demonstrate the usefulness of our method by applying it to the OntoClean methodology. En passant, we address performance problems arising from the inconsistency diagnosis strategy originally proposed for OntoClean by introducing an alternative technique where sources of conflicts are indicated by means of marker predicates. 1
An Approach to Description Logic with Support for Propositional Attitudes and Belief Fusion ⋆
"... Abstract. In the (Semantic) Web, the existence or producibility of certain, consensually agreed or authoritative knowledge cannot be assumed, and criteria to judge the trustability and reputation of knowledge sources may not be given. These issues give rise to formalizations of web information which ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract. In the (Semantic) Web, the existence or producibility of certain, consensually agreed or authoritative knowledge cannot be assumed, and criteria to judge the trustability and reputation of knowledge sources may not be given. These issues give rise to formalizations of web information which factor in heterogeneous and possibly inconsistent assertions and intentions, and make such heterogeneity explicit and manageable for reasoning mechanisms. Such approaches can provide valuable metaknowledge in contemporary application fields, like open or distributed ontologies, social software, ranking and recommender systems, and domains with a high amount of controversies, such as politics and culture. As an approach to this, we introduce a lean formalism for the Semantic Web which allows for the explicit representation of controversial individual and group opinions and goals by means of so-called social contexts, and optionally for the probabilistic belief merging of uncertain or conflicting statements. Doing so, our approach generalizes concepts such as provenance annotation and voting in the context of ontologies and other kinds of Semantic Web knowledge.
Towards Interoperable Metadata Provenance
"... Abstract—Linked data has finally arrived. But with the availability and actual usage of linked data, data from different sources gets quickly mixed and merged. While there is a lot of fundamental work about the provenance of metadata and the commonly recognized demand for expressing provenance infor ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Abstract—Linked data has finally arrived. But with the availability and actual usage of linked data, data from different sources gets quickly mixed and merged. While there is a lot of fundamental work about the provenance of metadata and the commonly recognized demand for expressing provenance information, there still is no standard or at least best-practice recommendation. In this paper, we summarize our own requirements based on experiences at the Mannheim University Library for metadata provenance, examine the feasibility to implement these requirements with currently available (de-facto) standards, and propose a way to bridge the missing gaps. By this paper, we hope to obtain additional feedback, which we will feed back into ongoing discussions within the recently founded DCMI task-group on metadata provenance. I.
Contextual Representation and Reasoning with Description Logics
"... Despite most of the information available in the Semantic Web (SW) is context dependent, there is a lack of mechanism to qualify knowledge with the context in which it is supposed to hold. In the current practice, contextual information is often crafted in the ontology identifier or in the annotatio ..."
Abstract
- Add to MetaCart
Despite most of the information available in the Semantic Web (SW) is context dependent, there is a lack of mechanism to qualify knowledge with the context in which it is supposed to hold. In the current practice, contextual information is often crafted in the ontology identifier or in the annotations, non of which affects reasoning. Extensions

