This paper proposes a new theory of the relationship between the sentence processing mechanism and the available computational resources. This theory -- the Syntactic Prediction Locality Theory (SPLT) -- has two components: an integration cost component and a component for the memory cost associated with keeping track of obligatory syntactic requirements. Memory cost is

Abstract not found

A large amount of recent research has shown that two-year-olds know much of the syntax of their language, particularly the system of inflection and verb

MacWhinney (1978) presented a computational model of the acquisition of morphophonology. The present chapter attempts to extend the model presented in that earlier paper to the acquisition of word-order patterns. This extension is supported by an examination of the previous research on syntactic acquisition. In the final section of the chapter, further possible extensions to phonology and semantics are considered. The crucial claim underlying the basic approach to both morphophonology and syntax is that use of a given rule system is governed by a system of alternative strategies. Within such a multileveled model, alternative strategies can be compared in terms of their relative complexity. In the present chapter, these alternative strategies are evaluated through application of the following analytic technique: 1. A relatively simple strategy that can account for at least some of the observed data is presented. 2. It is shown that there are at least some data that are best explained by this strategy. 3. It is shown that, at some point in development, the child produces forms that cannot be explained by this simple strategy alone. 4. A strategy of somewhat greater complexity and power is introduced and it is shown that this strategy can account for at least some of the data not explained by the simpler (and weaker) strategy. This line of argumentation proceeds until evidence has been presented for six alternative strategies in word-order processing.

“Origins of communicative disorders ” to Elizabeth Bates, and by a grant from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. We are grateful to Larry Juarez and Meiti Opie The effects of focal brain injury are investigated in the first stages of language development, during the passage from first words to grammar. Parent report and/or free speech data are reported for 53 infants and preschool children between 10- 44 months of age. All children had suffered a single, unilateral brain injury to the left or right hemisphere, incurred before six months of age (usually in the pre- or perinatal period). This is the period in which we should expect to see maximal plasticity, but it is also the period in which the initial specializations of particular cortical regions ought to be most evident. In direct contradiction of hypotheses based on the adult aphasia literature, results from 10- 17 months suggest that children with righthemisphere injuries are at greater risk for delays in word comprehension, and in the gestures that normally precede and accompany language onset. Although there were no differences between left- vs. right-hemisphere injury per se on expressive language, children whose lesions include the left temporal lobe did show significantly greater delays in expressive vocabulary and

To learn a language, the learners must first learn its words, the essential building blocks for utterances. The difficulty in learning words lies in the unavailability of explicit word boundaries in speech input. The learners have to infer lexical items with some innately endowed learning mechanism(s) for regularity detection- regularities in the speech normally indicate word patterns. With respect to Zipf's least-effort principle and Chomsky's thoughts on the minimality of grammar for human language, we hypothesise a cognitive mechanism underlying language learning that seeks for the least-effort representation for input data. Accordingly, lexical learning is to infer the minimal-cost representation for the input under the constraint of permissible representation for lexical items. The main theme of this thesis is to examine how far this learning mechanism can go in unsupervised lexical learning from real language data without any pre-defined (e.g., prosodic and phonotactic) cues, but entirely resting on statistical induction of structural patterns for the most economic representation for the data. We first review

Abstract not found

Many of the earliest studies of child language acquisition were collected in the form of

Abstract not found

The majority of studies in children’s acquisition of syntax have focused on production. However, research suggests that infants understand more about their language than they are themselves producing. The current work focused on one aspect of early syntax, the inflectional marker, –s, which functions both as a plural nominal inflection and the 3 ii rd person singular verbal inflection, in the receptive domain. The properties of the use of such inflectional markers by young children have generated a great deal of theoretical interest in the production literature. Experiments 1 and 2 tested 19-month-olds ’ sensitivity to this marker in singular, plural, and ungrammatical contexts, using the Headturn Preference Procedure. These infants preferred listening to grammatical passages when compared with uninflected ungrammatical passages, but showed no preference when compared with doubly inflected ungrammatical passages. This finding contradicts those in the productive domain, in which young children are much more likely to produce errors of omission than