Results 1  10
of
70
WellStructured Transition Systems Everywhere!
 THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 1998
"... Wellstructured transition systems (WSTS's) are a general class of infinite state systems for which decidability results rely on the existence of a wellquasiordering between states that is compatible with the transitions. In this article, we provide an extensive treatment of the WSTS idea and show ..."
Abstract

Cited by 197 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Wellstructured transition systems (WSTS's) are a general class of infinite state systems for which decidability results rely on the existence of a wellquasiordering between states that is compatible with the transitions. In this article, we provide an extensive treatment of the WSTS idea and show several new results. Our improved definitions allow many examples of classical systems to be seen as instances of WSTS's.
Bisimulation Equivalence is Decidable for all ContextFree Processes
 Information and Computation
, 1995
"... Introduction Over the past decade much attention has been devoted to the study of process calculi such as CCS, ACP and CSP [13]. Of particular interest has been the study of the behavioural semantics of these calculi as given by labelled transition graphs. One important question is when processes c ..."
Abstract

Cited by 92 (15 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Introduction Over the past decade much attention has been devoted to the study of process calculi such as CCS, ACP and CSP [13]. Of particular interest has been the study of the behavioural semantics of these calculi as given by labelled transition graphs. One important question is when processes can be said to exhibit the same behaviour, and a plethora of behavioural equivalences exists today. Their main rationale has been to capture behavioural aspects that language or trace equivalences do not take into account. The theory of finitestate systems and their equivalences can now be said to be wellestablished. There are many automatic verification tools for their analysis which incorporate equivalence checking. Sound and complete equational theories exist for the various known equivalences, an elegant example is [18]. One may be led to wonder what the results will look like for infinitestate systems. Although language equivalence is decidable
Model Checking for ContextFree Processes
, 1992
"... We develop a modelchecking algorithm that decides for a given contextfree process whether it satisfies a property written in the alternationfree modal mucalculus. The central idea behind this algorithm is to raise the standard iterative modelchecking techniques to higher order: in contrast to t ..."
Abstract

Cited by 78 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We develop a modelchecking algorithm that decides for a given contextfree process whether it satisfies a property written in the alternationfree modal mucalculus. The central idea behind this algorithm is to raise the standard iterative modelchecking techniques to higher order: in contrast to the usual approaches, in which the set of formulas that are satisfied by a certain state are iteratively computed, our algorithm iteratively computes a property transformer for each state class of the finite process representation. These property transformers can then simply be applied to solve the modelchecking problem. The complexity of our algorithm is linear in the size of the system's representation and exponential in the size of the property being investigated.
Modal and Temporal Logics for Processes
, 1996
"... this paper have been presented at the 4th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, University of Essex, 1992; at the Tempus Summer School for Algebraic and Categorical Methods in Computer Science, Masaryk University, Brno, 1993; and the Summer School in Logic Methods in Concurrency ..."
Abstract

Cited by 71 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper have been presented at the 4th European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information, University of Essex, 1992; at the Tempus Summer School for Algebraic and Categorical Methods in Computer Science, Masaryk University, Brno, 1993; and the Summer School in Logic Methods in Concurrency, Aarhus University, 1993. I would like to thank the organisers and the participants of these summer schools, and of the Banff higher order workshop. I would also like to thank Julian Bradfield for use of his Tex tree constructor for building derivation trees and Carron Kirkwood, Faron Moller, Perdita Stevens and David Walker for comments on earlier drafts.
Verification on Infinite Structures
, 2000
"... In this chapter, we present a hierarchy of infinitestate systems based on the primitive operations of sequential and parallel composition; the hierarchy includes a variety of commonlystudied classes of systems such as contextfree and pushdown automata, and Petri net processes. We then examine the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 69 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In this chapter, we present a hierarchy of infinitestate systems based on the primitive operations of sequential and parallel composition; the hierarchy includes a variety of commonlystudied classes of systems such as contextfree and pushdown automata, and Petri net processes. We then examine the equivalence and regularity checking problems for these classes, with special emphasis on bisimulation equivalence, stressing the structural techniques which have been devised for solving these problems. Finally, we explore the model checking problem over these classes with respect to various linear and branchingtime temporal logics.
An Automatatheoretic Approach to Interprocedural Dataflow Analysis
, 1999
"... . We show that recent progress in extending the automatatheoretic approach to modelchecking beyond the class of finitestate processes finds a natural application in the area of interprocedural dataflow analysis. Keywords: Interprocedural dataflow analysis, modelchecking, automata theory, progra ..."
Abstract

Cited by 53 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
. We show that recent progress in extending the automatatheoretic approach to modelchecking beyond the class of finitestate processes finds a natural application in the area of interprocedural dataflow analysis. Keywords: Interprocedural dataflow analysis, modelchecking, automata theory, program optimisation. 1 Introduction Recent work [15, 24] has shown that modelchecking algorithms for abstract classes of infinitestate systems, like contextfree processes [1, 5] and pushdown processes [6], find a natural application in the area of dataflow analysis (DFA) for programming languages with procedures [16], usually called interprocedural DFA. A large variety of DFA problems, whose solution is required by optimising compilers in order to apply performance improving transformations, can be solved by means of a unique modelchecking technique. The techniques of [5, 6] are based on what could be called the fixpoint approach to modelchecking [24], in which the set of states satisfying...
Actions Speak Louder than Words: Proving Bisimilarity for ContextFree Processes
, 1991
"... Baeten, Bergstra, and Klop (and later Caucal) have proved the remarkable result that bisimulation equivalence is decidable for irredundant contextfree grammars. In this paper we provide a much simpler and much more direct proof of this result using a tableau decision method involving goaldirec ..."
Abstract

Cited by 45 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Baeten, Bergstra, and Klop (and later Caucal) have proved the remarkable result that bisimulation equivalence is decidable for irredundant contextfree grammars. In this paper we provide a much simpler and much more direct proof of this result using a tableau decision method involving goaldirected rules. The decision procedure also provides the essential part of the bisimulation relation between two processes which underlies their equivalence. We also show how to obtain a sound and complete sequentbased equational theory for such processes from the tableau system and how one can extract what Caucal calls a fundamental relation from a successful tableau.
Deciding BisimulationLike Equivalences with FiniteState Processes
, 1999
"... We show that characteristic formulae for nitestate systems up to bisimulationlike equivalences (e.g., strong and weak bisimilarity) can be given in the simple branchingtime temporal logic EF. Since EF is a very weak fragment of the modal µcalculus, model checking with EF is decidable for many mo ..."
Abstract

Cited by 41 (14 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show that characteristic formulae for nitestate systems up to bisimulationlike equivalences (e.g., strong and weak bisimilarity) can be given in the simple branchingtime temporal logic EF. Since EF is a very weak fragment of the modal µcalculus, model checking with EF is decidable for many more classes of infinitestate systems. This yields a general method for proving decidability of bisimulationlike equivalences between infinitestate processes and finitestate ones. We apply this method to the class of PAD processes, which strictly subsumes PA and pushdown (PDA) processes, showing that a large class of bisimulationlike equivalences (including, e.g., strong and weak bisimilarity) is decidable between PAD and finitestate processes. On the other hand, we also demonstrate that no `reasonable' bisimulationlike equivalence is decidable between stateextended PA processes and finitestate ones. Furthermore, weak bisimilarity with finitestate processes is shown to be undecidable even for state...