Results 1  10
of
44
Programming Parallel Algorithms
, 1996
"... In the past 20 years there has been treftlendous progress in developing and analyzing parallel algorithftls. Researchers have developed efficient parallel algorithms to solve most problems for which efficient sequential solutions are known. Although some ofthese algorithms are efficient only in a th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 193 (9 self)
 Add to MetaCart
In the past 20 years there has been treftlendous progress in developing and analyzing parallel algorithftls. Researchers have developed efficient parallel algorithms to solve most problems for which efficient sequential solutions are known. Although some ofthese algorithms are efficient only in a theoretical framework, many are quite efficient in practice or have key ideas that have been used in efficient implementations. This research on parallel algorithms has not only improved our general understanding ofparallelism but in several cases has led to improvements in sequential algorithms. Unf:ortunately there has been less success in developing good languages f:or prograftlftling parallel algorithftls, particularly languages that are well suited for teaching and prototyping algorithms. There has been a large gap between languages
The String Edit Distance Matching Problems with Moves
, 2006
"... The edit distance between two strings S and R is defined to be the minimum number of character inserts, deletes and changes needed to convert R to S. Given a text string t of length n, and a pattern string p of length m, informally, the string edit distance matching problem is to compute the smalles ..."
Abstract

Cited by 59 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The edit distance between two strings S and R is defined to be the minimum number of character inserts, deletes and changes needed to convert R to S. Given a text string t of length n, and a pattern string p of length m, informally, the string edit distance matching problem is to compute the smallest edit distance between p and substrings of t. We relax the problem so that (a) we allow an additional operation, namely, substring moves, and (b) we allow approximation of this string edit distance. Our result is a near linear time deterministic algorithm to produce a factor of O(log n log ∗ n) approximation to the string edit distance with moves. This is the first known significantly subquadratic algorithm for a string edit distance problem in which the distance involves nontrivial alignments. Our results are obtained by embedding strings into L1 vector space using a simplified parsing technique we call Edit
Planar Separators and Parallel Polygon Triangulation
"... We show how to construct an O ( p n)separator decomposition of a planar graph G in O(n) time. Such a decomposition defines a binary tree where each node corresponds to a subgraph of G and stores an O ( p n)separator of that subgraph. We also show how to construct an O(n)way decomposition tree in ..."
Abstract

Cited by 52 (8 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We show how to construct an O ( p n)separator decomposition of a planar graph G in O(n) time. Such a decomposition defines a binary tree where each node corresponds to a subgraph of G and stores an O ( p n)separator of that subgraph. We also show how to construct an O(n)way decomposition tree in parallel in O(log n) time so that each node corresponds to a subgraph of G and stores an O(n 1=2+)separator of that subgraph. We demonstrate the utility of such a separator decomposition by showing how it can be used in the design of a parallel algorithm for triangulating a simple polygon deterministically in O(log n) time using O(n = log n) processors on a CRCW PRAM.
Parallel Algorithms with Optimal Speedup for Bounded Treewidth
 Proceedings 22nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming
, 1995
"... We describe the first parallel algorithm with optimal speedup for constructing minimumwidth tree decompositions of graphs of bounded treewidth. On nvertex input graphs, the algorithm works in O((logn)^2) time using O(n) operations on the EREW PRAM. We also give faster parallel algorithms with opti ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (10 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe the first parallel algorithm with optimal speedup for constructing minimumwidth tree decompositions of graphs of bounded treewidth. On nvertex input graphs, the algorithm works in O((logn)^2) time using O(n) operations on the EREW PRAM. We also give faster parallel algorithms with optimal speedup for the problem of deciding whether the treewidth of an input graph is bounded by a given constant and for a variety of problems on graphs of bounded treewidth, including all decision problems expressible in monadic secondorder logic. On nvertex input graphs, the algorithms use O(n) operations together with O(log n log n) time on the EREW PRAM, or O(log n) time on the CRCW PRAM.
A Parallel Algorithm for Computing Minimum Spanning Trees
, 1992
"... We present a simple and implementable algorithm that computes a minimum spanning tree of an undirected weighted graph G = (V, E) of n = V vertices and m = E edges on an EREW PRAM in O(log 3=2 n) time using n+m processors. This represents a substantial improvement in the running time over the ..."
Abstract

Cited by 30 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We present a simple and implementable algorithm that computes a minimum spanning tree of an undirected weighted graph G = (V, E) of n = V vertices and m = E edges on an EREW PRAM in O(log 3=2 n) time using n+m processors. This represents a substantial improvement in the running time over the previous results for this problem using at the same time the weakest of the PRAM models. It also implies the existence of algorithms having the same complexity bounds for the EREW PRAM, for connectivity, ear decomposition, biconnectivity, strong orientation, stnumbering and Euler tours problems.
Parallel Algorithmic Techniques for Combinatorial Computation
 Ann. Rev. Comput. Sci
, 1988
"... this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165. ..."
Abstract

Cited by 29 (3 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper and supplied many helpful comments. This research was supported in part by NSF grants DCR8511713, CCR8605353, and CCR8814977, and by DARPA contract N0003984C0165.
Parallel transitive closure and point location in planar structures
 SIAM J. COMPUT
, 1991
"... Parallel algorithms for several graph and geometric problems are presented, including transitive closure and topological sorting in planar stgraphs, preprocessing planar subdivisions for point location queries, and construction of visibility representations and drawings of planar graphs. Most of th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 23 (11 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Parallel algorithms for several graph and geometric problems are presented, including transitive closure and topological sorting in planar stgraphs, preprocessing planar subdivisions for point location queries, and construction of visibility representations and drawings of planar graphs. Most of these algorithms achieve optimal O(log n) running time using n = log n processors in the EREW PRAM model, n being the number of vertices.
Randomized Parallel Algorithms For Trapezoidal Diagrams
, 1992
"... We describe randomized parallel algorithms for building trapezoidal diagrams of line segments in the plane. The algorithms are designed for a CRCW PRAM. For general segments, we give an algorithm requiring optimal O(A + n log n) expected work and optimal O(logn) time, where A is the number of inters ..."
Abstract

Cited by 22 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We describe randomized parallel algorithms for building trapezoidal diagrams of line segments in the plane. The algorithms are designed for a CRCW PRAM. For general segments, we give an algorithm requiring optimal O(A + n log n) expected work and optimal O(logn) time, where A is the number of intersecting pairs of segments. If the segments form a simple chain, we give an algorithm requiring optimal O(n) expected work and O(logn log log n log n) expected time a , and a simpler algorithm requiring O(n log n) expected work. The serial algorithm corresponding to the latter is among the simplest known algorithms requiring O(n log n) expected operations. For a set of segments forming K chains, we give an algorithm requiring O(A + n log n + K log n) expected work and O(logn log log n log n) expected time. The parallel time bounds require the assumption that enough processors are available, with processor allocations every log n steps. Keywords: randomized, parallel, trapez...