Results 1 - 10
of
39
Detecting spam web pages through content analysis
- In Proceedings of the World Wide Web conference
, 2006
"... In this paper, we continue our investigations of “web spam”: the injection of artificially-created pages into the web in order to influence the results from search engines, to drive traffic to certain pages for fun or profit. This paper considers some previously-undescribed techniques for automatica ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 110 (3 self)
- Add to MetaCart
In this paper, we continue our investigations of “web spam”: the injection of artificially-created pages into the web in order to influence the results from search engines, to drive traffic to certain pages for fun or profit. This paper considers some previously-undescribed techniques for automatically detecting spam pages, examines the effectiveness of these techniques in isolation and when aggregated using classification algorithms. When combined, our heuristics correctly identify 2,037 (86.2%) of the 2,364 spam pages (13.8%) in our judged collection of 17,168 pages, while misidentifying 526 spam and non-spam pages (3.1%).
Know your neighbors: Web spam detection using the web topology
- In Proceedings of SIGIR
, 2007
"... Web spam can significantly deteriorate the quality of search engine results. Thus there is a large incentive for commercial search engines to detect spam pages efficiently and accurately. In this paper we present a spam detection system that uses the topology of the Web graph by exploiting the link ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 43 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Web spam can significantly deteriorate the quality of search engine results. Thus there is a large incentive for commercial search engines to detect spam pages efficiently and accurately. In this paper we present a spam detection system that uses the topology of the Web graph by exploiting the link dependencies among the Web pages, and the content of the pages themselves. We find that linked hosts tend to belong to the same class: either both are spam or both are non-spam. We demonstrate three methods of incorporating the Web graph topology into the predictions obtained by our base classifier: (i) clustering the host graph, and assigning the label of all hosts in the cluster by majority vote, (ii) propagating the predicted labels to neighboring hosts, and (iii) using the predicted labels of neighboring hosts as new features and retraining the classifier. The result is an accurate system for detecting Web spam that can be applied in practice to large-scale Web data.
Link-Based Characterization and Detection of Web Spam
- In AIRWeb
, 2006
"... We perform a statistical analysis of a large collection of Web pages, focusing on spam detection. We study several metrics such as degree correlations, number of neighbors, rank propagation through links, TrustRank and others to build several automatic web spam classifiers. This paper presents a stu ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 38 (8 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We perform a statistical analysis of a large collection of Web pages, focusing on spam detection. We study several metrics such as degree correlations, number of neighbors, rank propagation through links, TrustRank and others to build several automatic web spam classifiers. This paper presents a study of the performance of each of these classifiers alone, as well as their combined performance. Using this approach we are able to detect 80.4% of the Web spam in our sample, with only 1.1% of false positives.
A reference collection for Web spam
- SIGIR Forum
, 2006
"... We describe the WEBSPAM-UK2006 collection, a large set of Web pages that have been manually annotated with labels indicating if the hosts are include Web spam aspects or not. This is the first publicly available Web spam collection that includes page contents and links, and that has been labelled by ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 36 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
We describe the WEBSPAM-UK2006 collection, a large set of Web pages that have been manually annotated with labels indicating if the hosts are include Web spam aspects or not. This is the first publicly available Web spam collection that includes page contents and links, and that has been labelled by a large and diverse set of judges. 1
Spam double-funnel: connecting web spammers with advertisers
- In WWW
, 2007
"... Spammers use questionable search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to promote their spam links into top search results. In this paper, we focus on one prevalent type of spam – redirection spam – where one can identify spam pages by the third-party domains that these pages redirect traffic to. We ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 28 (0 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Spammers use questionable search engine optimization (SEO) techniques to promote their spam links into top search results. In this paper, we focus on one prevalent type of spam – redirection spam – where one can identify spam pages by the third-party domains that these pages redirect traffic to. We propose a fivelayer, double-funnel model for describing end-to-end redirection spam, present a methodology for analyzing the layers, and identify prominent domains on each layer using two sets of commercial keywords – one targeting spammers and the other targeting advertisers. The methodology and findings are useful for search engines to strengthen their ranking algorithms against spam, for legitimate website owners to locate and remove spam doorway pages, and for legitimate advertisers to identify unscrupulous syndicators who serve ads on spam pages.
Topical TrustRank: using topicality to combat web spam
, 2006
"... Web spam is behavior that attempts to deceive search engine ranking algorithms. TrustRank is a recent algorithm that can combat web spam. However, TrustRank is vulnerable in the sense that the seed set used by TrustRank may not be sufficiently representative to cover well the different topics on the ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 27 (6 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Web spam is behavior that attempts to deceive search engine ranking algorithms. TrustRank is a recent algorithm that can combat web spam. However, TrustRank is vulnerable in the sense that the seed set used by TrustRank may not be sufficiently representative to cover well the different topics on the Web. Also, for a given seed set, TrustRank has a bias towards larger communities. We propose the use of topical information to partition the seed set and calculate trust scores for each topic separately to address the above issues. A combination of these trust scores for a page is used to determine its ranking. Experimental results on two large datasets show that our Topical TrustRank has a better performance than TrustRank in demoting spam sites or pages. Compared to TrustRank, our best technique can decrease spam from the top ranked sites by as much as 43.1%.
Using Rank Propagation and Probabilistic Counting for Link-Based Spam Detection
- In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis (WebKDD
, 2006
"... This paper describes a technique for automating the detection of Web link spam, that is, groups of pages that are linked together with the sole purpose of obtaining an undeservedly high score in search engines. The problem of Web spam is widespread and di#cult to solve, mostly due to the large size ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 26 (12 self)
- Add to MetaCart
This paper describes a technique for automating the detection of Web link spam, that is, groups of pages that are linked together with the sole purpose of obtaining an undeservedly high score in search engines. The problem of Web spam is widespread and di#cult to solve, mostly due to the large size of web collections that makes many algorithms unfeasible in practice.
Propagating Trust and Distrust to Demote Web Spam
, 2006
"... Web spamming describes behavior that attempts to deceive search engine's ranking algorithms. TrustRank is a recent algorithm that can combat web spam by propagating trust among web pages. However, TrustRank propagates trust among web pages based on the number of outgoing links, which is also how Pag ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 22 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Web spamming describes behavior that attempts to deceive search engine's ranking algorithms. TrustRank is a recent algorithm that can combat web spam by propagating trust among web pages. However, TrustRank propagates trust among web pages based on the number of outgoing links, which is also how PageRank propagates authority scores among Web pages. This type of propagation may be suited for propagating authority, but it is not optimal for calculating trust scores for demoting spam sites. In this paper,
Link spam detection based on mass estimation
- In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Very Large Databases. ACM
, 2006
"... Link spamming intends to mislead search engines and trigger an artificially high link-based ranking of specific target web pages. This paper introduces the concept of spam mass, a measure of the impact of link spamming on a page’s ranking. We discuss how to estimate spam mass and how the estimates c ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 21 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Link spamming intends to mislead search engines and trigger an artificially high link-based ranking of specific target web pages. This paper introduces the concept of spam mass, a measure of the impact of link spamming on a page’s ranking. We discuss how to estimate spam mass and how the estimates can help identifying pages that benefit significantly from link spamming. In our experiments on the host-level Yahoo! web graph we use spam mass estimates to successfully identify tens of thousands of instances of heavy-weight link spamming. 1.
A Quantitative Study of Forum Spamming Using Contextbased Analysis
- In Proc. Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS) Symposium
, 2007
"... Forum spamming has become a major means of search engine spamming. To evaluate the impact of forum spamming on search quality, we have conducted a comprehensive study from three perspectives: that of the search user, the spammer, and the forum hosting site. We examine spam blogs and spam comments in ..."
Abstract
-
Cited by 18 (2 self)
- Add to MetaCart
Forum spamming has become a major means of search engine spamming. To evaluate the impact of forum spamming on search quality, we have conducted a comprehensive study from three perspectives: that of the search user, the spammer, and the forum hosting site. We examine spam blogs and spam comments in both legitimate and honey forums. Our study shows that forum spamming is a widespread problem. Spammed forums, powered by the most popular software, show up in the top 20 search results for all the 189 popular keywords. On two blog sites, more than half (75 % and 54 % respectively) of the blogs are spam, and even on a major and reputably well maintained blog site, 8.1 % of the blogs are spam 1. The observation on our honey forums confirms that spammers target abandoned pages and that most comment spam is meant to increase page rank rather than generate immediate traffic. We propose contextbased analyses, consisting of redirection and cloaking analysis, to detect spam automatically and to overcome shortcomings of content-based analyses. Our study shows that these analyses are very effective in identifying spam pages. 1

