Results 1  10
of
31
Process algebra for synchronous communication
 Inform. and Control
, 1984
"... Within the context of an algebraic theory of processes, an equational specification of process cooperation is provided. Four cases are considered: free merge or interleaving, merging with communication, merging with mutual exclusion of tight regions, and synchronous process cooperation. The rewrite ..."
Abstract

Cited by 360 (51 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Within the context of an algebraic theory of processes, an equational specification of process cooperation is provided. Four cases are considered: free merge or interleaving, merging with communication, merging with mutual exclusion of tight regions, and synchronous process cooperation. The rewrite system behind the communication algebra is shown to be confluent and terminating (modulo its permutative reductions). Further, some relationships are shown to hold between the four concepts of merging. © 1984 Academic Press, Inc.
Modeling Concurrency with Geometry
"... The phenomena of branching time and true or noninterleaving concurrency find their respective homes in automata and schedules. But these two models of computation are formally equivalent via Birkhoff duality, an equivalence we expound on here in tutorial detail. So why should these phenomena prefer ..."
Abstract

Cited by 124 (13 self)
 Add to MetaCart
The phenomena of branching time and true or noninterleaving concurrency find their respective homes in automata and schedules. But these two models of computation are formally equivalent via Birkhoff duality, an equivalence we expound on here in tutorial detail. So why should these phenomena prefer one home over the other? We identify dimension as the culprit: 1dimensional automata are skeletons permitting only interleaving concurrency, whereas true nfold concurrency resides in transitions of dimension n. The truly concurrent automaton dual to a schedule is not a skeletal distributive lattice but a solid one. We introduce true nondeterminism and define it as monoidal homotopy; from this perspective nondeterminism in ordinary automata arises from forking and joining creating nontrivial homotopy. The automaton dual to a poset schedule is simply connected whereas that dual to an event structure schedule need not be, according to monoidal homotopy though not to group homotopy. We conclude with a formal definition of higher dimensional automaton as an ncomplex or ncategory, whose two essential axioms are associativity of concatenation within dimension and an interchange principle between dimensions.
Modelling Knowledge and Action in Distributed Systems
 Distributed Computing
, 1988
"... : We present a formal model that captures the subtle interaction between knowledge and action in distributed systems. We view a distributed system as a set of runs, where a run is a function from time to global states and a global state is a tuple consisting of an environment state and a local state ..."
Abstract

Cited by 85 (28 self)
 Add to MetaCart
: We present a formal model that captures the subtle interaction between knowledge and action in distributed systems. We view a distributed system as a set of runs, where a run is a function from time to global states and a global state is a tuple consisting of an environment state and a local state for each process in the system. This model is a generalization of those used in many previous papers. Actions in this model are associated with functions from global states to global states. A protocol is a function from local states to actions. We extend the standard notion of a protocol by defining knowledgebased protocols, ones in which a process' actions may depend explicitly on its knowledge. Knowledgebased protocols provide a natural way of describing how actions should take place in a distributed system. Finally, we show how the notion of one protocol implementing another can be captured in our model. Some material in this paper appeared in preliminary form in [HF85]. An abridge...
A ContourBased Approach to Multisensor Image Registration
 IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
, 1995
"... Image registration is concerned with the establishment of correspondence between images of the same scene. One challenging problem in this area is the registration of multispectral/multisensor images. In general, such images have different gray level characteristics, and simple techniques such as th ..."
Abstract

Cited by 64 (1 self)
 Add to MetaCart
Image registration is concerned with the establishment of correspondence between images of the same scene. One challenging problem in this area is the registration of multispectral/multisensor images. In general, such images have different gray level characteristics, and simple techniques such as those based on area correlations cannot be applied directly. On the other hand, contours representing region boundaries are preserved in most cases. In this paper, we present two contourbased methods which use region boundaries and other strong edges as matching primitives. The first contour matching algorithm is based on the chain.code correlation and other shape similarity criteria such as invariant moments. Closed contours and the salient segments along the open contours are matched separately. This method works well for image pairs in which the contour information is well preserved, such as the optical images from Landsat and Spot satellites. For the registration of the optical images with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images, we propose an elastic contour matching scheme based on the active contour model. Using the contours from the optical image as the initial condition, accurate contour locations in the SAR image are obtained by applying the active contour model. Both contour matching methods are automatic and computationally quite efficient. Experimental results with various kinds of image data have verified the robustness of our algorithms, which have outperformed manual registration in terms of root mean square error at the control points.
Concurrent Transition Systems
 Theoretical Computer Science
, 1989
"... : Concurrent transition systems (CTS's), are ordinary nondeterministic transition systems that have been equipped with additional concurrency information, specified in terms of a binary residual operation on transitions. Each CTS C freely generates a complete CTS or computation category C , whose ..."
Abstract

Cited by 40 (5 self)
 Add to MetaCart
: Concurrent transition systems (CTS's), are ordinary nondeterministic transition systems that have been equipped with additional concurrency information, specified in terms of a binary residual operation on transitions. Each CTS C freely generates a complete CTS or computation category C , whose arrows are equivalence classes of finite computation sequences, modulo a congruence induced by the concurrency information. The categorical composition on C induces a "prefix" partial order on its arrows, and the computations of C are conveniently defined to be the ideals of this partial order. The definition of computations as ideals has some pleasant properties, one of which is that the notion of a maximal ideal in certain circumstances can serve as a replacement for the more troublesome notion of a fair computation sequence. To illustrate the utility of CTS's, we use them to define and investigate a dataflowlike model of concurrent computation. The model consists of machines, which ...
Gates accept concurrent behavior
 In Proc. 34th Ann. IEEE Symp. on Foundations of Comp. Sci
, 1993
"... We represent concurrent processes as Boolean propositions or gates, cast in the role of acceptors of concurrent behavior. This properly extends other mainstream representations of concurrent behavior such as event structures, yet is defined more simply. It admits an intrinsic notion of duality that ..."
Abstract

Cited by 32 (16 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We represent concurrent processes as Boolean propositions or gates, cast in the role of acceptors of concurrent behavior. This properly extends other mainstream representations of concurrent behavior such as event structures, yet is defined more simply. It admits an intrinsic notion of duality that permits processes to be viewed as either schedules or automata. Its algebraic structure is essentially that of linear logic, with its morphisms being consequencepreserving renamings of propositions, and with its operations forming the core of a natural concurrent programming language. 1
Higher Dimensional Automata Revisited
 MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE
, 2000
"... ..."
Foundations of a Theory of Specification for Distributed Systems
, 1984
"... This thesis investigates a particular approach, called statetransition specification, to the problem of describing the behavior of modules in a distributed or concurrent computer ,stem. A statetransition specification consists off (1) a state machine, which incorporates the safety or invariance pr ..."
Abstract

Cited by 13 (2 self)
 Add to MetaCart
This thesis investigates a particular approach, called statetransition specification, to the problem of describing the behavior of modules in a distributed or concurrent computer ,stem. A statetransition specification consists off (1) a state machine, which incorporates the safety or invariance properties of the module, and (2) validity conditions on the computations of the machine, which'capture the desired liveness or eventu;lity properties. The theory and techniques of state. transition specification are developed'from first principles to a point at which it is possible to write example sPeCificatiOns,'to checkthe Specifications for coraiatency, and to perform correctlse examples.
Concurrent Kripke Structures
 In Proceedings of the North American Process Algebra Workshop, Cornell CSTR931369
, 1993
"... We consider a class of Kripke Structures in which the atomic propositions are events. This enables us to represent worlds as sets of events and the transition and satisfaction relations of Kripke structures as the subset and membership relations on sets. We use this class, called event Kripke struct ..."
Abstract

Cited by 10 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
We consider a class of Kripke Structures in which the atomic propositions are events. This enables us to represent worlds as sets of events and the transition and satisfaction relations of Kripke structures as the subset and membership relations on sets. We use this class, called event Kripke structures, to model concurrency. The obvious semantics for these structures is a true concurrency semantics. We show how several aspects of concurrency can be easily defined, and in addition get distinctions between causality and enabling, and choice and nondeterminism. We define a duality for event Kripke structures, and show how this duality enables us to convert between imperative and declarative views of programs, by treating states and events on the same footing. We provide pictorial representations of both these views, each encoding all the information to convert to the other. We define a process algebra of event Kripke structures, showing how to combine them in the usual waysparallel co...
Chu spaces: Complementarity and Uncertainty in Rational Mechanics
, 1994
"... this paper will be realizations. The category of Boolean operations and their propertypreserving renamings is not selfdual since nonT 0 Chu spaces transpose to nonextensional ones. By the same reasoning the full subcategory consisting of T 0 operations, those with no properties a j b for distinct ..."
Abstract

Cited by 9 (0 self)
 Add to MetaCart
this paper will be realizations. The category of Boolean operations and their propertypreserving renamings is not selfdual since nonT 0 Chu spaces transpose to nonextensional ones. By the same reasoning the full subcategory consisting of T 0 operations, those with no properties a j b for distinct variables a; b, is selfdual. This is a very important fact: it means that to every full subcategory C of this selfdual category we may associate its dual as the image of C under the selfduality. This associates sets to complete atomic Boolean algebras, Boolean algebras to Stone spaces, distributive lattices to StonePriestley posets, semilattices to algebraic lattices, complete semilattices to themselves, and so on for many other familiar [Joh82] and not so familiar (selfduality of finitedimensional vector spaces over GF (2)) instances of Stone duality We now illustrate the general idea with some examples.