Results 1  10
of
63
Comparing the Expressive Power of the Synchronous and the Asynchronous picalculi
, 2002
"... this paper we focus on the distinction between synchronous and asynchronous. Synchronous communication is usually understood as simultaneous exchange of information between the partners; a"real life" example is the telephone . In contrast, in asynchronous communication the action of sending a mes ..."
Abstract

Cited by 160 (23 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper we focus on the distinction between synchronous and asynchronous. Synchronous communication is usually understood as simultaneous exchange of information between the partners; a"real life" example is the telephone . In contrast, in asynchronous communication the action of sending a message and the action of reading it Work supported by the NSFPOWRE grant EIA0074909
An Asynchronous Model of Locality, Failure, and Process Mobility
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1997
"... We present a model of distributed computation which is based on a fragment of the picalculus relying on asynchronous communication. We enrich the model with the following features: the explicit distribution of processes to locations, the failure of locations and their detection, and the mobility of ..."
Abstract

Cited by 117 (4 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a model of distributed computation which is based on a fragment of the picalculus relying on asynchronous communication. We enrich the model with the following features: the explicit distribution of processes to locations, the failure of locations and their detection, and the mobility of processes. Our contributions are two folds. At the specification level, we give a synthetic and flexible formalization of the features mentioned above. At the verification level, we provide original methods to reason about the bisimilarity of processes in the presence of failures.
Decoding Choice Encodings
, 1999
"... We study two encodings of the asynchronous #calculus with inputguarded choice into its choicefree fragment. One encoding is divergencefree, but refines the atomic commitment of choice into gradual commitment. The other preserves atomicity, but introduces divergence. The divergent encoding is ..."
Abstract

Cited by 97 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We study two encodings of the asynchronous #calculus with inputguarded choice into its choicefree fragment. One encoding is divergencefree, but refines the atomic commitment of choice into gradual commitment. The other preserves atomicity, but introduces divergence. The divergent encoding is fully abstract with respect to weak bisimulation, but the more natural divergencefree encoding is not. Instead, we show that it is fully abstract with respect to coupled simulation, a slightly coarserbut still coinductively definedequivalence that does not enforce bisimilarity of internal branching decisions. The correctness proofs for the two choice encodings introduce a novel proof technique exploiting the properties of explicit decodings from translations to source terms.
On Asynchrony in NamePassing Calculi
 In
, 1998
"... The asynchronous picalculus is considered the basis of experimental programming languages (or proposal of programming languages) like Pict, Join, and Blue calculus. However, at a closer inspection, these languages are based on an even simpler calculus, called Local (L), where: (a) only the output c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 88 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The asynchronous picalculus is considered the basis of experimental programming languages (or proposal of programming languages) like Pict, Join, and Blue calculus. However, at a closer inspection, these languages are based on an even simpler calculus, called Local (L), where: (a) only the output capability of names may be transmitted; (b) there is no matching or similar constructs for testing equality between names. We study the basic operational and algebraic theory of Lpi. We focus on bisimulationbased behavioural equivalences, precisely on barbed congruence. We prove two coinductive characterisations of barbed congruence in Lpi, and some basic algebraic laws. We then show applications of this theory, including: the derivability of delayed input; the correctness of an optimisation of the encoding of callbyname lambdacalculus; the validity of some laws for Join.
What is a `Good' Encoding of Guarded Choice?
 INFORMATION AND COMPUTATION
, 1997
"... The calculus with synchronous output and mixedguarded choices is strictly more expressive than the calculus with asynchronous output and no choice. As a corollary, Palamidessi recently proved that there is no fully compositional encoding from the former into the latter that preserves divergenc ..."
Abstract

Cited by 67 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The calculus with synchronous output and mixedguarded choices is strictly more expressive than the calculus with asynchronous output and no choice. As a corollary, Palamidessi recently proved that there is no fully compositional encoding from the former into the latter that preserves divergencefreedom and symmetries. This paper shows
Proof Techniques for Cryptographic Processes
 in 14th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
, 1999
"... Contextual equivalences for cryptographic process calculi, like the spicalculus, can be used to reason about correctness of protocols, but their definition suffers from quantification over all possible contexts. Here, we focus on two such equivalences, namely maytesting and barbed equivalence, and ..."
Abstract

Cited by 60 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Contextual equivalences for cryptographic process calculi, like the spicalculus, can be used to reason about correctness of protocols, but their definition suffers from quantification over all possible contexts. Here, we focus on two such equivalences, namely maytesting and barbed equivalence, and investigate tractable proof methods for them. To this aim, we design an enriched labelled transition system, where transitions are constrained by the knowledge the environment has of names and keys. The new transition system is then used to define a trace equivalence and a weak bisimulation equivalence, that avoid quantification over contexts. Our main results are soundness and completeness of trace and weak bisimulation equivalence with respect to maytesting and barbed equivalence, respectively. They lead to more direct proof methods for equivalence checking. The use of these methods is illustrated with a few examples, concerning implementation of secure channels and verification of proto...
A Hierarchy of Equivalences for Asynchronous Calculi
, 2003
"... We generate a natural hierarchy of equivalences for asynchronous namepassing process calculi from simple variations on Milner and Sangiorgi's definition of weak barbed bisimulation. The calculus, used here, and the join calculus are examples of such calculi. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 58 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We generate a natural hierarchy of equivalences for asynchronous namepassing process calculi from simple variations on Milner and Sangiorgi's definition of weak barbed bisimulation. The calculus, used here, and the join calculus are examples of such calculi.
Bisimulations in the joincalculus
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1998
"... We propose an objectoriented calculus with internal concurrency and classbased inheritance that is built upon the join calculus. Method calls, locks, and states are handled in a uniform manner, using asynchronous messages. Classes are partial message definitions that can be combined and transforme ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We propose an objectoriented calculus with internal concurrency and classbased inheritance that is built upon the join calculus. Method calls, locks, and states are handled in a uniform manner, using asynchronous messages. Classes are partial message definitions that can be combined and transformed. We design operators for behavioral and synchronization inheritance. We also give a type system that statically enforces basic safety properties. Our model is compatible with the JoCaml implementation
A Process Algebraic View of Linda Coordination Primitives
, 1998
"... The main Linda coordination primitives (asynchronous communication, read operation, nonblocking in/rd predicates) are studied in a process algebraic setting. A lattice of eight languages is proposed, where its bottom element L is a process algebra differing from CCS only for the asynchrony of the ou ..."
Abstract

Cited by 43 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The main Linda coordination primitives (asynchronous communication, read operation, nonblocking in/rd predicates) are studied in a process algebraic setting. A lattice of eight languages is proposed, where its bottom element L is a process algebra differing from CCS only for the asynchrony of the output operation, while all the other languages in the lattice are obtained as extension of this basic language by adding some of the Linda coordination primitives. The observational semantics for these languages are all obtained as the coarsest congruences contained in the barbed semantics, where only tuples are observable. The lattice of the eight languages collapses to a smaller fourpoints lattice of different bisimulationbased semantics. Notably, for L this semantics is the standard notion of strong bisimulation, where inputs and outputs/tuples are treated symmetrically. Keywords: Coordination languages, Semantics of Linda, Process algebra. 1 Introduction The aim of this paper is to pr...