Results 1  10
of
49
Decision Problems for Propositional Linear Logic
, 1990
"... Linear logic, introduced by Girard, is a refinement of classical logic with a natural, intrinsic accounting of resources. We show that unlike most other propositional (quantifierfree) logics, full propositional linear logic is undecidable. Further, we prove that without the modal storage operator, ..."
Abstract

Cited by 90 (17 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Linear logic, introduced by Girard, is a refinement of classical logic with a natural, intrinsic accounting of resources. We show that unlike most other propositional (quantifierfree) logics, full propositional linear logic is undecidable. Further, we prove that without the modal storage operator, which indicates unboundedness of resources, the decision problem becomes pspacecomplete. We also establish membership in np for the multiplicative fragment, npcompleteness for the multiplicative fragment extended with unrestricted weakening, and undecidability for certain fragments of noncommutative propositional linear logic. 1 Introduction Linear logic, introduced by Girard [14, 18, 17], is a refinement of classical logic which may be derived from a Gentzenstyle sequent calculus axiomatization of classical logic in three steps. The resulting sequent system Lincoln@CS.Stanford.EDU Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, and the Computer Science Labo...
A Term Calculus for Intuitionistic Linear Logic
, 1993
"... . In this paper we consider the problem of deriving a term assignment system for Girard's Intuitionistic Linear Logic for both the sequent calculus and natural deduction proof systems. Our system differs from previous calculi (e.g. that of Abramsky [1]) and has two important properties which they la ..."
Abstract

Cited by 72 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. In this paper we consider the problem of deriving a term assignment system for Girard's Intuitionistic Linear Logic for both the sequent calculus and natural deduction proof systems. Our system differs from previous calculi (e.g. that of Abramsky [1]) and has two important properties which they lack. These are the substitution property (the set of valid deductions is closed under substitution) and subject reduction (reduction on terms is welltyped). We also consider term reduction arising from cutelimination in the sequent calculus and normalisation in natural deduction. We explore the relationship between these and consider their computational content. 1 Intuitionistic Linear Logic Girard's Intuitionistic Linear Logic [3] is a refinement of Intuitionistic Logic where formulae must be used exactly once. Given this restriction the familiar logical connectives become divided into multiplicative and additive versions. Within this paper, we shall only consider the multiplicatives. Int...
Light Affine Logic
 ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC
, 1998
"... Much effort has been recently devoted to the study of polytime formal (and especially logical) systems [GSS92, LM93, Le94, Gi96]. The purpose of such systems is manyfold. On the theoretical side, they provide a better understanding of what is the logical essence of polytime reduction (and other comp ..."
Abstract

Cited by 56 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Much effort has been recently devoted to the study of polytime formal (and especially logical) systems [GSS92, LM93, Le94, Gi96]. The purpose of such systems is manyfold. On the theoretical side, they provide a better understanding of what is the logical essence of polytime reduction (and other complexity classes). On the practical side, via the well known CurryHoward correspondence, they yield sophisticated typing systems, where types provide (statically) an accurate upper bound on the complexity of the computation. Even more, the type annotations give essential information on the "efficient way" to reduce the term. The most promising of these logical systems is Girard 's Light Linear Logic [Gi96] (see the same paper for a comparison with other approaches). In this paper, we introduce a slight variation of LLL, by adding full weakening (for this reason, we call it Light Affine Logic). This modification does not alter the good complexity properties of LLL: cutelimination is still pol...
A Brief Guide to Linear Logic
, 1993
"... An overview of linear logic is given, including an extensive bibliography and a simple example of the close relationship between linear logic and computation. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 53 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
An overview of linear logic is given, including an extensive bibliography and a simple example of the close relationship between linear logic and computation.
Term Assignment for Intuitionistic Linear Logic
, 1992
"... In this paper we consider the problem of deriving a term assignment system for Girard's Intuitionistic Linear Logic for both the sequent calculus and natural deduction proof systems. Our system differs from previous calculi (e.g. that of Abramsky) and has two important properties which they lack. Th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 53 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we consider the problem of deriving a term assignment system for Girard's Intuitionistic Linear Logic for both the sequent calculus and natural deduction proof systems. Our system differs from previous calculi (e.g. that of Abramsky) and has two important properties which they lack. These are the substitution property (the set of valid deductions is closed under substitution) and subject reduction (reduction on terms is welltyped). We define a simple (but more general than previous proposals) categorical model for Intuitionistic Linear Logic and show how this can be used to derive the term assignment system. We also consider term reduction arising from cutelimination in the sequent calculus and normalisation in natural deduction. We explore the relationship between these, as well as with the equations which follow from our categorical model.
Soft Linear Logic and Polynomial Time
 THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 2002
"... We present a subsystem of second order Linear Logic with restricted rules for exponentials so that proofs correspond to polynomial time algorithms, and viceversa. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 48 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a subsystem of second order Linear Logic with restricted rules for exponentials so that proofs correspond to polynomial time algorithms, and viceversa.
Applications of Linear Logic to Computation: An Overview
, 1993
"... This paper is an overview of existing applications of Linear Logic (LL) to issues of computation. After a substantial introduction to LL, it discusses the implications of LL to functional programming, logic programming, concurrent and objectoriented programming and some other applications of LL, li ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This paper is an overview of existing applications of Linear Logic (LL) to issues of computation. After a substantial introduction to LL, it discusses the implications of LL to functional programming, logic programming, concurrent and objectoriented programming and some other applications of LL, like semantics of negation in LP, nonmonotonic issues in AI planning, etc. Although the overview covers pretty much the stateoftheart in this area, by necessity many of the works are only mentioned and referenced, but not discussed in any considerable detail. The paper does not presuppose any previous exposition to LL, and is addressed more to computer scientists (probably with a theoretical inclination) than to logicians. The paper contains over 140 references, of which some 80 are about applications of LL. 1 Linear Logic Linear Logic (LL) was introduced in 1987 by Girard [62]. From the very beginning it was recognized as relevant to issues of computation (especially concurrency and stat...
Fixpoint Logics, Relational Machines, and Computational Complexity
 In Structure and Complexity
, 1993
"... We establish a general connection between fixpoint logic and complexity. On one side, we have fixpoint logic, parameterized by the choices of 1storder operators (inflationary or noninflationary) and iteration constructs (deterministic, nondeterministic, or alternating). On the other side, we have t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 36 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We establish a general connection between fixpoint logic and complexity. On one side, we have fixpoint logic, parameterized by the choices of 1storder operators (inflationary or noninflationary) and iteration constructs (deterministic, nondeterministic, or alternating). On the other side, we have the complexity classes between P and EXPTIME. Our parameterized fixpoint logics capture the complexity classes P, NP, PSPACE, and EXPTIME, but equality is achieved only over ordered structures. There is, however, an inherent mismatch between complexity and logic  while computational devices work on encodings of problems, logic is applied directly to the underlying mathematical structures. To overcome this mismatch, we develop a theory of relational complexity, which bridges tha gap between standard complexity and fixpoint logic. On one hand, we show that questions about containments among standard complexity classes can be translated to questions about containments among relational complex...
Database Query Languages Embedded in the Typed Lambda Calculus
, 1993
"... We investigate the expressive power of the typed calculus when expressing computations over finite structures, i.e., databases. We show that the simply typed calculus can express various database query languages such as the relational algebra, fixpoint logic, and the complex object algebra. In ..."
Abstract

Cited by 25 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate the expressive power of the typed calculus when expressing computations over finite structures, i.e., databases. We show that the simply typed calculus can express various database query languages such as the relational algebra, fixpoint logic, and the complex object algebra. In our embeddings, inputs and outputs are terms encoding databases, and a program expressing a query is a term which types when applied to an input and reduces to an output.
Linear Logic
, 1992
"... this paper we will restrict attention to propositional linear logic. The sequent calculus notation, due to Gentzen [10], uses roman letters for propositions, and greek letters for sequences of formulas. A sequent is composed of two sequences of formulas separated by a `, or turnstile symbol. One may ..."
Abstract

Cited by 24 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we will restrict attention to propositional linear logic. The sequent calculus notation, due to Gentzen [10], uses roman letters for propositions, and greek letters for sequences of formulas. A sequent is composed of two sequences of formulas separated by a `, or turnstile symbol. One may read the sequent \Delta ` \Gamma as asserting that the multiplicative conjunction of the formulas in \Delta together imply the multiplicative disjunction of the formulas in \Gamma. A sequent calculus proof rule consists of a set of hypothesis sequents, displayed above a horizontal line, and a single conclusion sequent, displayed below the line, as below: Hypothesis1 Hypothesis2 Conclusion 4 Connections to Other Logics