• Documents
  • Authors
  • Tables
  • Log in
  • Sign up
  • MetaCart
  • DMCA
  • Donate

CiteSeerX logo

Advanced Search Include Citations
Advanced Search Include Citations | Disambiguate

Responses to auditory stimuli in macaque lateral intraparietal area: II. Behavioral modulation, (1999)

by J F Linden, A Grunewald, R A Andersen
Venue:J. Neurophysiol.
Add To MetaCart

Tools

Sorted by:
Results 1 - 9 of 9

Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction

by Jon Driver, Patrik Vuilleumier , 2001
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 115 (12 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...of neurons in the parietal lobe and related areas is that many have been shown to respond to stimuli in several modalities. For instance, visuoauditory cells have been reported in parietal areas LIP (=-=Linden, Grunewald, & Andersen, 1999-=-) and MIP (Cohen & Andersen, 1998), and visuo-tactile cells have been found in VIP (Duhamel, Colby, & Goldberg, 1998). Trimodal neurons responding to visual, tactile, and auditory stimuli have also be...

Latent variable models for neural data analysis. Doctoral dissertation,

by M Sahani , 1999
"... ..."
Abstract - Cited by 72 (7 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found

Is there a role of visual cortex in spatial hearing

by Ulrike Zimmer, Michael Erb, Wolfgang Grodd, Hans-otto Karnath - Eur. J. Neurosci
"... The integration of auditory and visual spatial information is an important prerequisite for accurate orientation in the environment. However, while visual spatial information is based on retinal coordinates, the auditory system receives information on sound location in relation to the head. Thus, an ..."
Abstract - Cited by 6 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
The integration of auditory and visual spatial information is an important prerequisite for accurate orientation in the environment. However, while visual spatial information is based on retinal coordinates, the auditory system receives information on sound location in relation to the head. Thus, any deviation of the eyes from a central position results in a divergence between the retinal visual and the head-centred auditory coordinates. It has been suggested that this divergence is compensated for by a neural coordinate transformation, using a signal of eye-in-head position. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated which cortical areas of the human brain participate in such auditory–visual coordinate transformations. Sounds were produced with different interaural level differences, leading to left, right or central intracranial percepts, while subjects directed their gaze to visual targets presented to the left, to the right or straight ahead. When gaze was to the left or right, we found the primary visual cortex (V1 ⁄V2) activated in both hemispheres. The occipital activation did not occur with sound lateralization per se, but was found exclusively in combination with eccentric eye positions. This result suggests a relation of neural processing in the visual cortex and the transformation of auditory spatial coordinates responsible for maintaining the perceptual alignment of audition and vision with changes in gaze direction.
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ell et al., 2001), temporal cortex (Benevento et al., 1977), frontal cortex (Vaadia et al., 1986; Kikuchi-Yorioka & Sawaguchi, 2000) and parietal cortex (Mazzoni et al., 1996; Grunewald et al., 1999; =-=Linden et al., 1999-=-; Cohen & Andersen, 2000). While visual spatial information is based on retinal coordinates, the auditory system derives information on sound location in relation to the head. Any deviation of the eye...

2005), “Interstimulus contingency facilitates saccadic responses in a bimodal go/no-go task

by Holle Kirchner , Hans Colonius - Cognitive Brain Research
"... Abstract The saccadic response to a suddenly appearing visual target stimulus is faster when an accessory auditory stimulus is presented in its spatiotemporal proximity. This multisensory facilitation of reaction time is usually considered a mandatory bottom -up process. Here, we report that it can ..."
Abstract - Cited by 2 (0 self) - Add to MetaCart
Abstract The saccadic response to a suddenly appearing visual target stimulus is faster when an accessory auditory stimulus is presented in its spatiotemporal proximity. This multisensory facilitation of reaction time is usually considered a mandatory bottom -up process. Here, we report that it can be modulated by the predictability of the target location provided by an accessory stimulus, thereby indicating a form of top -down processing. Subjects were asked to make a saccade in the direction of a visual target randomly appearing left or right from fixation. An accessory auditory stimulus was presented either at the same location or opposite to the target, with the probability varying over blocks of presentation. Thus, the auditory stimulus contained probabilistic information about the target location (interstimulus contingency). A certain percentage of the trials were catch trials in which the auditory accompanying stimulus (Experiment 1) or the visual target (Experiment 2) was presented alone and the subjects were asked to withhold their response. In particular with visual catch trials, varying the predictability of target location resulted in reaction time facilitation in the bimodal trials, with both high (80%) and low predictability (20%), but only when both stimuli were presented within a small time window (40 ms). As subjects could not possibly follow the task instructions in this short period explicitly, we conclude that they utilized the interstimulus contingency information implicitly, thus revealing an extremely fast involuntary top -down control on saccadic eye movements. D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Classification: Neural basis of behavior; Cognition Theme: Sensory systems Topic: Multisensory
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...esting to examine whether the interstimulus contingency effects found in the present study could be captured by assuming a non-constant interaction matrix in the model representing some kind of adaptation or learning process within the SC neurons [62]. But who tells the caudate and SNr what to expect? A possible cortical circuit in this framework are the frontal eye fields (FEF), the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of the posterior parietal cortex, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) which all are involved in the programming of voluntary, visually, and aurally guided eye movements [21,37,50]. These cortical structures are known to mediate the selection of the saccade target (FEF, [5]), the coding of the target location (LIP, [22]), and learning of stimulus– response associations (DLPFC, [3]). Single-cell activity in the FEF allows predicting the form of saccade latency distributions when used as parameter estimates of a simple accumulator model for the decision to initiate a saccade [24], while the neural activity in area LIP directly reflects the probability of saccade instruction [44]. Interestingly, both areas directly project onto the deep layers of the superior colliculus (S...

and

by Gemma A. Calvert, Thomas Thesen
"... integration: methodological approaches ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
integration: methodological approaches
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...s). [2,3,8,19,71,103] posterior portions of the STS, including the temporo-parietal association cortex (Tpt) [20,49] parietal cortex, including the ventral (VIP) and lateral (LIP) intraparietal areas =-=[7,51,52]-=-, and premotor and prefrontal cortex ([36,104]). Multisensory convergence zones have also been identified in sub-cortical structures, including the superior colliculus [31], the claustrum [74], the su...

3Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition

by Elisha P. Merriam, Christopher R. Genovese, Carol L. Colby, Department Of Neuroscience
"... of the eye movement command is thought to trigger remapping. Updating creates a stable representation of space by compensating for the displacement of objects on the retina. We hypothesized that spatial updating also occurs in humans. Behavioral results in humans and nonhuman primates have shown tha ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
of the eye movement command is thought to trigger remapping. Updating creates a stable representation of space by compensating for the displacement of objects on the retina. We hypothesized that spatial updating also occurs in humans. Behavioral results in humans and nonhuman primates have shown that they have similar abilities in double-step eye movement tasks that require the use of updated visual information (Baizer and Bender, 1989; Hallett and Lightstone, 1976). Moreover, the parietal lobe is critical for task performance. Humans with parietal lobe damage are unable to perform double-step tasks (Duhamel et al., 1992b; Heide et al., 1995), and parietal neurons in monkeys are specifically active in these tasks (Goldberg et al., 1990). We thus hypothesized that up-

Human Gaze Shifts to Acoustic and Visual Targets

by L. C. Populin, et al. , 2002
"... Eye and head contributions to orienting gaze shifts have been primarily studied using visual targets. Consequently, relatively little is known about the kinematics of eye and head movements in gaze shifts to acoustic targets. Although early work in nonhuman primates indicates that orienting response ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Eye and head contributions to orienting gaze shifts have been primarily studied using visual targets. Consequently, relatively little is known about the kinematics of eye and head movements in gaze shifts to acoustic targets. Although early work in nonhuman primates indicates that orienting responses to acoustic and visual targets are

Acta Psych

by unknown authors , 2010
"... is he ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Abstract not found
(Show Context)

Citation Context

...ulcus (Barraclough, Xiao, Baker, Oram, & Perrett, 2005; Benevento, Fallon, Davis, & Rezak, 1977; Bruce, Desimone, & Gross, 1981), the ventral and lateral intraparietal areas (Lewis & Van Essen, 2000; =-=Linden, Grunewald, & Andersen, 1999-=-), and sub-cortical areas like the superior colliculus (Meredith & Stein, 1996; Meredith et al., 1987;Wallace, Meredith, & Stein, 1998). Fig. 1 provides an anatomical overview of these areas. Note tha...

unknown title

by unknown authors
"... Understanding how the cerebral cortex processes in-formation is a major aim of neurobiology today, with im-portant implications for disciplines ranging from psy-chiatry to the designing of living machines. Numerous investigative techniques at different levels are used to this end, including function ..."
Abstract - Add to MetaCart
Understanding how the cerebral cortex processes in-formation is a major aim of neurobiology today, with im-portant implications for disciplines ranging from psy-chiatry to the designing of living machines. Numerous investigative techniques at different levels are used to this end, including functional brain imaging, single-unit recording, and anatomy. These techniques rapidly con-verge at the level of the cortical area, where specific physiological functions can be localized and each area exhibits distinct patterns of connectivity. The concerted action of multiple areas is thought to underlie sensory pro-cesses and cognitive functions. This has led to a major field of research that attempts to determine the position of individual areas in the overall cortical organization of in-formation flow. Work in the visual system has been par-
(Show Context)

Citation Context

... & Van Essen, 1991; Perkel, et al., 1986; Rockland, 1994). All these areas respond principally to visual and oculomotor stimuli, except for the LIP, where auditory-related activity has been reported (=-=Linden, Grunewald, & Andersen, 1999-=-). Jones and Powell (1970) have postulated that the connectivity of primary sensory areas is restricted to those areas of the same modality. The evidence in favor of multisensory convergence at the fi...

Powered by: Apache Solr
  • About CiteSeerX
  • Submit and Index Documents
  • Privacy Policy
  • Help
  • Data
  • Source
  • Contact Us

Developed at and hosted by The College of Information Sciences and Technology

© 2007-2019 The Pennsylvania State University