Results 1  10
of
40
Combining Partial Order Reductions with Onthefly Modelchecking
, 1994
"... Abstract Partial order modelchecking is an approach to reduce time and memory in modelchecking concurrent programs. Onthefly modelchecking is a technique to eliminate part of the search by intersecting an automaton representing the (negation of the) checked property with the state space during i ..."
Abstract

Cited by 191 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Abstract Partial order modelchecking is an approach to reduce time and memory in modelchecking concurrent programs. Onthefly modelchecking is a technique to eliminate part of the search by intersecting an automaton representing the (negation of the) checked property with the state space during its generation. We prove conditions under which these two methods can be combined in order to gain reduction from both methods. An extension of the modelchecker SPIN, which implements this combination, is studied, showing substantial reduction over traditional search, not only in the number of reachable states, but directly in the amount of memory and time used. We also describe how to apply partialorder modelchecking under given fairness assumptions.
All from one, one for all: on model checking using representatives
 LNCS
, 1993
"... Checking that a given finite state program satisfies a linear temporal logic property is suffering in many cases from a severe space and time explosion. One way to cope with this is to reduce the state graph used for model checking. We define an equivalence relation between infinite sequences, based ..."
Abstract

Cited by 150 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Checking that a given finite state program satisfies a linear temporal logic property is suffering in many cases from a severe space and time explosion. One way to cope with this is to reduce the state graph used for model checking. We define an equivalence relation between infinite sequences, based on infinite traces such that for each equivalence class, either all or none of the sequences satisfy the checked formula. We present an algorithm for constructing a state graph that contains at least one representative sequence for each equivalence class. This allows applying existing model checking algorithms to the reduced state graph rather than on the larger full state graph of the program. It also allows model checking under fairness assumptions, and exploits these assumptions to obtain smaller state graphs. A formula rewriting technique is presented to allow coarser equivalence relation among sequences, such that less representatives are needed. 1
The ForSpec Temporal Logic: A New Temporal PropertySpecification Language
, 2001
"... In this paper we describe the ForSpec Temporal Logic (FTL), the new temporal propertyspecification logic of ForSpec, Intel's new formal specification language. The key features of FTL are as follows: it is a linear temporal logic, based on Pnueli's LTL, it is based on a rich set of logical and a ..."
Abstract

Cited by 79 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this paper we describe the ForSpec Temporal Logic (FTL), the new temporal propertyspecification logic of ForSpec, Intel's new formal specification language. The key features of FTL are as follows: it is a linear temporal logic, based on Pnueli's LTL, it is based on a rich set of logical and arithmetical operations on bit vectors to describe state properties, it enables the user to define temporal connectives over time windows, it enables the user to define regular events, which are regular sequences of Boolean events, and then relate such events via special connectives, it enables the user to express properties about the past, and it includes constructs that enable the user to model multiple clock and reset signals, which is useful in the verification of hardware design.
Completing the Temporal Picture
, 1991
"... The paper presents a relatively complete proof system for proving the validity of temporal properties of reactive programs. The presented proof system improves on previous temporal systems, in that it reduces the validity of program properties into pure assertional reasoning, not involving additiona ..."
Abstract

Cited by 74 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The paper presents a relatively complete proof system for proving the validity of temporal properties of reactive programs. The presented proof system improves on previous temporal systems, in that it reduces the validity of program properties into pure assertional reasoning, not involving additional temporal reasoning. The proof system is based on the classification of temporal properties according to the Borel hierarchy, providing appropriate proof rules for the classes of safety, response, and reactivity properties.
The Anchored Version of the Temporal Framework
 Linear Time, Branching Time, and Partial Order in Logics and Models for Concurrency, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 354
, 1989
"... . In this survey paper we present some of the recent developments in the temporal formal system for the specification, verification and development of reactive programs. While the general methodology remains very much the one presented in some earlier works on the subject, such as [MP83c, MP83a, Pnu ..."
Abstract

Cited by 50 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. In this survey paper we present some of the recent developments in the temporal formal system for the specification, verification and development of reactive programs. While the general methodology remains very much the one presented in some earlier works on the subject, such as [MP83c, MP83a, Pnu86], there have been several technical improvements and gained insights in understanding the computational model, the logic itself, the proof system and its presentation, and connections with alternative formalisms, such as finite automata. In this paper we explicate some of these improvements and extensions. The main difference between this and preceding versions is that here we consider a notion of validity for temporal formulae, which is anchored at the initial state of the computation. The paper discusses some of the consequences of this decision. Key words: Temporal Logic, Reactive Systems, Concurrent Programs, Specification, Verification, Proof System, Classification of Prtoperties, Sa...
Verification of Concurrent Programs: The AutomataTheoretic Framework
 Annals of Pure and Applied Logic
, 1987
"... We present an automatatheoretic framework to the verification of concurrent and nondeterministic programs. The basic idea is that to verify that a program P is correct one writes a program A that receives the computation of P as input and diverges only on incorrect computations of P . Now P is c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 47 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present an automatatheoretic framework to the verification of concurrent and nondeterministic programs. The basic idea is that to verify that a program P is correct one writes a program A that receives the computation of P as input and diverges only on incorrect computations of P . Now P is correct if and only if a program PA , obtained by combining P and A, terminates. We formalize this idea in a framework of !automata with a recursive set of states. This unifies previous works on verification of fair termination and verification of temporal properties. 1 Introduction In this paper we present an automatatheoretic framework that unifies several trends in the area of concurrent program verification. The trends are temporal logic, model checking, automata theory, and fair termination. Let us start with a survey of these trends. In 1977 Pnueli suggested the use of temporal logic in the verification of concurrent programs [Pn77]. The basic motivation is that in the verificat...
Modal Logics and muCalculi: An Introduction
, 2001
"... We briefly survey the background and history of modal and temporal logics. We then concentrate on the modal mucalculus, a modal logic which subsumes most other commonly used logics. We provide an informal introduction, followed by a summary of the main theoretical issues. We then look at modelchec ..."
Abstract

Cited by 44 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We briefly survey the background and history of modal and temporal logics. We then concentrate on the modal mucalculus, a modal logic which subsumes most other commonly used logics. We provide an informal introduction, followed by a summary of the main theoretical issues. We then look at modelchecking, and finally at the relationship of modal logics to other formalisms.
Verifying Temporal Properties without Temporal Logic
, 1989
"... this paper were first presented at the "IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science," Ithaca, New York, June 1987 ..."
Abstract

Cited by 37 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper were first presented at the "IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science," Ithaca, New York, June 1987
Certifying Model Checkers
 In 13th International Conference Computer Aided Verification
, 2001
"... Model Checking is an algorithmic technique to determine whether a temporal property holds of a program. For linear time properties, a model checker produces a counterexample computation if the check fails. This computation acts as a "certificate" of failure, as it can be checked easily and indep ..."
Abstract

Cited by 34 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Model Checking is an algorithmic technique to determine whether a temporal property holds of a program. For linear time properties, a model checker produces a counterexample computation if the check fails. This computation acts as a "certificate" of failure, as it can be checked easily and independently of the model checker by simulating it on the program. On the other hand, no such certificate is produced if the check succeeds. In this paper, we show how this asymmetry can be eliminated with a certifying model checker. The key idea is that, with some extra bookkeeping, a model checker can produce a deductive proof on either success or failure. This proof acts as a certificate of the result, as it can be checked mechanically by simple, nonfixpoint methods that are independent of the model checker. We develop a deductive proof system for verifying branching time properties expressed in the mucalculus, and show how to generate a proof in this system from a model checking run. Proofs for linear time properties form a special case. A model checker that generates proofs can be used for many interesting applications, such as better ways of exploring errors in a program, and a tight integration of model checking with automated theorem proving. 1