this paper we describe a statically typed XML processing language called XDuce (o#cially pronounced "transduce"). XDuce is a functional language whose primitive data structures represent XML documents and whose types---called regular expression types---correspond to document schemas. The motivating principle behind its design is that a simple, clean, and powerful type system for XML processing can be based directly on the theory of regular tree automata

We consider the problem of specifying and verifying cryptographic security protocols for XML web services. The security specification WS-Security describes a range of XML security tokens, such as username tokens, public-key certificates, and digital signature blocks, amounting to a flexible vocabulary for expressing protocols. To describe the syntax of these tokens, we extend the usual XML data model with symbolic representations of cryptographic values. We use predicates on this data model to describe the semantics of security tokens and of sample protocols distributed with the Microsoft WSE implementation of WS-Security. By embedding our data model within Abadi and Fournet’s applied pi calculus, we formulate and prove security properties with respect to the standard Dolev-Yao threat model. Moreover, we informally discuss issues not addressed by the formal model. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first approach to the specification and verification of security protocols based on a faithful account of the XML wire format.

This paper proposes extending popular object-oriented programming languages such as C#, VB or Java with native support for XML. In our approach XML documents or document fragments become first class citizens. This means that XML values can be constructed, loaded, passed, transformed and updated in a type-safe manner. The type system extensions, however, are not based on XML Schemas. We show that XSDs and the XML data model do not fit well with the class-based nominal type system and object graph representation of our target languages. Instead we propose to extend the C # type system with new structural types that model XSD sequences, choices, and all-groups. We also propose a number of extensions to the language itself that incorporate a simple but expressive query language that is influenced by XPath and SQL. We demonstrate our language and type system by translating a selection of the XQuery use cases.

This paper presents our compilation strategy to produce efficient code for pattern matching in the CDuce compiler, taking into account static information provided by the type system. Indeed, this information allows in many cases to compute the result (that is, to decide which branch to consider) by looking only at a small fragment of the tree. Formally, we introduce a new kind of deterministic tree automata that can efficiently recognize regular tree languages with static information about the trees and we propose a compilation algorithm to produce these automata.

On an abstract level, XML Schema increases the limited expressive power of Document Type Definitions (DTDs) by extending them with a recursive typing mechanism. However, an investigation of the XML Schema Definitions (XSDs) occurring in practice reveals that the vast majority of them are structurally equivalent to DTDs. This might be due to the complexity of the XML Schema specification and the difficulty to understand the effect of constraints on typing and validation of schemas. To shed some light on the actual expressive power of XSDs this paper studies the impact of the Element Declarations Consistent (EDC) and the Unique Particle Attribution (UPA) rule. An equivalent formalism based on contextual patterns rather than on recursive types is proposed which might serve as a light-weight front end for XML Schema. Finally, the effect of EDC and UPA on the way XML documents can be typed is discussed. It is argued that a cleaner, more robust, stronger but equally efficient class is obtained by replacing these constraints with the notion of 1-pass preorder typing: schemas that allow to determine the type of an element of a streaming document when its opening tag is met. This notion can be defined in terms of restrained competition regular expressions and there is again an equivalent syntactical formalism based on contextual patterns. 1.

A generic program is written once and works on values of many data types. Generic Haskell is a recent extension of the functional programming language Haskell that supports generic programming. This paper discusses how Generic Haskell can be used to implement XML tools whose behaviour depends on the DTD or Schema of the input XML document. Example tools include XML editors, databases, and compressors. Generic Haskell is ideally suited for implementing XML tools: .

... In this chapter, we shall see that the suspicion is easy dispelled. We look at techniques now used in practice for dealing with XML trees, and we note how they depart from old-fashioned uses. Since trees are objects that are very complicated to manipulate directly through pointer updates, declarative techniques are becoming increasingly important, especially when it comes to exploring, mining, and constructing tree-shaped data. In particular, we will contrast conventional concepts of database theory such as relational calculus with that of more procedural notations for trees. We explore why the essential problem of locating data in trees is intimately linked with tree automata and decidable logics, somewhat in parallel to the link between query algebras and first-order logic in relational database theory. So, we shall see why logic and automata create interesting new research opportunities.

An XML data binding is a translation of XML documents into values of some programming language. This paper discusses a type-preserving XML-Haskell data binding that handles documents typed by the W3C XML Schema standard. Our translation is based on a formal semantics of Schema, and has been proved sound with respect to the semantics. We also show a program in Generic Haskell that constructs parsers specialized to a particular Schema type.

Datatypes which di#er inessentially in their names and structure are said to be isomorphic; for example, a ternary product is isomorphic to a nested pair of binary products. In some canonical cases, the conversion function is uniquely determined solely by the two types involved.

We study a first-order functional language with the novel combination of the ideas of refinement type (the subset of a type to satisfy a Boolean expression) and type-test (a Boolean expression testing whether a value belongs to a type). Our core calculus can express a rich variety of typing idioms; for example, intersection, union, negation, singleton, nullable, variant, and algebraic types are all derivable. We formulate a semantics in which expressions denote terms, and types are interpreted as first-order logic formulas. Subtyping is defined as valid implication between the semantics of types. The formulas are interpreted in a specific model that we axiomatize using standard first-order theories. On this basis, we present a novel type-checking algorithm able to eliminate many dynamic tests and to detect many errors statically. The key idea is to rely on an SMT solver to compute subtyping efficiently. Moreover, interpreting types as formulas allows us to call the SMT solver at run-time to compute instances of types.