Results 1  10
of
63
An Analysis of FirstOrder Logics of Probability
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1990
"... : We consider two approaches to giving semantics to firstorder logics of probability. The first approach puts a probability on the domain, and is appropriate for giving semantics to formulas involving statistical information such as "The probability that a randomly chosen bird flies is greater than ..."
Abstract

Cited by 270 (18 self)
 Add to MetaCart
: We consider two approaches to giving semantics to firstorder logics of probability. The first approach puts a probability on the domain, and is appropriate for giving semantics to formulas involving statistical information such as "The probability that a randomly chosen bird flies is greater than .9." The second approach puts a probability on possible worlds, and is appropriate for giving semantics to formulas describing degrees of belief, such as "The probability that Tweety (a particular bird) flies is greater than .9." We show that the two approaches can be easily combined, allowing us to reason in a straightforward way about statistical information and degrees of belief. We then consider axiomatizing these logics. In general, it can be shown that no complete axiomatization is possible. We provide axiom systems that are sound and complete in cases where a complete axiomatization is possible, showing that they do allow us to capture a great deal of interesting reasoning about prob...
Adding structure to unstructured data
 In 6th Int. Conf. on Database Theory (ICDT ’97),LNCS 1186, 336–350
, 1997
"... We develop a new schema for unstructured data. Traditional schemas resemble the type systems of programming languages. For unstructured data, however, the underlying type may be much less constrained and hence an alternative way of expressing constraints on the data is needed. Here, we propose that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 204 (22 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop a new schema for unstructured data. Traditional schemas resemble the type systems of programming languages. For unstructured data, however, the underlying type may be much less constrained and hence an alternative way of expressing constraints on the data is needed. Here, we propose that both data and schema be represented as edgelabeled graphs. We develop notions of conformance between a graph database and a graph schema and show that there is a natural and e ciently computable ordering on graph schemas. We then examine certain subclasses of schemas and show that schemas are closed under query applications. Finally, we discuss how they may be used in query decomposition and optimization. 1
Tractable Reasoning via Approximation
 Artificial Intelligence
, 1995
"... Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantical ..."
Abstract

Cited by 92 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Problems in logic are wellknown to be hard to solve in the worst case. Two different strategies for dealing with this aspect are known from the literature: language restriction and theory approximation. In this paper we are concerned with the second strategy. Our main goal is to define a semantically wellfounded logic for approximate reasoning, which is justifiable from the intuitive point of view, and to provide fast algorithms for dealing with it even when using expressive languages. We also want our logic to be useful to perform approximate reasoning in different contexts. We define a method for the approximation of decision reasoning problems based on multivalued logics. Our work expands and generalizes in several directions ideas presented by other researchers. The major features of our technique are: 1) approximate answers give semantically clear information about the problem at hand; 2) approximate answers are easier to compute than answers to the original problem; 3) approxim...
Set Constraints are the Monadic Class
, 1992
"... We investigate the relationship between set constraints and the monadic class of firstorder formulas and show that set constraints are essentially equivalent to the monadic class. From this equivalence we can infer that the satisfiability problem for set constraints is complete for NEXPTIME. Mor ..."
Abstract

Cited by 69 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We investigate the relationship between set constraints and the monadic class of firstorder formulas and show that set constraints are essentially equivalent to the monadic class. From this equivalence we can infer that the satisfiability problem for set constraints is complete for NEXPTIME. More precisely, we prove that this problem has a lower bound of NTIME(c n= log n ). The relationship between set constraints and the monadic class also gives us decidability and complexity results for certain practically useful extensions of set constraints, in particular "negative projections" and subterm equality tests.
On the Decision Problem for TwoVariable FirstOrder Logic
, 1997
"... We identify the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for FO², the fragment of firstorder logic consisting of all relational firstorder sentences with at most two distinct variables. Although this fragment was shown to be decidable a long time ago, the computational complexity ..."
Abstract

Cited by 48 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We identify the computational complexity of the satisfiability problem for FO², the fragment of firstorder logic consisting of all relational firstorder sentences with at most two distinct variables. Although this fragment was shown to be decidable a long time ago, the computational complexity of its decision problem has not been pinpointed so far. In 1975 Mortimer proved that FO² has the finitemodel property, which means that if an FO²sentence is satisfiable, then it has a finite model. Moreover, Mortimer showed that every satisfiable FO²sentence has a model whose size is at most doubly exponential in the size of the sentence. In this paper, we improve Mortimer's bound by one exponential and show that every satisfiable FO²sentence has a model whose size is at most exponential in the size of the sentence. As a consequence, we establish that the satisfiability problem for FO² is NEXPTIMEcomplete.
Deciding Containment for Queries with Complex Objects and Aggregations
, 1997
"... We address the problem of query containment and query equivalence for complex objects. We show that for a certain conjunctive query language for complex objects, query containment and weak query equivalence are decidable. Our results have two consequences. First, when the answers of the two queries ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We address the problem of query containment and query equivalence for complex objects. We show that for a certain conjunctive query language for complex objects, query containment and weak query equivalence are decidable. Our results have two consequences. First, when the answers of the two queries are guaranteed not to contain empty sets, then weak equivalence coincides with equivalence, and our result answers partially an open problem about the equivalence of nest; unnest queries for complex objects [GPG90]. Second, we derive an NPcomplete algorithm for checking the equivalence of certain conjunctive queries with grouping and aggregates. Our results rely on a translation of the containment and equivalence conditions for complex objects into novel conditions on conjunctive queries, which we call simulation and strong simulation. These conditions are more complex than containment of conjunctive queries, because they involve arbitrary numbers of quantifier alternations. We prove that c...
Decidability and Expressiveness for FirstOrder Logics of Probability
 Information and Computation
, 1989
"... We consider decidability and expressiveness issues for two firstorder logics of probability. In one, the probability is on possible worlds, while in the other, it is on the domain. It turns out that in both cases it takes very little to make reasoning about probability highly undecidable. We show t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 40 (6 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider decidability and expressiveness issues for two firstorder logics of probability. In one, the probability is on possible worlds, while in the other, it is on the domain. It turns out that in both cases it takes very little to make reasoning about probability highly undecidable. We show that when the probability is on the domain, if the language contains only unary predicates then the validity problem is decidable. However, if the language contains even one binary predicate, the validity problem is \Pi 2 1 complete, as hard as elementary analysis with free predicate and function symbols. With equality in the language, even with no other symbol, the validity problem is at least as hard as that for elementary analysis, \Pi 1 1 hard. Thus, the logic cannot be axiomatized in either case. When we put the probability on the set of possible worlds, the validity problem is \Pi 2 1 complete with as little as one unary predicate in the language, even without equality. With equalit...
On the Classical Decision Problem
 Perspectives in Mathematical Logic
, 1993
"... this paper. In particular, their comments inspired and gave arguments for the discussion on the value of the classical decision problem after Church's and Turing's results. References ..."
Abstract

Cited by 36 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper. In particular, their comments inspired and gave arguments for the discussion on the value of the classical decision problem after Church's and Turing's results. References
Negative Set Constraints With Equality
 In Ninth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
, 1994
"... Systems of set constraints describe relations between sets of ground terms. They have been successfully used in program analysis and type inference. So far two proofs of decidability of mixed set constraints have been given: by R. Gilleron, S. Tison and M. Tommasi [12] and A. Aiken, D. Kozen, and E. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 33 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Systems of set constraints describe relations between sets of ground terms. They have been successfully used in program analysis and type inference. So far two proofs of decidability of mixed set constraints have been given: by R. Gilleron, S. Tison and M. Tommasi [12] and A. Aiken, D. Kozen, and E.L. Wimmers [3]. However, both these proofs are long, involved and do not seem to extend to more general set constraints. Our approach is based on a reduction of set constraints to the monadic class given in a recent paper by L. Bachmair, H. Ganzinger, and U. Waldmann [7]. We first give a new proof of decidability of systems of mixed positive and negative set constraints. We explicitely describe a very simple algorithm working in NEXPTIME and we give in all detail a relatively easy proof of its correctness. Then, we sketch how our technique can be applied to get various extensions of this result. In particular we prove that the problem of consistency of mixed set constraints with restricted p...